| Literature DB >> 30158452 |
Mariem Saada1, Hanen Falleh2, Marcelo D Catarino3, Susana M Cardoso4, Riadh Ksouri5.
Abstract
This work focuses on the variability of Retama raetam (Forssk.) Webb bioactive compounds as a function of the plant cycle. The main results showed that it exhibited the highest percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids, along with superior levels of vitamin C and total phenolic compounds (66.49%, 645.6 mg·100 g-¹ FW and 23.9 mg GAE·g-¹, respectively) at the vegetative stage. Instead, at the flowering and mature fruiting stages, R. raetam (Forssk.) Webb exhibited notable contents of proline (25.4 μmol·g-¹ DW) and carotenoids (27.2 μg·g-¹ FW), respectively. The gathered data concerning the antioxidant activity highlighted the effectiveness of the vegetative stage in comparison to the other periods. Actually, IC50 and EC50 values of the hydromethanolic extract obtained from the plant shoots at the vegetative stage were of 23, 380, 410, 1160 and 960 μg·mL-1 (DPPH• and ABTS•+ radicals scavenging activity, reducing power, chelating power and β-carotene bleaching activity, respectively). Furthermore, the four studied stages showed appreciable antibacterial capacities against human pathogens with a higher efficiency of the vegetative stage extract. Finally, the LC-DAD-ESI/MSn analysis revealed the predominance of isoflavonoids as main class of phenolic compounds and demonstrates that individual phenolic biosynthesis was clearly different as a function of plant growth. These findings highlight that reaching the optimum efficiency of R. raetam (Forssk.) Webb is closely linked to the physiological stage.Entities:
Keywords: GC-MS; LC-DAD-ESI/MSn; Retama raetam; biological activities; lipophilic and hydrophilic compounds; physiological stage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30158452 PMCID: PMC6225163 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23092177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1R. raetam (Forssk.) Webb different growth stages: aerial parts of the plant at the vegetative stage (a) and details from reproductive stages, namely flowers at the flowering stage (b), green fruits at fresh fruiting stage (c), and mature fruits at mature fruiting stage (d).
Carotenoids (μg·g−1 FW) and fatty acid composition (relative %) in shoots of Retama raetam (Forssk.) Webb at different grown stages.
| Vegetative Stage | Flowering Stage | Fresh Fruiting Stage | Mature Fruiting Stage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 16.67 ± 0.02 b | 9.72 ± 0.03 c | 2.67 ± 0.02 d | 27.19 ± 0.06 a |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Lauric acid C12:0 | 3.68 ± 0.18 a | 2.36 ± 0.12 b | - | 0.04 ± 0.00 c |
| Myristic acid C14:0 | 1.51 ± 0.07 a | 1.13 ± 0.05 a | - | 0.16 ± 0.01 b |
| Pentadecylic acid C15:0 | - | - | 25.38 ± 1.27 a | 0.08 ± 0.00 b |
| Palmitic acid C16:0 | 19.10 ± 0.95 b | 20.52 ± 1.02 a | 12.2 ± 0.61 c | 12.23 ± 0.61 c |
| Margaric acid C17:0 | 0.52 ± 0.02 b | - | - | 1.28 ± 0.06 a |
| Stearic acid C18:0 | 3.66 ± 0.18 b | 4.63 ± 0.23 a | 2.39 ± 0.12 c | 4.14 ± 0.11 a |
| Arachidic acid C20:0 | - | 6.10 ± 0.30 a | - | 0.5 ± 0.21 b |
| Heneicosanoic acid C21:0 | - | 1 ± 0.05 | - | - |
| Behenic acid C22:0 | 2.24 ± 0.11 a | - | - | 0.18 ± 0.01 b |
|
| ||||
| Oleic acid C18 :1 | - | - | - | 24.97 ± 1.25 |
| Linoleic acid C18:2 | 22.72 ± 1.13 b | 18.80 ± 0.94 c | 18.75 ± 0.94 c | 49.85 ± 2.49 a |
| α-linolenic acid C18:3 | 43.77 ± 2.18 b | 45.37 ± 2.26 a | 38.67 ± 1.93 c | 3.99 ± 0.19 d |
|
| 30.71 ± 1.53 c | 34.74 ±1.74 b | 39.97 ± 1.99 a | 18.61 ± 0.93 d |
|
| - | - | - | 24 .97 ±1.25 |
|
| 66.49 ± 3.32 a | 64.17 ± 3.02 b | 57.42 ± 2.87 c | 53.84 ± 2.69 d |
SFA—saturated fatty acids; MUFA—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA—polyunsaturated fatty acids. Mean values ± S.D.; Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan test. In each line different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Principal components analysis of different stages based on the fatty acid composition of Retama raetam (Forssk.) Webb (Table 1).
Contents of ascorbic acid, proline, and total phenolic compounds (TPC) of Retama raetam (Forssk.) Webb shoots at different grown stages.
| Vegetative Stage | Flowering Stage | Fresh Fruiting Stage | Mature Fruiting Stage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 645.61 ± 0.15 a | 627 ± 0.18 b | 367 ± 0.17 c | 103.2 ± 0.00 d |
|
| 173.2 ± 0.01 b | 184.5 ± 0.01 a | 130.6 ± 0.03 c | 101.2 ± 0.00 d |
|
| 472.45 ± 0.01 a | 442.51 ± 0.05 b | 236.27 ± 0.07 c | 2.01 ± 0.06 d |
|
| 12.1 ± 0.03 b | 25.4 ± 0.01 a | 11.23 ± 0.01 c | 1.56 ± 0.01 d |
|
| 23.93 ± 0.03 a | 20.75 ± 0.02 b | 18.23 ± 0.02 b | 15.17 ± 0.02 c |
Mean values ± S.D.; Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan test. In each line, different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Chromatographic profiles of R. raetam (Forssk.) Webb hydromethanolic extracts from different seasons: (A) vegetative; (B) flowering; (C) fresh fruiting; and (D) mature fruiting stages recorded at 280 nm. Peak numbers correspond to those represented in Table 3.
Identification and quantification of the main compounds from the four R. raetam (Forssk.) Webb stages by UHPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn.
| Peak | RT (min) | λmax (nm) | [M − H]− ( | ESI-MSn Fragments | Proposed Compounds | Mean Content (μg/g Dry Plant Material) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vegetative Stage | Flowering Stage | Fresh Fruiting Stage | Mature Fruiting Stage | ||||||
|
| 1.45 | 303 | 133 | MS2[133]: | Malic acid | + | + | + | + |
|
| 1.74 | 227, 304 | 191 | MS2[191]: | Citric acid | + | + | + | + |
|
| 3.63 | 223, 275 | 255 | MS2[255]: | Piscidic acid | + | + | + | + |
|
| 9.68 | 271, 334 | 593 | MS2[593]: | Vicenin 2 | ND | ND | tc | + |
|
| 10.26 | 255 | 491* | MS2[491]: | Calycosin- | + | + | + | ND |
|
| 10. 39 | 261 | 563 | MS2[563]: | Genistein- | + | + | + | ND |
|
| 11.07 | 261 | 431 | MS2[431]: | Genistein-8- | 888.53 ± 24.57 a | 571.74 ± 60.94 c | 628.19 ± 10.68 b | + |
|
| 11.93 | 262 | 461 | MS2[461]: | Tectorigenin-8- | + | + | + | ND |
|
| 11.98 | 289 | 303 | MS2[303]: | Taxifolin | ND | ND | + | 224.92 ± 4.03 |
|
| 12.30 | 260, sh325 | 477* | MS2[477]: | Genistin | tc | 867.17 ± 44.21 | + | ND |
|
| 12.82 | 262, sh324 | 575 | MS2[575]: | Genistein-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaroyl | + | + | + | tc |
|
| 13.24 | 267, 336 | 431 | MS2[431]: | Apigenin-7- | ND | + | ND | ND |
|
| 14.87 | 231, 307 | 805 | MS2[805]: | ND | ND | ND | + | |
|
| 17.43 | 261, sh331 | 269 | MS2[269]: | Genistein | ND | + | ND | ND |
|
| 22.40 | 282 | 311 | MS2[311]: | Unkown | + | + | + | ND |
tc, traces; ND, not detected; +, detected but not quantified; *, detected as [M − H + HCOOH]− adducts. Mean values ± S.D.; Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan test. In each line different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Total antioxidant activity (TAA), DPPH• test, ABTS•+ assay, reducing power, chelating power and β-carotene bleaching activity) of the hydromethanolic extracts from Retama raetam (Forssk.) Webb shoots of different grown stages.
| Vegetative Stage | Flowering Stage | Fresh Fruiting Stage | Mature Fruiting Stage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 55.6 ± 0.04 a | 32.3 ± 0.02 c | 26.02 ± 0.02 d | 43.73 ± 0.03 b |
|
| 23 ± 0.01 a | 160 ± 0.01 d | 68 ± 0.00 c | 20.5 ± 0.00 b |
|
| 380 ± 0.02 a | 940 ± 0.01 d | 780 ± 0.00 c | 540 ± 0.01 b |
|
| 410 ± 0.00 a | 2500 ± 0.01 d | 2300 ± 0.01 c | 805 ± 0.00 b |
|
| 1160 ± 0.01 a | 12,292 ± 0.03 d | 11,933 ± 0.00 c | 7600 ± 0.02 b |
|
| 960 ± 0.01 a | 8500 ± 0.00 d | 7700 ± 0.00 c | 3100 ± 0.00 b |
Mean values ± S.D.; Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan test. In each line different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Antibacterial activity of Retama raetam (Forssk.) Webb shoots (at 100 mg·mL) at different grown stages against fourteen human pathogenic bacteria.
| Bacterial Strains | Vegetative Stage | Flowering Stage | Fresh Fruiting Stage | Mature Fruiting Stage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
|
| ATCC 14579 | 12 ± 0.00 a | 12 ± 0.57 a | 9 ± 0.57 a | 10 ± 1.00 a |
|
| ATCC 25923 | - | - | - | - |
|
| CIP 106510 | - | - | - | - |
|
| ATCC 19115 | 9 ± 0.57 d | 8 ± 0.57 c | - | 7 ± 0.00 d |
|
| ATCC 29212 | 10 ± 0.57 c | 9 ± 1.15 b | 8 ± 0.00 b | - |
|
| NCIMB 8166 | 9 ± 0.57 d | 9 ± 0.57 b | 9 ± 0.57 a | 9 ± 0.57 b |
|
| |||||
|
| ATCC 85218 | - | - | - | - |
|
| ATCC 27853 | - | - | - | - |
|
| ATCC 1408 | - | - | - | - |
|
| ATCC 7566 | 9 ± 0.00 d | 8 ± 0.57 c | 9 ± 0.57 a | 9 ± 0.00 b |
|
| ATCC 27962T | 11 ± 1.15 b | 9 ± 0.57 b | - | - |
|
| ATCC 33787 | 9 ± 0.57 d | 9 ± 0.57 b | 8 ± 0.57 b | 8 ± 0.00 c |
|
| non-O1 IPT | 9 ± 0.00 d | 8 ± 1.00 c | - | - |
|
| ATCC 17802 | - | - | - | - |
Inhibition zone (IZ) calculated as diameter around the disc (mm). The diameter of disc was 6 mm. No antimicrobial activity (–), inhibition zone < 1 mm. Weak inhibition zone, inhibition zone 1 mm. Slight antimicrobial activity, inhibition zone 2 to 3 mm. Moderate antimicrobial activity, inhibition zone 4 to 5 mm. High antimicrobial activity, inhibition zone 6 to 9 mm. Strong antimicrobial activity, inhibition zone > 9 mm. Mean values ± S.D.; Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan test. In each line different letters mean significant differences (p < 0.05).