| Literature DB >> 30167240 |
Francesco Merola1, Pasquale Memmolo1, Lisa Miccio1, Roberto Savoia1, Martina Mugnano1, Angelo Fontana2, Giuliana D'Ippolito2, Angela Sardo2, Achille Iolascon3, Antonella Gambale3, Pietro Ferraro1.
Abstract
High-throughput single-cell analysis is a challenging task. Label-free tomographic phase microscopy is an excellent candidate to perform this task. However, in-line tomography is very difficult to implement in practice because it requires a complex set-up for rotating the sample and examining the cell along several directions. We demonstrate that by exploiting the random rolling of cells while they are flowing along a microfluidic channel, it is possible to obtain in-line phase-contrast tomography, if smart strategies for wavefront analysis are adopted. In fact, surprisingly, a priori knowledge of the three-dimensional position and orientation of rotating cells is no longer needed because this information can be completely retrieved through digital holography wavefront numerical analysis. This approach makes continuous-flow cytotomography suitable for practical operation in real-world, single-cell analysis and with a substantial simplification of the optical system; that is, no mechanical scanning or multi-direction probing is required. A demonstration is given for two completely different classes of biosamples: red blood cells and diatom algae. An accurate characterization of both types of cells is reported, despite their very different nature and material content, thus showing that the proposed method can be extended by adopting two alternate strategies of wavefront analysis to many classes of cells.Entities:
Keywords: microfluidics; red blood cells; tomographic microscopy; wavefront analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 30167240 PMCID: PMC6062169 DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2016.241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Light Sci Appl ISSN: 2047-7538 Impact factor: 17.782
Figure 1Working principles of the R-TPM approach. (a) Sketch of the experimental R-TPM set-up. Cells are injected into a microfluidic channel and tumble while flowing along the y-axis (inset of a). At the same time, a holographic image sequence is acquired. In the top-left corner of the inset, the reference system for cell tumbling is reported; in the top-right corner, a photo of the real set-up is shown. Rotation occurs around the x and z axes. BS, beam splitter; DM, dichroic mirror; MC, microchannel. (b) Flow chart representing the main steps of the two proposed algorithms for angle recovery and tomographic reconstruction.
Figure 2R-TPM for RBCs. (a–d) Results of R-TPM, applied on RBCs presenting morphological anomalies (H<0.9) with respect to the ideal healthy one: (a) one-side concavity, (b) speculated, (c) iron deficiency anemic and (d) thalassemic RBC. For each RBC, we report the QPIs and the mathematical dependence of the defocus coefficient from the rotation angle and the tomogram retrieved by the QPIs and the RI distributions at the z=0 and y=0 planes. ARI, V and CH are also reported together with the plastic 3D representations realized by a 3D printer. The maximum measured standard deviation of the RI obtained by this technique is 0.003.
Figure 3R-TPM for DA. (a–d) Skeletonema marinoi and (e–h) Thalassiosira rotula. (a, e) Two mirror QPMs used to define the rotating angle retrieval rule. (b, f) Calculated tomograms, where the central slices are shown (the complete tomographic scan is provided in Supplementary Movies 5 and 6). Inset figures in the green boxes show the whole tomogram shapes, highlighting the volume occupied by diatoms given by the parameter V. (c, g) are obtained from (b, f), respectively, by applying a RI threshold to extract the 3D distribution of the chloroplasts and their volume (Vchl). (d, h) Fluorescence images used for comparison. Inset figures in the red boxes show the typical bright-field microscope images of the two diatoms.