Nuo Tong1,2, Shuiping Gou1, Shuyuan Yang1, Dan Ruan2, Ke Sheng2. 1. Key Lab of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710071, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is commonly employed for treating head and neck (H&N) cancer with uniform tumor dose and conformal critical organ sparing. Accurate delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) on H&N CT images is thus essential to treatment quality. Manual contouring used in current clinical practice is tedious, time-consuming, and can produce inconsistent results. Existing automated segmentation methods are challenged by the substantial inter-patient anatomical variation and low CT soft tissue contrast. To overcome the challenges, we developed a novel automated H&N OARs segmentation method that combines a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) with a shape representation model (SRM). METHODS: Based on manually segmented H&N CT, the SRM and FCNN were trained in two steps: (a) SRM learned the latent shape representation of H&N OARs from the training dataset; (b) the pre-trained SRM with fixed parameters were used to constrain the FCNN training. The combined segmentation network was then used to delineate nine OARs including the brainstem, optic chiasm, mandible, optical nerves, parotids, and submandibular glands on unseen H&N CT images. Twenty-two and 10 H&N CT scans provided by the Public Domain Database for Computational Anatomy (PDDCA) were utilized for training and validation, respectively. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (SEN), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% maximum surface distance (95%SD) were calculated to quantitatively evaluate the segmentation accuracy of the proposed method. The proposed method was compared with an active appearance model that won the 2015 MICCAI H&N Segmentation Grand Challenge based on the same dataset, an atlas method and a deep learning method based on different patient datasets. RESULTS: An average DSC = 0.870 (brainstem), DSC = 0.583 (optic chiasm), DSC = 0.937 (mandible), DSC = 0.653 (left optic nerve), DSC = 0.689 (right optic nerve), DSC = 0.835 (left parotid), DSC = 0.832 (right parotid), DSC = 0.755 (left submandibular), and DSC = 0.813 (right submandibular) were achieved. The segmentation results are consistently superior to the results of atlas and statistical shape based methods as well as a patch-wise convolutional neural network method. Once the networks are trained off-line, the average time to segment all 9 OARs for an unseen CT scan is 9.5 s. CONCLUSION: Experiments on clinical datasets of H&N patients demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed deep neural network segmentation method for multi-organ segmentation on volumetric CT scans. The accuracy and robustness of the segmentation were further increased by incorporating shape priors using SMR. The proposed method showed competitive performance and took shorter time to segment multiple organs in comparison to state of the art methods.
PURPOSE: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is commonly employed for treating head and neck (H&N) cancer with uniform tumor dose and conformal critical organ sparing. Accurate delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) on H&N CT images is thus essential to treatment quality. Manual contouring used in current clinical practice is tedious, time-consuming, and can produce inconsistent results. Existing automated segmentation methods are challenged by the substantial inter-patient anatomical variation and low CT soft tissue contrast. To overcome the challenges, we developed a novel automated H&N OARs segmentation method that combines a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) with a shape representation model (SRM). METHODS: Based on manually segmented H&N CT, the SRM and FCNN were trained in two steps: (a) SRM learned the latent shape representation of H&N OARs from the training dataset; (b) the pre-trained SRM with fixed parameters were used to constrain the FCNN training. The combined segmentation network was then used to delineate nine OARs including the brainstem, optic chiasm, mandible, optical nerves, parotids, and submandibular glands on unseen H&N CT images. Twenty-two and 10 H&N CT scans provided by the Public Domain Database for Computational Anatomy (PDDCA) were utilized for training and validation, respectively. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity (SEN), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% maximum surface distance (95%SD) were calculated to quantitatively evaluate the segmentation accuracy of the proposed method. The proposed method was compared with an active appearance model that won the 2015 MICCAI H&N Segmentation Grand Challenge based on the same dataset, an atlas method and a deep learning method based on different patient datasets. RESULTS: An average DSC = 0.870 (brainstem), DSC = 0.583 (optic chiasm), DSC = 0.937 (mandible), DSC = 0.653 (left optic nerve), DSC = 0.689 (right optic nerve), DSC = 0.835 (left parotid), DSC = 0.832 (right parotid), DSC = 0.755 (left submandibular), and DSC = 0.813 (right submandibular) were achieved. The segmentation results are consistently superior to the results of atlas and statistical shape based methods as well as a patch-wise convolutional neural network method. Once the networks are trained off-line, the average time to segment all 9 OARs for an unseen CT scan is 9.5 s. CONCLUSION: Experiments on clinical datasets of H&N patients demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed deep neural network segmentation method for multi-organ segmentation on volumetric CT scans. The accuracy and robustness of the segmentation were further increased by incorporating shape priors using SMR. The proposed method showed competitive performance and took shorter time to segment multiple organs in comparison to state of the art methods.
Authors: Jennifer Breunig; Sophy Hernandez; Jeffrey Lin; Stacy Alsager; Christine Dumstorf; Jennifer Price; Jennifer Steber; Richard Garza; Suneel Nagda; Edward Melian; Bahman Emami; John C Roeske Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-05-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Patrik F Raudaschl; Paolo Zaffino; Gregory C Sharp; Maria Francesca Spadea; Antong Chen; Benoit M Dawant; Thomas Albrecht; Tobias Gass; Christoph Langguth; Marcel Lüthi; Florian Jung; Oliver Knapp; Stefan Wesarg; Richard Mannion-Haworth; Mike Bowes; Annaliese Ashman; Gwenael Guillard; Alan Brett; Graham Vincent; Mauricio Orbes-Arteaga; David Cárdenas-Peña; German Castellanos-Dominguez; Nava Aghdasi; Yangming Li; Angelique Berens; Kris Moe; Blake Hannaford; Rainer Schubert; Karl D Fritscher Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Karl D Fritscher; Marta Peroni; Paolo Zaffino; Maria Francesca Spadea; Rainer Schubert; Gregory Sharp Journal: Med Phys Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Pim Moeskops; Max A Viergever; Adrienne M Mendrik; Linda S de Vries; Manon J N L Benders; Ivana Isgum Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 10.048