Literature DB >> 30193136

The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations.

Laura M Amendola1, Jonathan S Berg2, Carol R Horowitz3, Frank Angelo1, Jeannette T Bensen4, Barbara B Biesecker5, Leslie G Biesecker6, Gregory M Cooper7, Kelly East7, Kelly Filipski8, Stephanie M Fullerton9, Bruce D Gelb10, Katrina A B Goddard11, Benyam Hailu12, Ragan Hart1, Kristen Hassmiller-Lich13, Galen Joseph14, Eimear E Kenny15, Barbara A Koenig16, Sara Knight17, Pui-Yan Kwok18, Katie L Lewis6, Amy L McGuire19, Mary E Norton20, Jeffrey Ou1, Donald W Parsons21, Bradford C Powell2, Neil Risch18, Mimsie Robinson22, Christine Rini23, Sarah Scollon24, Anne M Slavotinek25, David L Veenstra26, Melissa P Wasserstein27, Benjamin S Wilfond28, Lucia A Hindorff29, Sharon E Plon24, Gail P Jarvik30.   

Abstract

The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, now in its second funding cycle, is investigating the effectiveness of integrating genomic (exome or genome) sequencing into the clinical care of diverse and medically underserved individuals in a variety of healthcare settings and disease states. The consortium comprises a coordinating center, six funded extramural clinical projects, and an ongoing National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project. Collectively, these projects aim to enroll and sequence over 6,100 participants in four years. At least 60% of participants will be of non-European ancestry or from underserved settings, with the goal of diversifying the populations that are providing an evidence base for genomic medicine. Five of the six clinical projects are enrolling pediatric patients with various phenotypes. One of these five projects is also enrolling couples whose fetus has a structural anomaly, and the sixth project is enrolling adults at risk for hereditary cancer. The ongoing NHGRI intramural project has enrolled primarily healthy adults. Goals of the consortium include assessing the clinical utility of genomic sequencing, exploring medical follow up and cascade testing of relatives, and evaluating patient-provider-laboratory level interactions that influence the use of this technology. The findings from the CSER consortium will offer patients, healthcare systems, and policymakers a clearer understanding of the opportunities and challenges of providing genomic medicine in diverse populations and settings, and contribute evidence toward developing best practices for the delivery of clinically useful and cost-effective genomic sequencing in diverse healthcare settings.
Copyright © 2018 American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193136      PMCID: PMC6128306          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  56 in total

Review 1.  Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Marc Abramowicz; Fahd Al-Mulla; Warwick Anderson; Rudi Balling; Adam C Berger; Steven Bleyl; Aravinda Chakravarti; Wasun Chantratita; Rex L Chisholm; Vajira H W Dissanayake; Michael Dunn; Victor J Dzau; Bok-Ghee Han; Tim Hubbard; Anne Kolbe; Bruce Korf; Michiaki Kubo; Paul Lasko; Erkki Leego; Surakameth Mahasirimongkol; Partha P Majumdar; Gert Matthijs; Howard L McLeod; Andres Metspalu; Pierre Meulien; Satoru Miyano; Yaakov Naparstek; P Pearl O'Rourke; George P Patrinos; Heidi L Rehm; Mary V Relling; Gad Rennert; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Dan M Roden; Alan R Shuldiner; Sukdeb Sinha; Patrick Tan; Mats Ulfendahl; Robyn Ward; Marc S Williams; John E L Wong; Eric D Green; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Realizing the opportunities of genomics in health care.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Michael J Bamshad; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Defining personal utility in genomics: A Delphi study.

Authors:  J N Kohler; E Turbitt; K L Lewis; B S Wilfond; L Jamal; H L Peay; L G Biesecker; B B Biesecker
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Patient hopes for diagnostic genomic sequencing: roles of uncertainty and social status.

Authors:  Cynthia M Khan; Elizabeth G Moore; Cristina Leos; Christine Rini
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Myra I Roche; Denise L Perry; Sarah R Scollon; Ashley N Tomlinson; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Increasing participation in genomic research and biobanking through community-based capacity building.

Authors:  Elizabeth Gross Cohn; Maryam Husamudeen; Elaine L Larson; Janet K Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.

Authors:  Sara A Fowler; Carol J Saunders; Mark A Hoffman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Megan A Lewis; Alex Stine; Ryan S Paquin; Carol Mansfield; Dallas Wood; Christine Rini; Myra I Roche; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  46 in total

1.  Defining and Achieving Health Equity in Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Sonya Jooma; Michael J Hahn; Lucia A Hindorff; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  The Genomic Medicine Integrative Research Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Conducting Genomic Medicine Research.

Authors:  Carol R Horowitz; Lori A Orlando; Anne M Slavotinek; Josh Peterson; Frank Angelo; Barbara Biesecker; Vence L Bonham; Linda D Cameron; Stephanie M Fullerton; Bruce D Gelb; Katrina A B Goddard; Benyam Hailu; Ragan Hart; Lucia A Hindorff; Gail P Jarvik; Dave Kaufman; Eimear E Kenny; Sara J Knight; Barbara A Koenig; Bruce R Korf; Ebony Madden; Amy L McGuire; Jeffrey Ou; Melissa P Wasserstein; Mimsie Robinson; Howard Leventhal; Saskia C Sanderson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Challenges in returning results in a genomic medicine implementation study: the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) study.

Authors:  David C Kochan; Erin Winkler; Noralane Lindor; Gabriel Q Shaibi; Janet Olson; Pedro J Caraballo; Robert Freimuth; Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Richard R Sharp; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.617

4.  Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: A pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Robin Lee; Rena J Pasick; Claudia Guerra; Dean Schillinger; Sara Rubin
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Accurate, scalable cohort variant calls using DeepVariant and GLnexus.

Authors:  Taedong Yun; Helen Li; Pi-Chuan Chang; Michael F Lin; Andrew Carroll; Cory Y McLean
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Personalized Medicine and the Power of Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Noura S Abul-Husn; Eimear E Kenny
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Insurance coverage does not predict outcomes of genetic testing: The search for meaning in payer decisions for germline cancer tests.

Authors:  Laura M Amendola; M Ragan Hart; Robin L Bennett; Martha Horike-Pyne; Michael Dorschner; Brian Shirts; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Long overdue: including adults with brain disorders in precision health initiatives.

Authors:  Brenda M Finucane; Scott M Myers; Christa L Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies.

Authors:  Jill O Robinson; Julia Wynn; Barbara Biesecker; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara Bernhardt; Kyle B Brothers; Wendy K Chung; Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; M Ragan Hart; Ida Griesemer; Donald L Patrick; Christine Rini; David Veenstra; Angel M Cronin; Stacy W Gray
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Demonstrating 'respect for persons' in clinical research: findings from qualitative interviews with diverse genomics research participants.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft; Erin Rothwell; Seema K Shah; Devan M Duenas; Hannah Lewis; Kristin Muessig; Douglas J Opel; Katrina A B Goddard; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.