Literature DB >> 33029634

A slice classification model-facilitated 3D encoder-decoder network for segmenting organs at risk in head and neck cancer.

Shuming Zhang1, Hao Wang1, Suqing Tian1, Xuyang Zhang1,2, Jiaqi Li1,3, Runhong Lei1, Mingze Gao4, Chunlei Liu4, Li Yang4, Xinfang Bi4, Linlin Zhu4, Senhua Zhu4, Ting Xu5, Ruijie Yang1.   

Abstract

For deep learning networks used to segment organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck (H&N) cancers, the class-imbalance problem between small volume OARs and whole computed tomography (CT) images results in delineation with serious false-positives on irrelevant slices and unnecessary time-consuming calculations. To alleviate this problem, a slice classification model-facilitated 3D encoder-decoder network was developed and validated. In the developed two-step segmentation model, a slice classification model was firstly utilized to classify CT slices into six categories in the craniocaudal direction. Then the target categories for different OARs were pushed to the different 3D encoder-decoder segmentation networks, respectively. All the patients were divided into training (n = 120), validation (n = 30) and testing (n = 20) datasets. The average accuracy of the slice classification model was 95.99%. The Dice similarity coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance, respectively, for each OAR were as follows: right eye (0.88 ± 0.03 and 1.57 ± 0.92 mm), left eye (0.89 ± 0.03 and 1.35 ± 0.43 mm), right optic nerve (0.72 ± 0.09 and 1.79 ± 1.01 mm), left optic nerve (0.73 ± 0.09 and 1.60 ± 0.71 mm), brainstem (0.87 ± 0.04 and 2.28 ± 0.99 mm), right temporal lobe (0.81 ± 0.12 and 3.28 ± 2.27 mm), left temporal lobe (0.82 ± 0.09 and 3.73 ± 2.08 mm), right temporomandibular joint (0.70 ± 0.13 and 1.79 ± 0.79 mm), left temporomandibular joint (0.70 ± 0.16 and 1.98 ± 1.48 mm), mandible (0.89 ± 0.02 and 1.66 ± 0.51 mm), right parotid (0.77 ± 0.07 and 7.30 ± 4.19 mm) and left parotid (0.71 ± 0.12 and 8.41 ± 4.84 mm). The total segmentation time was 40.13 s. The 3D encoder-decoder network facilitated by the slice classification model demonstrated superior performance in accuracy and efficiency in segmenting OARs in H&N CT images. This may significantly reduce the workload for radiation oncologists.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic segmentation; deep learning; head and neck; organs at risk; radiotherapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33029634      PMCID: PMC7779351          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  23 in total

1.  Learning-Based Multi-Label Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound Images for Prostate Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Saman Nouranian; Mahdi Ramezani; Ingrid Spadinger; William J Morris; Septimu E Salcudean; Purang Abolmaesumi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Evaluation of segmentation methods on head and neck CT: Auto-segmentation challenge 2015.

Authors:  Patrik F Raudaschl; Paolo Zaffino; Gregory C Sharp; Maria Francesca Spadea; Antong Chen; Benoit M Dawant; Thomas Albrecht; Tobias Gass; Christoph Langguth; Marcel Lüthi; Florian Jung; Oliver Knapp; Stefan Wesarg; Richard Mannion-Haworth; Mike Bowes; Annaliese Ashman; Gwenael Guillard; Alan Brett; Graham Vincent; Mauricio Orbes-Arteaga; David Cárdenas-Peña; German Castellanos-Dominguez; Nava Aghdasi; Yangming Li; Angelique Berens; Kris Moe; Blake Hannaford; Rainer Schubert; Karl D Fritscher
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  AnatomyNet: Deep learning for fast and fully automated whole-volume segmentation of head and neck anatomy.

Authors:  Wentao Zhu; Yufang Huang; Liang Zeng; Xuming Chen; Yong Liu; Zhen Qian; Nan Du; Wei Fan; Xiaohui Xie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Deep convolutional neural network for segmentation of thoracic organs-at-risk using cropped 3D images.

Authors:  Xue Feng; Kun Qing; Nicholas J Tustison; Craig H Meyer; Quan Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gregory Sharp; Karl D Fritscher; Vladimir Pekar; Marta Peroni; Nadya Shusharina; Harini Veeraraghavan; Jinzhong Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Fully automatic multi-organ segmentation for head and neck cancer radiotherapy using shape representation model constrained fully convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Nuo Tong; Shuiping Gou; Shuyuan Yang; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Bulat Ibragimov; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Rapid advances in auto-segmentation of organs at risk and target volumes in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  M Kosmin; J Ledsam; B Romera-Paredes; R Mendes; S Moinuddin; D de Souza; L Gunn; C Kelly; C O Hughes; A Karthikesalingam; C Nutting; R A Sharma
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  IMRT for head and neck cancer: reducing xerostomia and dysphagia.

Authors:  XiaoShen Wang; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool.

Authors:  Abdel Aziz Taha; Allan Hanbury
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  3 in total

1.  Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation.

Authors:  John C Asbach; Anurag K Singh; L Shawn Matott; Anh H Le
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  A feasibility study for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT using Monte Carlo dose calculation and deep learning-based modelling of EPID detector response.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Zhibiao Cheng; Ziting Fan; Qilin Zhang; Xile Zhang; Ruijie Yang; Junhai Wen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  Review of Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Xi Liu; Kai-Wen Li; Ruijie Yang; Li-Sheng Geng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.