| Literature DB >> 30142930 |
Harley Naumann1, Rebecka Sepela2, Aira Rezaire3, Sonia E Masih4, Wayne E Zeller5, Laurie A Reinhardt6, Jamison T Robe7, Michael L Sullivan8, Ann E Hagerman9.
Abstract
Previous studies showed that a series of purified condensed tannins (CTs) from warm-season perennial legumes exhibited high variability in their modulation of methane production during in vitro rumen digestion. The molecular weight differences between these CTs did not provide correlation with either the in vitro CH₄ production or the ability to precipitate bovine serum albumin. In an effort to delineate other structure-activity relationships from these methane abatement experiments, the structures of purified CTs from these legumes were assessed with a combination of methanolysis, quantitative thiolysis, ¹H-13C HSQC NMR spectroscopy and ultrahigh-resolution MALDI-TOF MS. The composition of these CTs is very diverse: procyanidin/prodelphinidin (PC/PD) ratios ranged from 98/2 to 2/98; cis/trans ratios ranged from 98/2 to 34/66; mean degrees of polymerization ranged from 6 to 39; and % galloylation ranged from 0 to 75%. No strong correlation was observed between methane production and the protein precipitation capabilities of the CT towards three different proteins (BSA, lysozyme, and alfalfa leaf protein) at ruminal pH. However, a strong non-linear correlation was observed for the inhibition of methane production versus the antioxidant activity in plant sample containing typical PC- and PD-type CTs. The modulation of methane production could not be correlated to the CT structure (PC/PD or cis/trans ratios and extent of galloylation). The most active plant in methane abatement was Acacia angustissima, which contained CT, presenting an unusual challenge as it was resistant to standard thiolytic degradation conditions and exhibited an atypical set of cross-peak signals in the 2D NMR. The MALDI analysis supported a 5-deoxy flavan-3-ol-based structure for the CT from this plant.Entities:
Keywords: Acacia; NMR spectroscopy; ORAC assay; antioxidant; condensed tannins; forage legume; proanthocyanidins; thiolysis; ultrahigh-resolution negative mode MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30142930 PMCID: PMC6225215 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23092123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Common representation of condensed tannin structures. Left structure: PC = procyanidin; catechin (trans isomer) or epicatechin (cis isomer). PD = Prodelphinidin; gallocatechin (trans isomer) or epigallocatechin (cis isomer). In addition, hydroxyl groups, particularly on the C-3 hydroxyl, may be esterified with a galloyl (G) group (structure on the right). Carbons 2, 3, and 4 of the C ring, 2′ and 6′ of the B ring, 6 and 8 of the A ring, and 2” and 6” of the D ring are labeled.
Dry land Texas legumes (Fabaceae) used in this study.
| Plant | Subfamily | Subtribe | λmax in HCl-Methanol (nm) | Methane Production 1 (g/kg DM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papilionoideae | - | 543 | 7.9 | |
| Papilionoideae | - | 543 | 4.9 | |
| Papilionoideae | - | 547 | 15.1 | |
| Mimosoideae | Mimoseae | 547 | 7.6 | |
| Mimosoideae | Mimoseae | 547 | 24.9 | |
| Mimosoideae | Mimoseae | 547 | 19.7 | |
| Mimosoideae | Mimoseae | 538 | 40.7 | |
| Mimosoideae | Acacieae | 508 | 0.6 | |
| Mimosoideae | Acacieae | 505 | 0.8 |
1 Data from in vitro fermentations, in g methane per kg dry matter (DM) [23].
Comparison of structural information obtained from thiolysis and 1H-13C HSQC NMR.
| Plant Sample | PC/PD Ratio | % Galloyl | mDP | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiol | NMR | Thiol | NMR H/C-4 | NMR H/C-2 | Thiol | NMR H/C-4 | NMR H/C-2′,5′ | Thiol | NMR | |
| 55/45 | 52.5/47.5 | 90/10 | 87.8/12.2 | 84.2/15.8 | None | None | None | 18.6 | ND 1 | |
| 42/58 | 41.4/58.6 | 44/56 | 34.8/65.2 | 33.9/66.1 | 3 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 9.3 | 6.7 | |
| 8/92 | 4.3/95.7 | 80/20 | 82.1/17.9 | 75.4/24.6 | None | ND 2 | 5.3 | 10.6 | 9.1 | |
| 15/85 | 15.3/84.7 | 89/11 | ND 3 | ND 4 | 40 | 50.8 | ND 5 | 7.6 | 6.1 | |
| 3/97 | 1.8/98.2 | 98/2 | ND 3 | 96.2/3.8 | 75 | 76.2 | 87.5 | 6.0 | 5.97 | |
| 12/88 | 8.2/91.8 | 93/7 | ND 3 | 91.5/8.5 | 32 | 34.4 | 25.6 | 11.5 | 8.1 | |
| 99/1 | 98.6/1.4 | 98/2 | ND 3 | ND 4 | 29 | 21.3 | 34.3 | 39.2 | 6.3 | |
ND, not determined. 1 Low signal to noise ratio on terminal C-H cross-peak signal. 2 Low signal to noise ratio for H/C-4 cross-peak signal. 3 Due to galloylation of the CT sample, cis/trans assignments become ambiguous using H/C-4 cross-peaks. 4 Low signal to noise ratio for the trans H/C-2 cross-peak signal. 5 Integration of peaks indicated > 100 mol % galloylation.
Figure 2Representative ultrahigh resolution negative mode MALDI-MS data for CT. The top spectrum was obtained with CT from Desmanthus illinoensis and the bottom spectrum with CT from Acacia angustissima. The mass intervals between the clusters of peaks represent the characteristic subunits for the CT, with an interval of 304 typical of (epi)gallocatechin, an interval of 272 typical of fisetinidol, and an interval of 152 typical of gallate ester modification.
Interval between clusters of peaks in MALDI spectra 1.
| Flavan-3-ol | - | (Epi)afzelechin | (Epi)catechin | Epi(gallocatechin) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-Deoxy Flavan-3-ol | Guibourtinidol | Fisetinidol | Robinetinidol | - | Gallate Ester |
| Plant Sample | 256.07 | 272.07 | 288.06 | 304.06 | 152.01 |
| - | - | ++ | ++ | - | |
| - | - | ++ | ++ | + | |
| - | - | + | ++ | - | |
| - | - | + | ++ | ++ | |
| - | + | + | ++ | + | |
| - | - | ++ | - | + | |
| + | ++ | + | - | + |
1 CT from Mimosa strigillosa was not available when the analysis was performed. 2 Both ecotypes of Acacia had the same peaks on MALDI-MS.
Selected MALDI signals and their exact assignments. The polymers comprise the flavan-3-ol subunits (epi)catechin (cat), (epi)gallocatechin (gallocat); the 5-deoxy flavan-3-ol subunits guibourtinidol (gui), fisetinidol (fis) and, in some cases, gallate esters (gallate) 1.
| Plant Sample | Observed Mass | Formula | Exact Mass | Error (ppm) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2065.43585 | C105H85O45 | 2065.43630 | 0.22 | cat4-gallocat3 | |
| 1473.31433 | C75H61O32 | 1473.31461 | 0.19 | cat3-gallocat2 | |
| 1825.36676 | C90H73O42 | 1825.35766 | 4.99 | gallocat6 | |
| 1369.22063 | C66H49O33 | 1369.21562 | 3.66 | gallocat3-gallate3 | |
| 3025.55520 | C135H125O80 | 3025.55958 | 1.45 | cat-gallocat8-gallate2 | |
| 1745.34814 | C89H69O38 | 1745.34670 | 0.83 | cat5-gallate2 | |
| 1241.29289 | C67H53O24 | 1241.29269 | 0.17 | cat-gui-fis2-gallate |
1 CT from Mimosa strigillosa was not available when the analysis was performed. 2 Both ecotypes of Acacia had the same peaks on MALDI-MS.
Figure 3Relationship between methane production [23] and antioxidant activity for the forages. The non-linear exponential fit (Y = 11.64(exp(−0.772X)) + 0.6433) does not include the Acacia CT data (red markers). The points are average for the ORAC method (n = 3) and the in vitro gas production (n = 3) and the error bars indicate standard deviations.