Literature DB >> 33558657

Concordance between results of inexpensive statistical models and multigene signatures in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer.

Patrick Neven1,2, Giuseppe Floris3,4, Laurence Slembrouck5, Isabelle Vanden Bempt6, Hans Wildiers1,7, Ann Smeets1,8, Anne-Sophie Van Rompuy3,4, Chantal Van Ongeval3,9, Lynn Jongen1, Caroline Weltens1,10, Kevin Punie1,7, Griet Hoste2, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen1,2, Sileny Han1,2, Ines Nevelsteen1,8.   

Abstract

Multigene signatures (MGS) are used to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) decisions in patients diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer. We used results from three MGS (Oncotype DX® (ODX), MammaPrint® (MP) or Prosigna®) and assessed the concordance between high or low risk of recurrence and the predicted risk of recurrence based on statistical models. In addition, we looked at the impact of MGS results on final aCT administration during the multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). We retrospectively included 129 patients with ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer for which MGS testing was performed after MDM at University Hospitals Leuven between May 2013 and April 2019 in case there was doubt about aCT recommendation. Tumor tissue was analyzed either by ODX (N = 44), MP (N = 28), or Prosigna® (N = 57). Eight statistical models were computed: Magee equations (ME), Memorial Sloan Kettering simplified risk score (MSK-SRS), Breast Cancer Recurrence Score Estimator (BCRSE), OncotypeDXCalculator (ODXC), new Adjuvant! Online (nAOL), Mymammaprint.com (MyMP), PREDICT, and SiNK. Concordance, negative percent agreement, and positive percent agreement were calculated. Of 129 cases, 53% were MGS low and 47% MGS high risk. Concordances of 100.0% were observed between risk results obtained by ODX and ME. For MP, BCRSE demonstrated the best concordance, and for Prosigna® the average of ME. Concordances of <50.0% were observed between risk results obtained by ODX and nAOL, ODX and MyMP, ODX and SiNK, MP and MSK-SRS, MP and nAOL, MP and MyMP, MP and SiNK, and Prosigna® and ODXC. Integration of MGS results during MDM resulted in change of aCT recommendation in 47% of patients and a 15% relative and 9% absolute reduction. In conclusion, statistical models, especially ME and BCRSE, can be useful in selecting ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer patients who may need MGS testing resulting in enhanced cost-effectiveness and reduced delay in therapeutic decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33558657     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00743-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  51 in total

1.  Identifying clinically relevant prognostic subgroups of postmenopausal women with node-positive hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy: a combined analysis of ABCSG-8 and ATAC using the PAM50 risk of recurrence score and intrinsic subtype.

Authors:  M Gnant; I Sestak; M Filipits; M Dowsett; M Balic; E Lopez-Knowles; R Greil; P Dubsky; H Stoeger; M Rudas; R Jakesz; S Ferree; J W Cowens; T Nielsen; C Schaper; C Fesl; J Cuzick
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  MammaPrint and BluePrint Molecular Diagnostics Using Targeted RNA Next-Generation Sequencing Technology.

Authors:  Lorenza Mittempergher; Leonie J M J Delahaye; Anke T Witteveen; Jacob B Spangler; Fariet Hassenmahomed; Sammy Mee; Soufiane Mahmoudi; Jiang Chen; Simon Bao; Mireille H J Snel; Sandra Leidelmeijer; Naomi Besseling; Anne Bergstrom Lucas; Carlos Pabón-Peña; Sabine C Linn; Christa Dreezen; Diederik Wehkamp; Bob Y Chan; René Bernards; Laura J van 't Veer; Annuska M Glas
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.

Authors:  Ian Krop; Nofisat Ismaila; Fabrice Andre; Robert C Bast; William Barlow; Deborah E Collyar; M Elizabeth Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Antonio C Wolff; Vered Stearns
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Using multigene tests to select treatment for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Goncalves; Ron Bose
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin Filipits; Torsten O Nielsen; Margaretha Rudas; Richard Greil; Herbert Stöger; Raimund Jakesz; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Otto Dietze; Peter Regitnig; Christine Gruber-Rossipal; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Christian F Singer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Peter Dubsky; Thomas Bauernhofer; Michael Hubalek; Michael Knauer; Harald Trapl; Christian Fesl; Carl Schaper; Sean Ferree; Shuzhen Liu; J Wayne Cowens; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.

Authors:  Joel S Parker; Michael Mullins; Maggie C U Cheang; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Tammi Vickery; Sherri Davies; Christiane Fauron; Xiaping He; Zhiyuan Hu; John F Quackenbush; Inge J Stijleman; Juan Palazzo; J S Marron; Andrew B Nobel; Elaine Mardis; Torsten O Nielsen; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer: Evidence, Controversies, Consensus: Spectrum of Opinion of German Specialists on the 16th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference (Vienna 2019).

Authors:  Michael Untch; Christoph Thomssen; Ingo Bauerfeind; Michael Braun; Sara Y Brucker; Ricardo Felberbaum; Friederike Hagemann; Renate Haidinger; Arnd Hönig; Jens Huober; Christian Jackisch; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Thorsten Kühn; Diana Lüftner; Nicolai Maass; Toralf Reimer; Andreas Schneeweiss; Eva Schumacher-Wulf; Florian Schütz; Marc Thill; Rachel Wuerstlein; Peter A Fasching; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Decentralization of Next-Generation RNA Sequencing-Based MammaPrint® and BluePrint® Kit at University Hospitals Leuven and Curie Institute Paris.

Authors:  Laurence Slembrouck; Lauren Darrigues; Cecile Laurent; Lorenza Mittempergher; Leonie Jmj Delahaye; Isabelle Vanden Bempt; Sara Vander Borght; Liesbet Vliegen; Petra Sintubin; Virginie Raynal; Mylene Bohec; Cécile Reyes; Audrey Rapinat; Céline Helsmoortel; Lynn Jongen; Griet Hoste; Patrick Neven; Hans Wildiers; Ann Smeets; Ines Nevelsteen; Kevin Punie; Els Van Nieuwenhuysen; Sileny Han; Anne Vincent Salomon; Enora Laas Faron; Timothé Cynober; David Gentien; Sylvain Baulande; Mireille Hj Snel; Anke T Witteveen; Sari Neijenhuis; Annuska M Glas; Fabien Reyal; Giuseppe Floris
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.243

View more
  2 in total

1.  A hierarchical approach to combine histological grade and immunohistochemical factors to identify high-risk luminal breast cancers.

Authors:  Felipe Andrés Cordero da Luz; Eduarda da Costa Marinho; Camila Piqui Nascimento; Lara de Andrade Marques; Patrícia Ferreira Ribeiro Delfino; Rafael Mathias Antonioli; Rogério Agenor de Araújo; Marcelo José Barbosa Silva
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2022-05-04

2.  Development and Validation of a Simulation Model-Based Clinical Decision Tool: Identifying Patients Where 21-Gene Recurrence Score Testing May Change Decisions.

Authors:  Jinani Jayasekera; Joseph A Sparano; Suzanne O'Neill; Young Chandler; Claudine Isaacs; Allison W Kurian; Lawrence Kushi; Clyde B Schechter; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 50.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.