Literature DB >> 21424831

2010 mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: healing complications are common after locked plating for distal femur fractures.

Christopher E Henderson1, Trevor J Lujan, Lori L Kuhl, Michael Bottlang, Daniel C Fitzpatrick, John L Marsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several mechanical studies suggest locking plate constructs may inhibit callus necessary for healing of distal femur fractures. However, the rate of nonunion and factors associated with nonunion are not well established. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) determined the healing rate of distal femur fractures treated with locking plates, (2) assessed the effect of patient injury and treatment variables on fracture healing, and (3) compared callus formation in fractures that healed with those that did not heal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 82 patients treated with 86 distal femur fractures using lateral locking plates. We reviewed all charts and radiographs to determine patient and treatment variables and then determined the effects of these variables on healing. We quantitatively measured callus at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. The minimum time for telephone interviews and SF-36v2(TM) scores was 1 year (mean, 4.2 years; range, 1-7.2 years).
RESULTS: Fourteen fractures (20%) failed to unite. Demographics and comorbidities were similar in patients who achieved healing compared with those who had nonunions. There were more empty holes in the plate adjacent to fractures that healed; comminuted fractures failed to heal more frequently than less comminuted fractures. Less callus formed in fractures with nonunions and in patients treated with stainless steel plates compared with titanium plates. Complications occurred in 28 of 70 fractures (40%), 19 of which had additional surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a high rate of nonunion in distal femur fractures treated with locking plates. Nonunion presented late without hardware failure and with limited callus formation suggesting callus inhibition rather than hardware failure is the primary problem. Mechanical factors may play a role in the high rate of nonunion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21424831      PMCID: PMC3094618          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1870-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur: a report of four cases.

Authors:  Gavin Button; Philip Wolinsky; David Hak
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 2.  Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization.

Authors:  P Schandelmaier; A Partenheimer; B Koenemann; O A Grün; C Krettek
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 3.  Fixation of distal femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.).

Authors:  P J Kregor; J L Hughes; P A Cole
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.

Authors:  S P Baker; B O'Neill; W Haddon; W B Long
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-03

5.  Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses.

Authors:  R B Gustilo; J T Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

Authors:  Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Eric Fulkerson; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures.

Authors:  Philip J Kregor; James A Stannard; Michael Zlowodzki; Peter A Cole
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Distal femoral fractures: long-term outcome following stabilisation with the LISS.

Authors:  A A Syed; M Agarwal; P V Giannoudis; S J E Matthews; R M Smith
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for fixation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications?

Authors:  Max Markmiller; Gerhard Konrad; Norbert Südkamp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (Less Invasive Stabilization System): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months.

Authors:  Florian Fankhauser; Gerald Gruber; Gert Schippinger; Christian Boldin; Herwig P Hofer; Wolfgang Grechenig; Rudolf Szyszkowitz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02
View more
  39 in total

1.  Modified fixations for distal femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical and clinical relevance study.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Chih-Wei Wang; Chia-Wei Lin; Chen-Yu Chen; Keng-Chang Liu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Implant material and design alter construct stiffness in distal femur locking plate fixation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ulf Schmidt; Rainer Penzkofer; Samuel Bachmaier; Peter Augat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Outcomes of distal femur fractures treated with the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate.

Authors:  Khang H Dang; Connor A Armstrong; Ravi A Karia; Boris A Zelle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  CORR Insights(®): Addition of a Medial Locking Plate to an In Situ Lateral Locking Plate Results in Healing of Distal Femoral Nonunions.

Authors:  Paul J Dougherty
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Retrograde dynamic locked intramedullary nailing for aseptic supracondylar femoral nonunion after dynamic condylar screw treatment.

Authors:  Chi-Chuan Wu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-17

6.  From Bench to Bedside: How Stiff is Too Stiff? Far-cortical Locking or Dynamic Locked Plating May Obviate the Question.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Dynamic locking screw improves fixation strength in osteoporotic bone: an in vitro study on an artificial bone model.

Authors:  Tim Pohlemann; Boyko Gueorguiev; Yash Agarwal; Dieter Wahl; Christoph Sprecher; Karsten Schwieger; Mark Lenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Lateral locked plating for distal femur fractures by low-energy trauma: what makes a difference in healing?

Authors:  Sang-Min Kim; Jae-Woo Yeom; Hyung Keun Song; Kyu-Tae Hwang; Ji-Hyo Hwang; Je-Hyun Yoo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Treatment of Distal Femur Nonunion Following Initial Fixation with a Lateral Locking Plate.

Authors:  Nabil A Ebraheim; Grant S Buchanan; Xiaochen Liu; Maxwell E Cooper; Nicholas Peters; Jacob A Hessey; Jiayong Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  Dynamic Fixation of Humeral Shaft Fractures Using Active Locking Plates: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Steven M Madey; Stanley Tsai; Daniel C Fitzpatrick; Kathleen Earley; Michael Lutsch; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.