Literature DB >> 8862112

The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity.

M Eimer1.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during visual discrimination tasks in which stimulus arrays were presented that contained one lateral target and 3 (experiment 1) or one (experiments 2 and 3) non-targets. In experiments 1 and 2, targets differed from non-targets with respect to their form or their color. In experiment 3, word pairs were presented, with targets differing from non-targets with respect to their content. Subjects were required to respond to the identity of the target. In all experiments, an enhanced negativity was elicited at posterior electrodes contralateral to the location of the target. In the form discrimination tasks, this effect was present in the N1, N2, and P3 time intervals. In the color discrimination tasks, it was confined to the N2 time range. In the word discrimination task (experiment 3), this effect could only be observed over the left posterior hemisphere. It is argued that these lateralized negativities reflect the N2pc component that is assumed to indicate attentional filtering processes during visual search tasks. The present results extend this assumption by showing that this component is also elicited when targets are presented together with just one non-target item. It is argued that the N2pc may reflect the attentional selection of task-relevant stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8862112     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  196 in total

1.  Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: an EEG-based approach.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; M Wolber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-15

2.  Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: a lateralized event-related potential study.

Authors:  Birgit Stürmer; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal the availability of reward.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Tom Nissens; Daniel Pearson; Mike Le Pelley; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Is detecting prospective cues the same as selecting targets? An ERP study.

Authors:  Robert West; Nicholas Wymbs
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task.

Authors:  Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Piotr Jaśkowski; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-01

8.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

9.  Mind-wandering Is Accompanied by Both Local Sleep and Enhanced Processes of Spatial Attention Allocation.

Authors:  Christian Wienke; Mandy V Bartsch; Lena Vogelgesang; Christoph Reichert; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Stefan Dürschmid
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-01-15

10.  Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Scott A Guerin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.