Literature DB >> 29040543

Cohort Profile: The Oxford Biobank.

Fredrik Karpe1,2, Senthil K Vasan1, Sandy M Humphreys1,2, John Miller1,2, Jane Cheeseman1,2, A Louise Dennis1,2, Matt J Neville1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29040543      PMCID: PMC5837504          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


× No keyword cloud information.

OBB in a nutshell

The Oxford Biobank is a population-based repository of biological material and health-related information on ∼8000 healthy participants, men and women aged 30–50 years, from Oxfordshire, UK. The bioresource includes a broad range of cardiovascular- and obesity-related phenotypes including biochemical and genetic biomarkers, anthropometric measurements and body composition assessed using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The cohort has the specific feature to allow for future dedicated recall studies based on baseline phenotype and genotype. With that capacity, the Oxford biobank is a resource for mechanistic research of genetic and phenotypic traits in a broad range of chronic disease such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and obesity complications. Researchers interested in using the cohort should go through the online portal [www.oxfordbiobank.org.uk].

Why was the cohort set up?

Major progress has been made over the past decade in the understanding of the genetic background to chronic metabolic disease such as type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). These disorders show a significant degree of heritability and disease pathogenesis that rely on the combination of a multitude of unfavourable genotypes on which over-nutrition, lack of physical exercise, obesity and smoking augment the phenotype. Currently, the number of common genetic variants robustly associated with CVD and T2D are increasing with the increasing size of discovery cohorts; for CVD, the number now exceeds 50 variants and for T2D and glycaemic traits, the corresponding number is about 75., Combining several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets which include information on highly relevant intermediate phenotypes has potentially helped in discovery and replication of several disease loci and identification of novel pathways and pleiotropic genes. However, little is known about the functional consequences of most of the identified gene variants. The use of well-characterized bioresources, in which investigations into intermediate phenotypes can be performed, will be invaluable in order to provide mechanistic insight into these poorly characterized genes and thus promote translational research. To this end the Oxford Biobank (OBB) was set up with the primary goal of establishing a local cohort accessible for genomic translational research. The resource is built to enable studies on physiological consequences of genetic mechanisms of disease. A leading principle has been to seek informed consent from participants to be re-approached for future discrete projects. Therefore, based on the information gathered during a baseline visit, ‘recruit-by-genotype’ (RbG) and ‘recruit-by-phenotype’ (RbP) projects allow for detailed investigations of associations between genotypes and biomarkers, or monitoring of more detailed physiological processes. The OBB serves as a resource for researchers to investigate mechanisms leading to increased T2D and CVD susceptibility and to explore novel therapeutic targets in the prevention and treatment of chronic non-communicable diseases.

Who is in the cohort?

The OBB is a random, population-based recruitment of healthy participants between the ages of 30 and 50 years from the Oxfordshire general population (approximately 800 000 inhabitants). Individuals with: previous diagnosis of myocardial infarction or heart failure currently on treatment; untreated malignancies; or other systemic ongoing disease, and pregnant women were excluded from participation. The OBB recruitment began in 1999 and includes 7640 (4316 women and 3324 men) individuals as of October 2016, with the aim of having a local cohort of 10 000 people among whom recalling can be achieved. This sample size is based on the ability to identify an average of 25 people who are homozygous for what is normally considered common genetic variants (minor allele frequency greater than 0.05). For the purpose of reaching out to even larger populations to allow for recruitment of carriers of rare gene variants or phenotypes, the Oxford Biobank is a partner of the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Bioresource currently reaching ∼100 000 people. Baseline demographics of the OBB participants are provided in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the OBB participants

CharacteristicsnMale (n = 3324)nFemale (n = 4316)
Sociodemographics
Age332443 (37, 46)431642 (37, 46)
Smokinga
 Never+Ex-smoker33152901 (87.5)43083929 (91.2)
 Current smoker414 (12.5)379 (8.8)
Alcohol intakea
 No alcohol331526 (0.8)4308138 (3.2)
 Moderate2865 (86.4)3803 (88.3)
 Heavy424 (12.8)367 (8.5)
Physical activitya
 Sedentary3315149 (4.5)4308178 (4.1)
 Moderate1983 (59.8)3154 (73.2)
 Vigorous1183 (35.7)976 (22.7)
Menopausea3412266 (7.8)
Anthropometry
 Height (cm)3322179 (174, 183)4315165 (161, 170)
 Weight (kg)332283.5 (75.5, 93.0)431566.5 (59.8, 75.7)
 Body mass index (kg/m2)332226.1 (23.8, 28.7)431524.1 (21.9, 27.6)
 Waist circumference (cm)331792 (85, 99)430780 (73, 88)
 Hip circumference (cm)3292101 (97, 106)4306100 (95, 106)
 Supra-iliac skinfold thickness (mm)332017 (12, 25)430817 (11, 26)
 Subscapular skinfold thickness (mm)328317 (13, 22)427118 (12, 24)
 Triceps skinfold thickness (mm)331212 (9, 18)430922 (17, 28)
 Biceps skinfold thickness (mm)33247 (5, 10)431612 (8, 18)
 Thigh skinfold thickness (mm)138814 (10, 20)226335 (24, 53)
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)3324126 (119, 134)4316114 (107, 123)
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)332479 (73, 85)431673 (67, 79)
Biochemical tests
 Fasting glucose (mmol/l)33175.3 (5.1, 5.7)43075.0 (4.8, 5.3)
 Fasting insulin (mU/l)329312.5 (9.6, 16.3)427111.0 (8.5, 14.3)
 Total cholesterol (mmol/l)33175.3 (4.6, 6.0)43055.0 (4.4, 5.7)
 Triglycerides (mmol/l)33171.2 (0.8, 1.7)43050.8 (0.6, 1.1)
 HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)33171.2 (1.0, 1.4)43051.5 (1.2, 1.8)
 LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l)32863.4 (2.9, 4.1)43013.1 (2.6, 3.6)
 Apolipoprotein B (g/l)33171.0 (0.8, 1.1)43050.8 (0.7, 1.0)
 Apolipoprotein A1 (g/l)21031.3 (1.2, 1.5)25091.5 (1.3, 1.7)
 NEFA (µmol/l)3315404 (286, 54)4303489 (346, 658)
 hs-CRP (mg/l)33050.6 (0.2, 1.7)42900.5 (0.1, 1.8)
 3-hydroxy butyrate (umol/l)331451.2 (34.9, 85.7)430764.1 (38.9, 116.2)
 Lactate (mmol/l)32900.85 (0.66, 1.13)42840.67 (0.54, 0.94)
 Glycerol (µmol/l)331037.9 (27.5, 52.6)429456.5 (40.3, 77.9)
 IGF-1 (µg/l)1148208 (177, 246)1154205 (167, 247)
 IGFBP-1 (µg/l)114730 (19, 45)115444 (28, 63)
DXA measurements
Fat mass (kg)
 Arms21462.2 (1.7, 2.8)28712.6 (2.0, 3.3)
 Legs21466.0 (4.8, 7.5)28718.5 (6.8, 10.7)
 Trunk214612.7 (9.1, 16.8)287110.7 (7.6, 14.9)
 Android21462.1 (1.4, 2.9)28711.6 (1.0, 2.4)
 Gynoid21463.3 (2.6, 4.1)28714.3 (3.4, 5.4)
 Total fat214622.0 (16.9, 28.1)287122.6 (17.6, 29.6)
 Visceral fat21460.9 (0.5, 1.6)28710.3 (0.1, 0.6)
Lean mass(kg)
 Arms21467.3 (6.6, 8.2)28714.2 (3.8, 4.7)
 Legs214619.9 (18.2, 21.8)287113.9 (12.6, 15.3)
 Trunk214626.9 (24.9, 29.0)287120 (18.4, 21.6)
 Android21464.0 (3.6, 4.3)28712.9 (2.6, 3.2)
 Gynoid21469.1 (8.4, 10.1)28716.4 (5.9, 7.0)
BMD (g/cm2)*
 Total21461.1 (1.0, 1.2)28711.2 (1.0, 1.3)
 Spine21461.2 (1.1, 1.3)28681.1 (1.0, 1.2)

IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1; hs-CRP, highly sensitive C-reactive protein; BMD, bone mineral density.

All data presented as median (interquartile range) and afrequency (percentage).

aSmoking: classified as ex-smokers and current smokers.

aAlcohol intake: moderate consumption, less than 21 units in men and less than 14 units in women (per week); heavy consumption, greater than 21 units in men and greater than 14 units in women (per week).

aPhysical activity classified as moderate and vigorous activity per week.

Baseline characteristics of the OBB participants IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1; hs-CRP, highly sensitive C-reactive protein; BMD, bone mineral density. All data presented as median (interquartile range) and afrequency (percentage). aSmoking: classified as ex-smokers and current smokers. aAlcohol intake: moderate consumption, less than 21 units in men and less than 14 units in women (per week); heavy consumption, greater than 21 units in men and greater than 14 units in women (per week). aPhysical activity classified as moderate and vigorous activity per week.

Recruitment

The OBB includes a randomized, age-stratified sample obtained from Oxfordshire and the Thames Valley. The Thames Valley Primary Care Agency has enabled random recruitment by providing lists of Oxfordshire residents registered with a local general practitioner and aged 30–50 years. An invitation letter along with the study information and response sheet were sent to all the participants. Subjects who expressed willingness to enrol in the OBB were contacted by telephone or e-mail, in order to convey a brief overview of the study aims and objectives, by trained research nurses. Possible exclusions for active disease or previous history of T2D or CVD were confirmed during this contact, and only eligible participants were scheduled for a clinic visit. Eligible participants were then scheduled to visit the Clinical Research Unit at the Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism for a baseline investigation. Exclusion criteria were type 1 and type 2 diabetes, established CVD, cancer, known autoimmune or severe inflammatory conditions, substance abuse or psychiatric condition making participation in Stage 2 (see later) unlikely. The OBB protocol is approved by the Oxfordshire Clinical Research Ethics Committee (08/H0606/107+5) and all participants have provided informed consent.

How often have they been followed up?

All participants have a detailed baseline characterization (Stage 1). Subsequently, selected volunteers are invited for a second visit (recall) to comply with a specific research protocol (Stage 2). Information on who is selected for such recall studies will be determined by the research question and the available information from the Stage 1 visit. Such recalls could be either ‘recall-by-genotype’ or ‘recall-by-phenotype’.

What has been measured?

The OBB has collected a broad range of metabolic-, CVD- and obesity-related phenotypes based on blood plasma phenotyping, genetic biomarkers, questionnaires, anthropometric measurements and body composition assessment using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). A brief description of variables collected at baseline is provided below.

Anthropometry

This included height, weight, waist and hip circumference (WC and HC) measurements, and calliper-measured skinfold thickness of the upper arm (over biceps and triceps), subscapular, abdominal and thigh regions.

Questionnaire-based assessments

Information on potential risk exposures or confounders in disease pathology, such as physical activity, smoking and alcohol intake, were obtained using validated questionnaires. The OBB participants were also interviewed by trained nurses on family history of any chronic disease (such as the ‘Rose’ questionnaire for angina pectoris) given that the family history is a well-known predictor of CVD and T2D. The questionnaires were all adopted from previously used studies and have not been internally validated.

Blood pressure

An automatic pulse-detecting sphygmomanometer (Omron M3) was used to record systolic and diastolic blood pressure, using a standard protocol involving four sequential measurements after 10 min in the semi-recumbent position. The average of the last three measurements was used.

Biochemistry

Venous antecubital blood was drawn after an overnight fast and immediately put on ice. Plasma was separated within 60 min, frozen at −20°C within 120 min and transferred to −80°C within 4 h. Plasma samples have been analysed for glucose, lipids/lipoproteins (cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein-B (ApoB), apolipoprotein A1, C-reactive protein (CRP), insulin, total non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), glycerol, 3-hydroxybutyrate and lactate. A subset of samples have been analysed for insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) (n = ∼2200). Details of the platforms used for biochemical analysis are provided in Table 2. Adiponectin is currently being analysed in all participants. A biorepository of aliquots (10–15 x 0.5 ml of both EDTA- and heparin-anticoagulated plasma as well as serum) is stored for future use.
Table 2

List of platforms used for biochemical tests

Biochemical testsAnalysis method/platform used
Fasting glucoseAnalysed using Instrumentation Laboratory IL TestTM kits on an ILab 600/650 clinical chemistry analysers (Werfen, Warrington, UK)
Total cholesterol
Triglycerides
HDL- and LDL-cholesterolAnalysed using Randox kits adapted for use on the Ilab 600/650 analysers (Randox Laboratories, Crumlin, Northern Ireland)
Non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA)
Apolipoprotein-B
Apolipoprotein A1
Glycerol
Lactate
3-hydroxybuthyrate
C-reactive proteinAnalysed using a Siemens ADVIA wide range CRP kit adapted for use on the Ilab 600/650 analysers. (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Camberley, UK)
Fasting insulinMillipore Human Insulin specific radioimmunoassay (Millipore UK, Watford, UK)
AdiponectinPerkin Elmer AlphaLisa Human Adiponectin kit (Waltham, MA, USA)
List of platforms used for biochemical tests

Metabolomics

The NMR-based metabolomics platform data containing ∼230 metabolites has been performed on ∼7100 Oxford biobank plasma samples. Additionally, the mass spectroscopy-based technology Metabolon® is available on a select set of 2250 samples on whom detailed DXA-acquired body composition data are available to study the association between specific fat depots and metabolome

Genomics

For each OBB participant, 3 × 5-ml aliquots of whole blood are collected and frozen at −80°C for isolation of genomic DNA. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array data have been generated using the Illumina Infinium Human Exome Beadchip 12v1 array platform for the first consecutive 5900 DNAs, and Affymetrix UK Biobank Axiom Array chip on the first consecutive 7500 participants. Beyond this, high throughput custom genotyping is facilitated by DNA being plated into 384-well format for typing on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT analyser using Applied Biosystems Taqman® SNP genotyping chemistries, or by LGC Genomics KASP™ custom assays using KASP genotyping chemistry.

Body composition and bone mineral density assessment

Body composition is assessed using GE Lunar iDXA and all data are analysed with Encore software (version 11.0; GE. Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA), which beyond regional body composition also includes an algorithm for quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT).

What has it found? Key findings and publications

The specific feature of the OBB is that all participants have provided informed consent to be re-contacted for follow-up studies. The cohort has therefore been used for both cross-sectional analyses as well as dedicated follow-up studies.

Findings from cross-sectional studies from the baseline data

The 7640 participants recruited so far in the OBB have a wide range of phenotypes that allow studying specific disease characteristics in relation to both their genotype and their phenotype. The percentages of various incident phenotypes at baseline, such as impaired fasting glucose (IFG), insulin resistance (IR), undiagnosed T2D and hypertension, overweight and obesity, are provided in Table 3. Results from various study designs are summarized below.
Table 3

Prevalence of incident cardio-metabolic phenotypes at baseline screening

PhenotypeTotal n*Male N (%)Total n*Female N (%)
Impaired fasting glucose3317983 (29.6)4307439 (10.2)
Hypertension3324610 (18.4)4316298 (6.9)
Hypertriglyceridaemia3317821 (24.6)4307295 (6.9)
Overweight32771486 (45.4)42681171 (27.4)
Obesity3277572 (17.4)4268641 (15.0)

Impaired fasting glucose: defined as fasting glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/l. Hypertension: defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 141 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg. Hypertriglyceridemia: defined based on ATP III cut-off of >1.7 mmol/l. Overweight: defined as BMI ≥ 25.0 to <29.9 kg/m2. Obesity: defined as BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2.

*N based on number of individuals for whom baseline values are available.

Prevalence of incident cardio-metabolic phenotypes at baseline screening Impaired fasting glucose: defined as fasting glucose ≥ 5.6 mmol/l. Hypertension: defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 141 or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg. Hypertriglyceridemia: defined based on ATP III cut-off of >1.7 mmol/l. Overweight: defined as BMI ≥ 25.0 to <29.9 kg/m2. Obesity: defined as BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2. *N based on number of individuals for whom baseline values are available.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS)

The focus of some of the key findings in the GWAS included identification of novel genetic variants associated with various disease-related phenotypes such as obesity, T2D, hyperglycaemic and hyperinsulinaemic traits, anthropometric traits, fat distribution and blood pressure., This was facilitated by collaborating with several international GWAS consortia such as the WTCCC, DIAGRAM, GIANT and the MAGIC consortia. Such efforts have helped identify several novel genetic variants associated with T2D, adiposity,,,, and CVD traits., Notably, the discovery of rs9939609 variant located in the first intron of FTO (fat mass- and obesity-associated) gene that predisposes to diabetes through an effect on body mass index (BMI), and the MC4R (melanocortin-4 receptor) genetic variant in common obesity risk, were early contributions of OBB data to obesity genetics.

Cross-sectional observational studies

The paradoxical association between upper body android and lower body gluteofemoral fat with CVD and T2D traits was shown using precise estimates of fat depot measured by DXA data among 3399 individuals. Using other imaging techniques such as ultrasound, quantification of subcutaneous abdominal tissue layers (SAT) into deep and superficial SAT and their functional differences have been reported. Studies involving postmenopausal women showed that abdominal obesity was characterized by increased CVD risk factors such as VLDL1‐TG and apoB production, hepatic fat and non‐HDL cholesterol, which has important implications for CVD risk in this group.

Recruit-by-phenotype (RbP) studies

With the rich abundance of data within the baseline OBB characterization, participants can be selected based on pre-defined phenotypic traits (Table 1) for investigations of complex intermediary phenotypes. These include both in vivo physiological studies and case-control studies. Several in vivo studies using OBB have aimed at understanding adipose tissue biology, investigations into the T2D- and CVD-protective properties of gluteofemoral fat, and fatty acid trafficking. Participants have been selected to take part in complex protocols to study the metabolic physiology of the femoral adipose tissue depot. Using stable isotope-labelled metabolic tracers combined with arterio-venous sampling techniques, it has been found that: (i) muscle and adipose tissue handle fatty acid uptake very differently; and (ii) gluteofemoral adipose depots exhibit lower lipolytic activity and, in relative terms, greater extraction of lipids from ectopic fat deposition. This could explain some of the CVD- and T2D-protective effects seen with expansion of this fat depot. Deep physiological characterization of patients with rare genetic conditions requires access to carefully matched healthy controls for which OBB participants have been used. Examples of this includes familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCHL), Chuvash polycythaemia, PTEN mutations and extreme high bone mass. Equally, in common disorders where pair-matching is essential for study design, OBB participants have been recruited as controls for studies of polycystic ovary syndrome, and insulin resistance.

Recruit-by-genotype studies (RbG)

The first use of OBB for RbG studies was the in vivo physiological characterization of adipose tissue function according to PPARG Pro12Ala carrier status among 42 age- and BMI-matched individuals. The matching for BMI was done to isolate the effect of metabolic phenotype by the PPARG genotype from a potential adiposity effect. Obese individuals carrying the T2D-protective Ala12 variant have higher adipose tissue blood flow than Pro12 carriers. The apolipoprotein-E (APOE) epsilon 4v variant is a risk gene variant for Alzheimer’s disease, which has been investigated for brain blood flow in relation to memory testing in age- and sex-matched participants from OBB. The physiological consequences of a PPP1R3A gene variant, identified in relation to digenic inheritance of partial lipodystrophy, was tested using the RbG concept. Besides metabolic disorders, the availability of large genotype data has also enabled the use of OBB in the investigation of other diseases. Using the RbG approach, we recently showed a protective homozygous trait for autoimmune diseases among carriers of tyrosine kinase-2 (TYK2). An updated list of publications from OBB is available at [https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=xPs_QwMAAAAJ].

What are the main strengths and weaknesses?

The strength of the cohort is in the triumvirate of detailed baseline characterization of a large random healthy population, the density of the genomic characterization and the recall capability. The cohort is not designed as a prospective follow-up cohort, and the phenotypic baseline characterization is dominated by metabolic measurements. The age range is limited to 30–50 years, and people with overt disease are excluded. We acknowledge that exclusion of T2DM and CVD cases enriched for genotypes of interest may introduce spurious associations due to collider effect and selection bias, particularly in genetic association studies and GWAS., Care would be taken to use appropriate statistical methods to account for such bias. However, these effects are likely to be reasonably small with the upper age limit being 50 years in the cohort.

Can I get hold of the data? Where can I find out more?

The OBB is open for collaborative studies with academic and commercial partners after research protocols have been accepted by the OBB steering committee. Rules of engagement and contact with the OBB team can be found on the website [www.oxfordbiobank.org.uk].

Funding

This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation from 2000 to 2003, by the Wellcome Trust from 2003 to 2009 and by the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre and the National NIHR Bioresource from 2007.
  48 in total

1.  Regulation of human metabolism by hypoxia-inducible factor.

Authors:  Federico Formenti; Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu; Yaso Emmanuel; Jane Cheeseman; Keith L Dorrington; Lindsay M Edwards; Sandy M Humphreys; Terence R J Lappin; Mary F McMullin; Christopher J McNamara; Wendy Mills; John A Murphy; David F O'Connor; Melanie J Percy; Peter J Ratcliffe; Thomas G Smith; Marilyn Treacy; Keith N Frayn; Paul L Greenhaff; Fredrik Karpe; Kieran Clarke; Peter A Robbins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Development of an arterio-venous difference method to study the metabolic physiology of the femoral adipose tissue depot.

Authors:  Siobhán E McQuaid; Konstantinos N Manolopoulos; A Louise Dennis; Jane Cheeseman; Fredrik Karpe; Keith N Frayn
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Fasted to fed trafficking of Fatty acids in human adipose tissue reveals a novel regulatory step for enhanced fat storage.

Authors:  Toralph Ruge; Leanne Hodson; Jane Cheeseman; A Louise Dennis; Barbara A Fielding; Sandy M Humphreys; Keith N Frayn; Fredrik Karpe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Global adiposity rather than abnormal regional fat distribution characterizes women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas M Barber; Stephen J Golding; Christopher Alvey; John A H Wass; Fredrik Karpe; Stephen Franks; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Heribert Schunkert; Inke R König; Sekar Kathiresan; Muredach P Reilly; Themistocles L Assimes; Hilma Holm; Michael Preuss; Alexandre F R Stewart; Maja Barbalic; Christian Gieger; Devin Absher; Zouhair Aherrahrou; Hooman Allayee; David Altshuler; Sonia S Anand; Karl Andersen; Jeffrey L Anderson; Diego Ardissino; Stephen G Ball; Anthony J Balmforth; Timothy A Barnes; Diane M Becker; Lewis C Becker; Klaus Berger; Joshua C Bis; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Eric Boerwinkle; Peter S Braund; Morris J Brown; Mary Susan Burnett; Ian Buysschaert; John F Carlquist; Li Chen; Sven Cichon; Veryan Codd; Robert W Davies; George Dedoussis; Abbas Dehghan; Serkalem Demissie; Joseph M Devaney; Patrick Diemert; Ron Do; Angela Doering; Sandra Eifert; Nour Eddine El Mokhtari; Stephen G Ellis; Roberto Elosua; James C Engert; Stephen E Epstein; Ulf de Faire; Marcus Fischer; Aaron R Folsom; Jennifer Freyer; Bruna Gigante; Domenico Girelli; Solveig Gretarsdottir; Vilmundur Gudnason; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Eran Halperin; Naomi Hammond; Stanley L Hazen; Albert Hofman; Benjamin D Horne; Thomas Illig; Carlos Iribarren; Gregory T Jones; J Wouter Jukema; Michael A Kaiser; Lee M Kaplan; John J P Kastelein; Kay-Tee Khaw; Joshua W Knowles; Genovefa Kolovou; Augustine Kong; Reijo Laaksonen; Diether Lambrechts; Karin Leander; Guillaume Lettre; Mingyao Li; Wolfgang Lieb; Christina Loley; Andrew J Lotery; Pier M Mannucci; Seraya Maouche; Nicola Martinelli; Pascal P McKeown; Christa Meisinger; Thomas Meitinger; Olle Melander; Pier Angelica Merlini; Vincent Mooser; Thomas Morgan; Thomas W Mühleisen; Joseph B Muhlestein; Thomas Münzel; Kiran Musunuru; Janja Nahrstaedt; Christopher P Nelson; Markus M Nöthen; Oliviero Olivieri; Riyaz S Patel; Chris C Patterson; Annette Peters; Flora Peyvandi; Liming Qu; Arshed A Quyyumi; Daniel J Rader; Loukianos S Rallidis; Catherine Rice; Frits R Rosendaal; Diana Rubin; Veikko Salomaa; M Lourdes Sampietro; Manj S Sandhu; Eric Schadt; Arne Schäfer; Arne Schillert; Stefan Schreiber; Jürgen Schrezenmeir; Stephen M Schwartz; David S Siscovick; Mohan Sivananthan; Suthesh Sivapalaratnam; Albert Smith; Tamara B Smith; Jaapjan D Snoep; Nicole Soranzo; John A Spertus; Klaus Stark; Kathy Stirrups; Monika Stoll; W H Wilson Tang; Stephanie Tennstedt; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Maciej Tomaszewski; Andre G Uitterlinden; Andre M van Rij; Benjamin F Voight; Nick J Wareham; George A Wells; H-Erich Wichmann; Philipp S Wild; Christina Willenborg; Jaqueline C M Witteman; Benjamin J Wright; Shu Ye; Tanja Zeller; Andreas Ziegler; Francois Cambien; Alison H Goodall; L Adrienne Cupples; Thomas Quertermous; Winfried März; Christian Hengstenberg; Stefan Blankenberg; Willem H Ouwehand; Alistair S Hall; Panos Deloukas; John R Thompson; Kari Stefansson; Robert Roberts; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ruth McPherson; Jeanette Erdmann; Nilesh J Samani
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Quantifying the extent to which index event biases influence large genetic association studies.

Authors:  Hanieh Yaghootkar; Michael P Bancks; Sam E Jones; Aaron McDaid; Robin Beaumont; Louise Donnelly; Andrew R Wood; Archie Campbell; Jessica Tyrrell; Lynne J Hocking; Marcus A Tuke; Katherine S Ruth; Ewan R Pearson; Anna Murray; Rachel M Freathy; Patricia B Munroe; Caroline Hayward; Colin Palmer; Michael N Weedon; James S Pankow; Timothy M Frayling; Zoltán Kutalik
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  LRP5 regulates human body fat distribution by modulating adipose progenitor biology in a dose- and depot-specific fashion.

Authors:  Nellie Y Loh; Matt J Neville; Kyriakoula Marinou; Sarah A Hardcastle; Barbara A Fielding; Emma L Duncan; Mark I McCarthy; Jonathan H Tobias; Celia L Gregson; Fredrik Karpe; Constantinos Christodoulides
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 27.287

8.  Genome-wide association scan meta-analysis identifies three Loci influencing adiposity and fat distribution.

Authors:  Cecilia M Lindgren; Iris M Heid; Joshua C Randall; Claudia Lamina; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Lu Qi; Elizabeth K Speliotes; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Cristen J Willer; Blanca M Herrera; Anne U Jackson; Noha Lim; Paul Scheet; Nicole Soranzo; Najaf Amin; Yurii S Aulchenko; John C Chambers; Alexander Drong; Jian'an Luan; Helen N Lyon; Fernando Rivadeneira; Serena Sanna; Nicholas J Timpson; M Carola Zillikens; Jing Hua Zhao; Peter Almgren; Stefania Bandinelli; Amanda J Bennett; Richard N Bergman; Lori L Bonnycastle; Suzannah J Bumpstead; Stephen J Chanock; Lynn Cherkas; Peter Chines; Lachlan Coin; Cyrus Cooper; Gabriel Crawford; Angela Doering; Anna Dominiczak; Alex S F Doney; Shah Ebrahim; Paul Elliott; Michael R Erdos; Karol Estrada; Luigi Ferrucci; Guido Fischer; Nita G Forouhi; Christian Gieger; Harald Grallert; Christopher J Groves; Scott Grundy; Candace Guiducci; David Hadley; Anders Hamsten; Aki S Havulinna; Albert Hofman; Rolf Holle; John W Holloway; Thomas Illig; Bo Isomaa; Leonie C Jacobs; Karen Jameson; Pekka Jousilahti; Fredrik Karpe; Johanna Kuusisto; Jaana Laitinen; G Mark Lathrop; Debbie A Lawlor; Massimo Mangino; Wendy L McArdle; Thomas Meitinger; Mario A Morken; Andrew P Morris; Patricia Munroe; Narisu Narisu; Anna Nordström; Peter Nordström; Ben A Oostra; Colin N A Palmer; Felicity Payne; John F Peden; Inga Prokopenko; Frida Renström; Aimo Ruokonen; Veikko Salomaa; Manjinder S Sandhu; Laura J Scott; Angelo Scuteri; Kaisa Silander; Kijoung Song; Xin Yuan; Heather M Stringham; Amy J Swift; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Manuela Uda; Peter Vollenweider; Gerard Waeber; Chris Wallace; G Bragi Walters; Michael N Weedon; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Cuilin Zhang; Weihua Zhang; Mark J Caulfield; Francis S Collins; George Davey Smith; Ian N M Day; Paul W Franks; Andrew T Hattersley; Frank B Hu; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Augustine Kong; Jaspal S Kooner; Markku Laakso; Edward Lakatta; Vincent Mooser; Andrew D Morris; Leena Peltonen; Nilesh J Samani; Timothy D Spector; David P Strachan; Toshiko Tanaka; Jaakko Tuomilehto; André G Uitterlinden; Cornelia M van Duijn; Nicholas J Wareham; Dawn M Waterworth; Michael Boehnke; Panos Deloukas; Leif Groop; David J Hunter; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; David Schlessinger; H-Erich Wichmann; Timothy M Frayling; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Joel N Hirschhorn; Ruth J F Loos; Kari Stefansson; Karen L Mohlke; Inês Barroso; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Structural and functional properties of deep abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue explain its association with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in men.

Authors:  Kyriakoula Marinou; Leanne Hodson; Senthil K Vasan; Barbara A Fielding; Rajarshi Banerjee; Kerstin Brismar; Michael Koutsilieris; Anne Clark; Matt J Neville; Fredrik Karpe
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Differences in partitioning of meal fatty acids into blood lipid fractions: a comparison of linoleate, oleate, and palmitate.

Authors:  Leanne Hodson; Siobhán E McQuaid; Fredrik Karpe; Keith N Frayn; Barbara A Fielding
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 4.310

View more
  19 in total

1.  Associations of Outdoor Temperature, Bright Sunlight, and Cardiometabolic Traits in Two European Population-Based Cohorts.

Authors:  Raymond Noordam; Ashna Ramkisoensing; Nellie Y Loh; Matt J Neville; Frits R Rosendaal; Ko Willems van Dijk; Diana van Heemst; Fredrik Karpe; Constantinos Christodoulides; Sander Kooijman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Investigating the relationships between unfavourable habitual sleep and metabolomic traits: evidence from multi-cohort multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analyses.

Authors:  Maxime M Bos; Neil J Goulding; Diana van Heemst; Raymond Noordam; Deborah A Lawlor; Matthew A Lee; Amy Hofman; Mariska Bot; René Pool; Lisanne S Vijfhuizen; Xiang Zhang; Chihua Li; Rima Mustafa; Matt J Neville; Ruifang Li-Gao; Stella Trompet; Marian Beekman; Nienke R Biermasz; Dorret I Boomsma; Irene de Boer; Constantinos Christodoulides; Abbas Dehghan; Ko Willems van Dijk; Ian Ford; Mohsen Ghanbari; Bastiaan T Heijmans; M Arfan Ikram; J Wouter Jukema; Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; Fredrik Karpe; Annemarie I Luik; L H Lumey; Arn M J M van den Maagdenberg; Simon P Mooijaart; Renée de Mutsert; Brenda W J H Penninx; Patrick C N Rensen; Rebecca C Richmond; Frits R Rosendaal; Naveed Sattar; Robert A Schoevers; P Eline Slagboom; Gisela M Terwindt; Carisha S Thesing; Kaitlin H Wade; Carolien A Wijsman; Gonneke Willemsen; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Regional fat depot masses are influenced by protein-coding gene variants.

Authors:  Matt J Neville; Laura B L Wittemans; Katherine E Pinnick; Marijana Todorčević; Risto Kaksonen; Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Jian'an Luan; Robert A Scott; Nicholas J Wareham; Claudia Langenberg; Fredrik Karpe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Body Fat Distribution and Systolic Blood Pressure in 10,000 Adults with Whole-Body Imaging: UK Biobank and Oxford BioBank.

Authors:  Deborah Malden; Ben Lacey; Jonathan Emberson; Fredrik Karpe; Naomi Allen; Derrick Bennett; Sarah Lewington
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Intrahepatic Fat and Postprandial Glycemia Increase After Consumption of a Diet Enriched in Saturated Fat Compared With Free Sugars.

Authors:  Siôn A Parry; Fredrik Rosqvist; Ferenc E Mozes; Thomas Cornfield; Matthew Hutchinson; Marie-Eve Piche; Andreas J Hülsmeier; Thorsten Hornemann; Pamela Dyson; Leanne Hodson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Comparison of regional fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional anthropometry and their association with markers of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  S K Vasan; C Osmond; D Canoy; C Christodoulides; M J Neville; C Di Gravio; C H D Fall; F Karpe
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein is differentially expressed in human subcutaneous adipose tissue and regulates adipogenesis.

Authors:  Nathan Denton; Katherine E Pinnick; Fredrik Karpe
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 7.422

8.  Sex Differences in Hepatic De Novo Lipogenesis with Acute Fructose Feeding.

Authors:  Wee Suan Low; Thomas Cornfield; Catriona A Charlton; Jeremy W Tomlinson; Leanne Hodson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Association of prolactin receptor (PRLR) variants with prolactinomas.

Authors:  Caroline M Gorvin; Paul J Newey; Angela Rogers; Victoria Stokes; Matt J Neville; Kate E Lines; Georgia Ntali; Peter Lees; Patrick J Morrison; Panagiotis N Singhellakis; Fotini Ch Malandrinou; Niki Karavitaki; Ashley B Grossman; Fredrik Karpe; Rajesh V Thakker
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Hepatic de novo lipogenesis is suppressed and fat oxidation is increased by omega-3 fatty acids at the expense of glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Charlotte J Green; Camilla Pramfalk; Catriona A Charlton; Pippa J Gunn; Thomas Cornfield; Michael Pavlides; Fredrik Karpe; Leanne Hodson
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.