Literature DB >> 8509306

Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.

E Favre1, M Pelizzone.   

Abstract

Electrode interactions were investigated on two totally deaf patients fitted with the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Currents were applied to the most apical electrode (the 'perturbation' electrode) and their effects on psychophysical thresholds on the other electrodes (the 'test' electrodes) of the intracochlear array were studied. Two experimental protocols were used. In experiment I, we used a detection protocol to study how the perception of signals presented on each test electrode was affected by subthreshold, simultaneous or non-simultaneous stimulation of the perturbation electrode. Strong electrode interactions were observed with simultaneous stimulation and monotonically decreased as a function of electrode separation. Electrode interactions were weak with non-simultaneous stimulation. In experiment II, we used a discrimination protocol to study how the perception of signals presented on the test electrode was affected by suprathreshold, non-simultaneous stimulation of the perturbation electrode. Subjects could discriminate stimulation of 'perturbation+test' versus 'perturbation alone' when the level of stimulation on the test electrode was near threshold. These results demonstrate that strong electrode interactions in the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant system are generated by electrical field summation due to simultaneous stimulation of different electrodes, and that one can reduce electrode interactions by sequential activation of the electrodes. These observations might help to understand basic phenomena underlying recent significant improvements in speech recognition scores when switching from simultaneous to interleaved pulsatile stimulation in patients wearing the same cochlear implant system (Wilson et al., 1991).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8509306     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90136-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Raul Benítez; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  The effect of polarity order and electrode-activation order on loudness in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ann E Todd; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  Marc D Eisen; Kevin H Franck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

4.  Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Robert P Carlyon; Jacques Chatron; Stéphane Roman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-01-30

5.  Asymmetric pulses in cochlear implants: effects of pulse shape, polarity, and rate.

Authors:  Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; John M Deeks; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-20

6.  Psychophysical and physiological measures of electrical-field interaction in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Lisa J Stille
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Artificial balance: restoration of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans with a prototype vestibular neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  Angelica Perez Fornos; Nils Guinand; Raymond van de Berg; Robert Stokroos; Silvestro Micera; Herman Kingma; Marco Pelizzone; Jean-Philippe Guyot
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.