Literature DB >> 26849390

Early Mechanical Failures of the Synthes Variable Angle Locking Distal Femur Plate.

Jason C Tank1, Prism S Schneider, Elizabeth Davis, Matthew Galpin, Mark L Prasarn, Andrew M Choo, John W Munz, Timothy S Achor, James F Kellam, Joshua L Gary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To document the high failure rate of a specific implant: the Synthes Variable Angle (VA) Locking Distal Femur Plate.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Urban University Level I Trauma Center. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: All distal femur fractures (OTA/AO 33-A, B, C) treated from March 2011 through August 2013 were reviewed from our institutional orthopaedic trauma registry. Inclusion criteria were fractures treated with a precontoured distal femoral locking plate and age between 18 and 84. Exclusion criteria were fractures treated with intramedullary nails, arthroplasty, non-precontoured plates, dual plating, or screw fixation alone. The population was divided into 3 groups: less invasive stabilization system (LISS) group (n = 21), treated with LISS plates (Synthes, Paoli, PA); locking condylar plates (LCPs) group (n = 10), treated with LCPs (Synthes, Paoli, PA); and VA group (n = 36), treated with VA distal femoral LCPs (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Average age was 54.6 ± 17.5 years. INTERVENTION: Open reduction internal fixation with one of the above implants was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients were followed radiographically for early mechanical implant failure defined as loosening of locking screws, loss of fixation, plate bending, or implant failure.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups for age, gender, open fracture, mechanism of injury, or medial comminution. There were 3 failures (14.3%) in group LISS, no failures (0%) in group LCP, and 8 failures (22.2%) in group VA. All 3 failures in group LISS were in A-type fractures (2 periprosthetic) and all failures in group VA were in C-type fractures. When all fractures for all 3 groups were compared for failure rate, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.23). However, when only 33-C fractures were compared, there was significantly greater failure rate in the VA group (P = 0.03). The mean time to failure in group VA was 147 days (range 24-401 days) and was significantly earlier (P = 0.034) when compared with group LISS (mean 356 days; range 251-433 days).
CONCLUSIONS: Early mechanical failure with the VA distal femoral locking plate is higher than traditional locking plates (LCP and LISS) for OTA/AO 33-C fractures. We caution practicing surgeons against the use of this plate for metaphyseal fragmented distal femur fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26849390     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of distal femur fractures treated with the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate.

Authors:  Khang H Dang; Connor A Armstrong; Ravi A Karia; Boris A Zelle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Riikka E Koso; Cristina Terhoeve; R Grant Steen; Robert Zura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The Use of Fibular Allograft in Complex Periarticular Fractures Around the Knee.

Authors:  Ashley E Levack; Naomi Gadinsky; Elizabeth B Gausden; Craig Klinger; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Oper Tech Orthop       Date:  2018-07-29

4.  Retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures results in high union rate.

Authors:  Samantha Nino; Joshua A Parry; Frank R Avilucea; George J Haidukewych; Joshua R Langford
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-08

5.  Comparing Intramedullary Nailing Versus Locked Plating in the Treatment of Native Distal Femur Fractures: Is One Superior to the Other?

Authors:  Jaclyn M Jankowski; Patrick F Szukics; Jay K Shah; David M Keller; Robinson E Pires; Frank A Liporace; Richard S Yoon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 6.  Biomechanical and anatomical considerations for dual plating of distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Graham J DeKeyser; Anne J Hakim; Dillon C O'Neill; Carsten W Schlickewei; Lucas S Marchand; Justin M Haller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.928

7.  Surgical Treatment of Distal Femur Fractures in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Antonia Loosen; Yannick Fritz; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-02

8.  Impact on periosteal vasculature after dual plating of the distal femur: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Michael J Chen; Lawrence Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2021-04-12

9.  Immediate Full Weight-Bearing Versus Partial Weight-Bearing After Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Martin Paulsson; Carl Ekholm; Eythor Jonsson; Mats Geijer; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-06

10.  Virtual Simulation for Interactive Visualization of 3D Fracture Fixation Biomechanics.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Hwabok Wee; Jared Vicory; April D Armstrong; J Spence Reid
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.020

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.