Literature DB >> 26302945

Interaural stimulation timing in single sided deaf cochlear implant users.

S Zirn1, S Arndt2, A Aschendorff3, T Wesarg4.   

Abstract

The interaural time difference (ITD) is an important cue for the localization of sounds. ITD changes as little as 10 μs can be detected by the human auditory system. By provision of one ear with a cochlear implant (CI) ITD are altered due to the partial replacement of the peripheral auditory system. A hearing aid (HA), in contrast, does not replace but adds a processing delay component to the peripheral auditory system extending ITD. The aim of the present study was to quantify interaural stimulation timing between these different modalities to estimate the need for central auditory temporal compensation in single sided deaf CI users or bimodal CI/HA users. For this purpose, wave V latencies of auditory brainstem responses evoked either acoustically (ABR) or electrically via the CI (EABR) have been measured. The sum of delays consisting of CI signal processing measured in the MED-EL OPUS2 audio processor and EABR wave V latencies evoked on different intracochlear sites allowed an estimation of the entire CI channel-specific delay for MED-EL MAESTRO CI systems. We compared these values with ABR wave V latencies measured in the contralateral normal hearing or HA provided ear in different frequency bands. The results showed that EABR wave V latencies were consistently shorter than those evoked acoustically in the unaided normal hearing ear. Thus, artificial delays within the audio processor can be implemented to adjust interaural stimulation timing. The currently implemented group delays in the MED-EL CI system turned out to be reasonably similar to those of the unaided ear. For adjustment of CI and contralateral HA, in contrast, an adjustable additional across-frequency delay in the range of 1-11 ms implemented in the CI would be required. Especially for bimodal CI/HA users the adjustment of interaural stimulation timing may induce improved binaural hearing, reduced need for central auditory temporal compensation and increased acceptance of the CI/HA provision.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bimodal hearing; Cochlear implant; Hearing aid; Interaural stimulation timing; MED-EL cochlear implant systems; Processing delay; Single sided deafness

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26302945     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

3.  Sensitivity to binaural temporal-envelope beats with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant as a measure of tonotopic match (L).

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Matthew B Winn; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Counting or discriminating the number of voices to assess binaural fusion with single-sided vocoders.

Authors:  Jessica M Wess; Nathaniel J Spencer; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

6.  Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mahan Azadpour; Jonathan Neukam; Nicole Hope Capach; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Olga Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ayham Zedan; Tim Jürgens; Ben Williges; Birger Kollmeier; Konstantin Wiebe; Julio Galindo; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  No Benefit of Deriving Cochlear-Implant Maps From Binaural Temporal-Envelope Sensitivity for Speech Perception or Spatial Hearing Under Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Coral E Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.