Literature DB >> 30242053

The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.

Anna Grubert1, Martin Eimer2.   

Abstract

Search for target objects in visual scenes is guided by mental representations of target features (attentional templates). However, it is unknown when such templates are activated during each search episode and whether this can be controlled by temporal expectations. We used electrophysiological measures to track search template activation processes in real time. In three experiments, female and male humans searched for a color-defined target object in search displays where targets were accompanied by distractors in different nontarget colors. Brief task-irrelevant color singleton probes that matched the target template were flashed rapidly (every 200 ms) throughout each block. Probes presented at times when the target template is active should capture attention, whereas probes presented at other times should not. To assess this, N2pc components were measured as markers of attentional capture, separately for probes at each successive temporal position between two search displays. Results demonstrated that search templates were active from ∼1000 ms before the arrival of the next search display, and were deactivated after each search episode, even when the preceding search display did not contain a target object. Templates were activated later when the predictable interval between search displays was increased. Results demonstrate that search templates are not continuously active but are transiently activated during the preparation for each new search episode. These activation states are regulated in a top-down fashion by temporal expectations about when an attentional template will become task-relevant.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is often assumed that observers prepare for a visual search task by activating mental representations of search target objects (attentional templates). However, the time course of such template activation processes is completely unknown. By using a new sequential probe presentation technique and electrophysiological measures of attentional processing, we demonstrate that target templates are rapidly activated and deactivated before and after each successive search display, and that these template activation states are tuned to observers' temporal expectations. These results provide novel insights into the temporal dynamics of cognitive control processes in visual attention. They show that attentional templates for visual search are preparatory states that are activated in a transient fashion before each new search episode.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/389527-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; cognitive control; event-related brain potentials; visual search; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30242053      PMCID: PMC6705999          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0409-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  24 in total

1.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Just say no: how are visual searches terminated when there is no target present?

Authors:  M M Chun; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-09

Review 5.  The neural basis of attentional control in visual search.

Authors:  Martin Eimer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.

Authors:  Anna Grubert; Johannes Fahrenfort; Christian N L Olivers; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-10

9.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Monika Kiss; Clare Press; Disa Sauter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Template-to-distractor distinctiveness regulates visual search efficiency.

Authors:  Joy J Geng; Phillip Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  The diachronic account of attentional selectivity.

Authors:  Alon Zivony; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-12-16

4.  Progress and Remaining Issues: A Response to the Commentaries on.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2021-09-24

5.  Revisit once more the sensory storage account of visual working memory.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-09-20

Review 6.  Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02-05

7.  Visual search guidance uses coarser template information than target-match decisions.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Simran K Johal; Joy J Geng
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  The time-course of component processes of selective attention.

Authors:  Tanya Wen; John Duncan; Daniel J Mitchell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The state of memory-matched distractor in working memory influence the visual attention.

Authors:  Quanshan Long; Ting Luo; Sheng Zhang; Yuanling Jiang; Na Hu; Yan Gu; Peng Xu; Antao Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Allocation of resources in working memory: Theoretical and empirical implications for visual search.

Authors:  Stanislas Huynh Cong; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.