Literature DB >> 30180697

The effect of polarity order and electrode-activation order on loudness in cochlear implant users.

Ann E Todd1, David M Landsberger1.   

Abstract

This study examined the interaction between polarity and electrode-activation order on loudness in cochlear implant users. Pulses were presented with the polarity of the leading phase alternating or constant across channels. Electrode-activation order was either consecutive or staggered. Staggered electrode-activation orders required less current for equal loudness than consecutive orders with constant polarity. Consecutive electrode-activation orders required less current than staggered orders with alternating polarity. The results support the hypothesis that crosstalk between channels can interfere with or facilitate neuronal activation depending on polarity.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30180697      PMCID: PMC6086690          DOI: 10.1121/1.5049701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Effect of stimulus and recording parameters on spatial spread of excitation and masking patterns obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

4.  Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear.

Authors:  Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; John M Deeks; Christopher J Long; Johannes Lyzenga; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Polarity effects on place pitch and loudness for three cochlear-implant designs and at different cochlear sites.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Olivier Macherey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.

Authors:  E Favre; M Pelizzone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Loudness summation for two channels of stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of spatial and temporal separation.

Authors:  C M McKay; H J McDermott; G M Clark
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

9.  Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-20

10.  Loudness summation, masking, and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Y C Tong; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.