Literature DB >> 30713130

Automatic Breast and Fibroglandular Tissue Segmentation in Breast MRI Using Deep Learning by a Fully-Convolutional Residual Neural Network U-Net.

Yang Zhang1, Jeon-Hor Chen2, Kai-Ting Chang1, Vivian Youngjean Park3, Min Jung Kim3, Siwa Chan4, Peter Chang1, Daniel Chow1, Alex Luk1, Tiffany Kwong1, Min-Ying Su5.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Breast segmentation using the U-net architecture was implemented and tested in independent validation datasets to quantify fibroglandular tissue volume in breast MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two datasets were used. The training set was MRI of 286 patients with unilateral breast cancer. The segmentation was done on the contralateral normal breasts. The ground truth for the breast and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) was obtained by using a template-based segmentation method. The U-net deep learning algorithm was implemented to analyze the training set, and the final model was obtained using 10-fold cross-validation. The independent validation set was MRI of 28 normal volunteers acquired using four different MR scanners. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), voxel-based accuracy, and Pearson's correlation were used to evaluate the performance.
RESULTS: For the 10-fold cross-validation in the initial training set of 286 patients, the DSC range was 0.83-0.98 (mean 0.95 ± 0.02) for breast and 0.73-0.97 (mean 0.91 ± 0.03) for FGT; and the accuracy range was 0.92-0.99 (mean 0.98 ± 0.01) for breast and 0.87-0.99 (mean 0.97 ± 0.01) for FGT. For the entire 224 testing breasts of the 28 normal volunteers in the validation datasets, the mean DSC was 0.86 ± 0.05 for breast, 0.83 ± 0.06 for FGT; and the mean accuracy was 0.94 ± 0.03 for breast and 0.93 ± 0.04 for FGT. The testing results for MRI acquired using four different scanners were comparable.
CONCLUSION: Deep learning based on the U-net algorithm can achieve accurate segmentation results for the breast and FGT on MRI. It may provide a reliable and efficient method to process large number of MR images for quantitative analysis of breast density.
Copyright © 2019 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast segmentation; Deep learning; U-net algorithm; breast MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30713130      PMCID: PMC6669125          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  45 in total

Review 1.  A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI.

Authors:  Uros Vovk; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Template-based automatic breast segmentation on MRI by excluding the chest region.

Authors:  Muqing Lin; Jeon-Hor Chen; Xiaoyong Wang; Siwa Chan; Siping Chen; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Kevin Strobel; Hans H Schild; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Heribert B Bieling
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A new bias field correction method combining N3 and FCM for improved segmentation of breast density on MRI.

Authors:  Muqing Lin; Siwa Chan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Daniel Chang; Ke Nie; Shih-Ting Chen; Cheng-Ju Lin; Tzu-Ching Shih; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring.

Authors:  Michiel Kallenberg; Kersten Petersen; Mads Nielsen; Andrew Y Ng; Christian Igel; Celine M Vachon; Katharina Holland; Rikke Rass Winkel; Nico Karssemeijer; Martin Lillholm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index.

Authors:  Kelly H Zou; Simon K Warfield; Aditya Bharatha; Clare M C Tempany; Michael R Kaus; Steven J Haker; William M Wells; Ferenc A Jolesz; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Quantitative analysis of peri-tumor fat in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Yang Zhang; Siwa Chan; Ruey-Feng Chang; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

9.  A computerized volumetric segmentation method applicable to multi-centre MRI data to support computer-aided breast tissue analysis, density assessment and lesion localization.

Authors:  Gokhan Ertas; Simon J Doran; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Bilateral symmetry of breast tissue composition by magnetic resonance in young women and adults.

Authors:  S Hennessey; E Huszti; A Gunasekura; A Salleh; L Martin; S Minkin; S Chavez; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.506

View more
  19 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Geraldine J Liao; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Rhea D Chitalia; Despina Kontos; Linda Moy; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Estimation of the capillary level input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast using a deep learning approach.

Authors:  Jonghyun Bae; Zhengnan Huang; Florian Knoll; Krzysztof Geras; Terlika Pandit Sood; Li Feng; Laura Heacock; Linda Moy; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Supracellular measurement of spatially varying mechanical heterogeneities in live monolayers.

Authors:  Alexandra Bermudez; Zachary Gonzalez; Bao Zhao; Ethan Salter; Xuanqing Liu; Leixin Ma; Mohammad Khalid Jawed; Cho-Jui Hsieh; Neil Y C Lin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 6.  Current and Emerging Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Apekshya Chhetri; Xin Li; Joseph V Rispoli
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-12

7.  Multiparametric deep learning tissue signatures for a radiological biomarker of breast cancer: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Vishwa S Parekh; Katarzyna J Macura; Susan C Harvey; Ihab R Kamel; Riham Ei-Khouli; David A Bluemke; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Automatic segmentation of uterine endometrial cancer on multi-sequence MRI using a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Kurata; Mizuho Nishio; Yusaku Moribata; Aki Kido; Yuki Himoto; Satoshi Otani; Koji Fujimoto; Masahiro Yakami; Sachiko Minamiguchi; Masaki Mandai; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  DBT Masses Automatic Segmentation Using U-Net Neural Networks.

Authors:  Xiaobo Lai; Weiji Yang; Ruipeng Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Deep learning enables automated volumetric assessments of cardiac function in zebrafish.

Authors:  Alexander A Akerberg; Caroline E Burns; C Geoffrey Burns; Christopher Nguyen
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.