| Literature DB >> 30205493 |
Wee Suan Low1, Thomas Cornfield2, Catriona A Charlton3, Jeremy W Tomlinson4,5, Leanne Hodson6,7.
Abstract
Dietary free sugars have received much attention over the past few years. Much of the focus has been on the effect of fructose on hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL). Therefore the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of meals high and low in fructose on postprandial hepatic DNL and fatty acid partitioning and dietary fatty acid oxidation. Sixteen healthy adults (eight men, eight women) participated in this randomised cross-over study; study days were separated by a 4-week wash-out period. Hepatic DNL and dietary fatty acid oxidation were assessed using stable-isotope tracer methodology. Consumption of the high fructose meal significantly increased postprandial hepatic DNL to a greater extent than consumption of the low fructose meal and this effect was evident in women but not men. Despite an increase in hepatic DNL, there was no change in dietary fatty acid oxidation. Taken together, our data show that women are more responsive to ingestion of higher amounts of fructose than men and if continued over time this may lead to changes in hepatic fatty acid partitioning and eventually liver fat content.Entities:
Keywords: VLDL-TG; diet; fructose; human; lipogenesis; liver; sex
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30205493 PMCID: PMC6164310 DOI: 10.3390/nu10091263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Participant characteristics.
| Age (y) | Men ( | Women ( |
|---|---|---|
| 42.8 ± 1.8 | 46.6 ± 0.9 | |
| Weight (kg) | 93.0 ± 3.3 | 81.0 ± 3.3 * |
| Height (cm) | 178 ± 2 | 169 ± 2 ** |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.2 ± 0.9 | 28.5 ± 1.2 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 101 ± 4 | 94 ± 4 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 106 ± 1 | 110 ± 2 |
| Waist to hip ratio | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.03 * |
| Total fat mass (kg) | 27.7 ± 2.6 | 33.7 ± 3.1 |
| Total lean mass (kg) | 61.6 ± 1.3 | 44.7 ± 1.7 *** |
| Android fat (kg) | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.5 |
| Gynoid fat (kg) | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.4 ** |
| Android/Gynoid fat ratio | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 * |
| Visceral fat (kg) | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.3 |
| Liver fat (%) | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 1.6 |
Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Abbreviations: Body Mass Index, BMI. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 men vs. women.
Participant characteristics and biochemical variables on the low-fructose and high-fructose meal study days.
| Low Fructose Meal | High Fructose Meal | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All ( | Men ( | Women ( | All ( | Men ( | Women ( | |
| Weight (kg) | 87.7 ± 2.8 | 93.5 ± 3.2 | 81.2 ± 3.3 † | 87.3 ± 2.7 | 93.6 ± 3.3 | 81.9 ± 3.5 † |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.0 ± 0.7 | 29.4 ± 0.8 | 28.6 ± 1.1 | 29.2 ± 0.7 | 29.4 ± 0.9 | 29.0 ± 1.1 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 1.8 ± 0.3 * | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
|
| ||||||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.3 | 5.0± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.1 ± 0.3 |
| Fructose (mmol/L) | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| Insulin (mU/L) | 10.1 ± 0.9 | 12.0 ± 1.0 | 8.2 ± 1.1 † | 9.9 ± 1.0 | 11.6 ± 1.5 | 8.5 ± 1.0 |
| Total Chol (mmol/L) | 4.7 ± 0.2 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ± 0.4 |
| HDL-Chol (mmol/L) | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.1 * | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 |
| Non-HDL-Chol (mmol/L) | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.2 |
| NEFA (µmol/L) | 459 ± 57 | 383 ± 56 | 536 ± 95 | 445 ± 38 | 416 ± 32 | 474 ± 69 |
| TAG (mmol/L) | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| 3-OHB (µmol/L) | 114 ± 33 | 115 ± 64 | 112 ± 24 | 86 ± 20 | 98 ± 33 | 74 ± 23 |
|
| ||||||
| Chylomicron-TAG (µmol/L) | 229 ± 33 | 321 ± 41 | 138 ± 24 †† | 256 ± 61 | 347 ± 110 | 164 ± 37 |
| TRL-TAG (µmol/L) | 711 ± 102 | 860 ± 178 | 563 ± 82 | 784 ± 117 | 890 ± 202 | 677 ± 120 |
| VLDL-TAG (µmol/L) | 345 ± 43 | 383 ± 77 | 308 ± 40 | 343 ± 43 | 347 ± 68 | 338 ± 57 |
Data presented as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations: BMI, Body Mass Index; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; Chol, Cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoproteins; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids, TAG, triacylglycerol; TRL, triacylglycerol-rich lipoproteins; VLDL, very low density lipoproteins; 3-OHB, 3-hydroxybutyrate. * P < 0.05, low vs. high fructose; P < 0.05, P < 0.01 men vs. women.
Figure 1The postprandial response after the consumption of the low fructose (LF) and high fructose (HF) meals of (a) plasma glucose (P < 0.001 time, P < 0.01 meal); (b) plasma (P < 0.001 time, P < 0.05 meal); (c) plasma insulin (P < 0.001 time, P < 0.01 meal), (d) plasma triacylglycerol (TAG) (P < 0.001 time); (e) plasma non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) (P < 0.001 time); and (f) plasma 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-OHB) (P < 0.001 time). Data presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
The time-averaged postprandial incorporation of 13C (from dietary fat) into plasma and breath and the contribution of dietary fat to VLDL-TAG after consumption of a low- and high-fructose meal.
| Low Fructose Meal | High Fructose Meal | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All ( | Men ( | Women ( | All ( | Men ( | Women ( | |
| (13C) palmitate in chylomicron-TAG (µmol/L) | 0.87 ± 0.12 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.2 † | 0.88 ± 0.22 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| (13C) palmitate in plasma NEFA (µmol/L) | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 0.43 ± 0.09 | 0.41 ± 0.08 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.30 ± 0.07 ‡ |
| (13C) palmitate in VLDL-TAG (µmol/L) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
| (13C) palmitate in plasma TAG (µmol/L) | 1.62 ± 0.21 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.30 ± 0.21 | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
| 13CO2 (µmol/min) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.1 † |
| 13CO2 (µmol/min/kg lean mass) | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.003 | 0.03 ± 0.004 | 0.03 ± 0.003 |
| Relative (%) contribution of dietary fat to VLDL-TAG | 23 ± 2 | 26 ± 3 | 20 ± 3 | 19 ± 2 * | 21 ± 3 ‡ | 17 ± 2 |
Data presented as mean ± SEM. Abbreviations: NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids, TAG, triacylglycerol; VLDL, very low density lipoproteins; 3-OHB, 3-hydroxybutyrate. * P < 0.05 low vs high fructose; P < 0.05 men vs women; P < 0.05 within sex low vs high fructose.
Figure 2The contribution (%) of DNL fatty acids to VLDL-TAG in (a) the whole group after the consumption of the low fructose (LF) and high fructose (HF) meals (P < 0.001 time, P = 0.05 meal, time × meal P = 0.06); (b) women and men after consumption of the low fructose (LF) meal (P < 0.001 time); and (c) women and men after consumption of the high fructose (HF) meal (P < 0.001 time, P < 0.05 sex, P < 0.01 time × sex interaction). Data presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3The association between the postprandial contribution (%) of DNL fatty acids in VLDL-TAG and the postprandial plasma concentrations of 3-hydroxybutyrate (3-OHB) after (a) the low fructose meal, and (b) the high fructose meal.