Literature DB >> 30224954

Atomic level three-dimensional structure of individual particles with XFELs.

Changyong Song1.   

Abstract

Progress in single-particle three-dimensional imaging is discussed, with advances in both data-collection and data-handling techniques described.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray free electron lasers; atomic scale structure; image analysis; imaging virus particles; single-particle three-dimensional imaging; three-dimensional reconstruction

Year:  2018        PMID: 30224954      PMCID: PMC6126649          DOI: 10.1107/S2052252518011909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IUCrJ        ISSN: 2052-2525            Impact factor:   4.769


Interest in acquiring three-dimensional atomic structures using single specimens has been extremely keen. The possibility of bypassing the painstaking effort to make crystals is a huge attraction and has invigorated single-particle three-dimensional imaging research, with remarkable accomplishments in unveiling the structures of many challenging proteins and macromolecular complexes using cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) (Renaud et al., 2018 ▸). The cryoEM technique has been an unrivalled method of choice for atomic level single-particle three-dimensional imaging. The X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) is changing this landscape, as XFEL single-pulse imaging joins the race (Ekeberg et al., 2015 ▸; Martin & Loh, 2013 ▸). Applications of femtosecond X-ray laser pulses from XFELs for single-particle imaging introduce a complementary capability to image specimens under ambient conditions, preserving native sample conditions and with a natural extension to follow dynamics (Spence, 2017 ▸). XFEL single-particle imaging is realized by collecting a large number of coherent diffraction patterns from single specimens of high homogeneity using single XFEL pulses. As each diffraction pattern represents the projected electron density of the specimen at a random orientation, the three-dimensional orientation among the measured diffraction patterns needs to be figured out, which is usually taken care of by specially devised numerical algorithms (Gaffney & Chapman, 2007 ▸). In this issue of , Filipe Maia and colleagues (Lundholm et al., 2018 ▸) report the three-dimensional reconstruction of Melbourne virus (MelV) via XFEL single-particle diffraction imaging, while systematically investigating the data-handling process and its propagation to a reconstructed three-dimensional image. Coherent diffraction patterns were collected at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS, Stanford, California, USA) from single MelV particles with the nominal size of 230 nm in diameter using 0.1 GW X-ray pulses on the samples, delivering ∼1011 photons of 1.2 keV photon energy. Virus particles were delivered to the X-ray interaction spot through an aerosol injector. The chance of hitting a single virus particle with a pulsed X-ray beam is stochastic, governed by Poisson statistics (Park et al., 2013 ▸). Out of 965 739 patterns containing scattered X-ray photons, only 260 patterns were selected as displaying valid diffraction signals of single virus particles with good sample homogeneity. These 260 two-dimensional patterns at random orientations were assembled into a three-dimensional diffraction pattern using the EMC algorithm. This algorithm performs the three-dimensional assembly by maximizing the likelihood between conjectured and measured diffraction patterns while searching over an expanded parameter space (Loh & Elser, 2009 ▸; Fung et al., 2008 ▸). Finally, a three-dimensional image of the virus particle was obtained at 28 nm resolution by retrieving the phase of the oversampled three-dimensional coherent diffraction patterns through iterative operations of discrete Fourier transformation between real and diffraction space (Miao et al., 1999 ▸). The process appears straightforward, but the caveat is in accepting all the details of the obtained three-dimensional image as real features, even though they can result from experimental noise. The authors have demonstrated the crucial importance of eliminating background noise, which produces an artificial high-density structure at the image center. Further, the influence of sample inhomogeneity, intensity fluctuation, algorithm-specific parameters etc. on the three-dimensional image were studied to provide practical guidelines for three-dimensional single-particle imaging via XFELs. The research field of XFEL single-particle three-dimensional imaging is immature but expanding fast. Available data are yet scant and more experimental data need to be collected, which will help to refine experimental techniques and data-handling protocols. Proof-of-principle results showing three-dimensional images have been reported (Ekeberg et al., 2015 ▸; Kurta et al., 2017 ▸). However, experimental data from controlled systems are still needed to evaluate the fidelity of the reconstructed images under given experimental conditions. The interest in XFEL dynamic single-particle imaging is significant, stimulating research to introduce advanced schemes for sample delivery and data processing. Given the increasing availability of XFEL sources (Kang et al., 2017 ▸) and higher repetition rate operations on the megahertz scale, we expect to observe many new research activities in single-particle three-dimensional imaging with increased image resolution to address challenging scientific issues of interest.
  7 in total

1.  Imaging atomic structure and dynamics with ultrafast x-ray scattering.

Authors:  K J Gaffney; H N Chapman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cryo-EM structure of a Marseilleviridae virus particle reveals a large internal microassembly.

Authors:  Kenta Okamoto; Naoyuki Miyazaki; Hemanth K N Reddy; Max F Hantke; Filipe R N C Maia; Daniel S D Larsson; Chantal Abergel; Jean-Michel Claverie; Janos Hajdu; Kazuyoshi Murata; Martin Svenda
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Reconstruction algorithm for single-particle diffraction imaging experiments.

Authors:  Ne-Te Duane Loh; Veit Elser
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2009-08-24

4.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of the giant mimivirus particle with an x-ray free-electron laser.

Authors:  Tomas Ekeberg; Martin Svenda; Chantal Abergel; Filipe R N C Maia; Virginie Seltzer; Jean-Michel Claverie; Max Hantke; Olof Jönsson; Carl Nettelblad; Gijs van der Schot; Mengning Liang; Daniel P DePonte; Anton Barty; M Marvin Seibert; Bianca Iwan; Inger Andersson; N Duane Loh; Andrew V Martin; Henry Chapman; Christoph Bostedt; John D Bozek; Ken R Ferguson; Jacek Krzywinski; Sascha W Epp; Daniel Rolles; Artem Rudenko; Robert Hartmann; Nils Kimmel; Janos Hajdu
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 5.  Cryo-EM in drug discovery: achievements, limitations and prospects.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Renaud; Ashwin Chari; Claudio Ciferri; Wen-Ti Liu; Hervé-William Rémigy; Holger Stark; Christian Wiesmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  XFELs for structure and dynamics in biology.

Authors:  J C H Spence
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.769

7.  Correlations in Scattered X-Ray Laser Pulses Reveal Nanoscale Structural Features of Viruses.

Authors:  Ruslan P Kurta; Jeffrey J Donatelli; Chun Hong Yoon; Peter Berntsen; Johan Bielecki; Benedikt J Daurer; Hasan DeMirci; Petra Fromme; Max Felix Hantke; Filipe R N C Maia; Anna Munke; Carl Nettelblad; Kanupriya Pande; Hemanth K N Reddy; Jonas A Sellberg; Raymond G Sierra; Martin Svenda; Gijs van der Schot; Ivan A Vartanyants; Garth J Williams; P Lourdu Xavier; Andrew Aquila; Peter H Zwart; Adrian P Mancuso
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 9.161

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.