Literature DB >> 30171067

Prognostic Value of the Progesterone Receptor by Subtype in Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer.

Kathleen Van Asten1, Laurence Slembrouck1, Siel Olbrecht1,2, Lynn Jongen1, Olivier Brouckaert3, Hans Wildiers1,4, Giuseppe Floris5,6, Erik Van Limbergen1,7, Caroline Weltens1,7, Ann Smeets1,8, Robert Paridaens1,4, Anita Giobbie-Hurder9, Meredith M Regan9, Giuseppe Viale10, Beat Thürlimann11,12,13, Ignace Vergote1,2, Evangelia Christodoulou14, Ben Van Calster14, Patrick Neven15,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative breast cancers, the progesterone receptor (PR) is an independent prognostic marker. Little is known about the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade. We assessed this in two independent datasets. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with primary operable, invasive ER+ HER-2 negative breast cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, treated at University Hospitals Leuven, were included. We assessed the association of PR status and subtype (grade 1-2 vs. grade 3) with distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and breast cancer-specific survival. The interaction between PR status and subtype was investigated, and associations of PR status by subtype were calculated. The BIG 1-98 data set was used for validation.
RESULTS: In total, 4,228 patients from Leuven and 5,419 from BIG 1-98 were analyzed. In the Leuven cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of PR-positive versus PR-negative tumors for DRFI was 0.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.89). For the interaction with subtype (p = .34), the HR of PR status was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.61-1.01) in luminal A-like and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.46-0.76) in luminal B-like tumors. In luminal A-like tumors, observed 5-year cumulative incidences of distant recurrence were 4.1% for PR-negative and 2.8% for PR-positive tumors, and in luminal B-like 18.7% and 9.2%, respectively. In the BIG 1-98 cohort, similar results were observed; for the interaction with subtype (p = .12), the adjusted HR of PR status for DRFI was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.57-1.35) in luminal A-like and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.43-0.77) in luminal B-like tumors. Observed 5-year cumulative incidences were similar.
CONCLUSION: PR positivity may be more protective against metastatic relapse in luminal B-like versus luminal A-like breast cancer, but no strong conclusions can be made. In absolute risk, results suggest an absent PR is clinically more important in high compared with low proliferative ER+ HER-2 negative tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: An absent progesterone receptor (PR) predicts a worse outcome in women treated for an estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. As low proliferative tumors lacking PR are now also classified high risk, the prognostic value of PR across risk groups was studied. Despite a negative test for interaction of the prognostic value of PR by tumor grade, the magnitude of an absent PR on breast cancer relapse is much larger in high than in low proliferative breast cancers. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Breast cancer; Luminal; Progesterone receptor; Prognostic value; Subtype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30171067      PMCID: PMC6369957          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  32 in total

1.  Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  E Senkus; S Kyriakides; S Ohno; F Penault-Llorca; P Poortmans; E Rutgers; S Zackrisson; F Cardoso
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  20-Year Risks of Breast-Cancer Recurrence after Stopping Endocrine Therapy at 5 Years.

Authors:  Hongchao Pan; Richard Gray; Jeremy Braybrooke; Christina Davies; Carolyn Taylor; Paul McGale; Richard Peto; Kathleen I Pritchard; Jonas Bergh; Mitch Dowsett; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Molecular profiles of progesterone receptor loss in human breast tumors.

Authors:  Chad J Creighton; C Kent Osborne; Marc J van de Vijver; John A Foekens; Jan G Klijn; Hugo M Horlings; Dimitry Nuyten; Yixin Wang; Yi Zhang; Gary C Chamness; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Adrian V Lee; Rachel Schiff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases.

Authors:  Valerie-Jeanne Bardou; Grazia Arpino; Richard M Elledge; C Kent Osborne; Gary M Clark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Relevance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemical staining to Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Authors:  Lubna N Chaudhary; Zeeshan Jawa; Aniko Szabo; Alexis Visotcky; Christopher R Chitambar
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther       Date:  2016-01-18

8.  Prognostic value of a combined estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemical score and comparison with the Genomic Health recurrence score in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Mitch Dowsett; Silvia Pineda; Christopher Wale; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Lila Zabaglo; Elizabeth Mallon; Andrew R Green; Ian O Ellis; Anthony Howell; Aman U Buzdar; John F Forbes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prediction of the Oncotype DX recurrence score: use of pathology-generated equations derived by linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Molly E Klein; David J Dabbs; Yongli Shuai; Adam M Brufsky; Rachel Jankowitz; Shannon L Puhalla; Rohit Bhargava
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C U Cheang; Stephen K Chia; David Voduc; Dongxia Gao; Samuel Leung; Jacqueline Snider; Mark Watson; Sherri Davies; Philip S Bernard; Joel S Parker; Charles M Perou; Matthew J Ellis; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Genomic Profiling Data with Clinical Parameters: Implications for Breast Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  José A López-Ruiz; Jon A Mieza; Ignacio Zabalza; María D M Vivanco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Prognosticating 2-Year Survival Rate of Breast Cancer Patients Through Plasma miRNA-21 and Other Associating Factors.

Authors:  Pradana Zaky Romadhon; Ami Ashariati Prayoga; Siprianus Ugroseno Yudho Bintoro; Muhammad Noor Diansyah; Putu Niken Ayu Amrita; Merlyna Savitri; Satriyo Dwi Suryantoro; Kartika Prahasanti; Andi Yasmin Wijaya; Winona May Hendrata; Choirina Windradi; Bagus Aulia Mahdi; Krisnina Nurul Widiyastuti; Esthiningrum Dewi Agustin
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Neven; Giuseppe Floris; Laurence Slembrouck; Isabelle Vanden Bempt; Hans Wildiers; Ann Smeets; Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy; Chantal Van Ongeval; Lynn Jongen; Caroline Weltens; Kevin Punie; Griet Hoste; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen; Sileny Han; Ines Nevelsteen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study of 365 Cases in China.

Authors:  Boyue Han; Zhangyuan Gu; Zhebin Liu; Hong Ling
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  The impact of progesterone receptor expression on prognosis of patients with rapidly proliferating, hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the IBIS 3 trial.

Authors:  Sara Bravaccini; Giuseppe Bronte; Emanuela Scarpi; Sara Ravaioli; Roberta Maltoni; Anita Mangia; Maria Maddalena Tumedei; Maurizio Puccetti; Patrizia Serra; Lorenzo Gianni; Laura Amaducci; Nicoletta Biglia; Valentina Bounous; Angelo Virgilio Paradiso; Rosella Silvestrini; Dino Amadori; Andrea Rocca
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  High Prevalence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Southern Shaanxi Province, China.

Authors:  Xuemei Xing; Zhigang Fan; Yue Gao; Zheng Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.989

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.