Literature DB >> 30134726

Protein-ligand binding enthalpies from near-millisecond simulations: Analysis of a preorganization paradox.

Amanda Li1, Michael K Gilson2.   

Abstract

Calorimetric studies of protein-ligand binding sometimes yield thermodynamic data that are difficult to understand. Today, molecular simulations can be used to seek insight into such calorimetric puzzles, and, when simulations and experiments diverge, the results can usefully motivate further improvements in computational methods. Here, we apply near-millisecond duration simulations to estimate the relative binding enthalpies of four peptidic ligands with the Grb2 SH2 domain. The ligands fall into matched pairs, where one member of each pair has an added bond that preorganizes the ligand for binding and thus may be expected to favor binding entropically, due to a smaller loss in configurational entropy. Calorimetric studies have shown that the constrained ligands do in fact bind the SH2 domain more tightly than the flexible ones, but, paradoxically, the improvement in affinity for the constrained ligands is enthalpic, rather than entropic. The present enthalpy calculations yield the opposite trend, as they suggest that the flexible ligands bind more exothermically. Additionally, the small relative binding enthalpies are found to be balances of large differences in the energies of structural components such as ligand and the binding site residues. As a consequence, the deviations from experiment in the relative binding enthalpies represent small differences between these large numbers and hence may be particularly susceptible to error, due, for example, to approximations in the force field. We also computed first-order estimates of changes in configurational entropy on binding. These too are, arguably, paradoxical, as they tend to favor binding of the flexible ligands. The paradox is explained in part by the fact that the more rigid constrained ligands reduce the entropy of binding site residues more than their flexible analogs do, at least in the simulations. This result offers a rather general counterargument to the expectation that preorganized ligands should be associated with more favorable binding entropies, other things being equal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30134726      PMCID: PMC5962444          DOI: 10.1063/1.5027439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  48 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  New estimators for calculating solvation entropy and enthalpy and comparative assessments of their accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Andreas Vitalis; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 3.  Adding calorimetric data to decision making in lead discovery: a hot tip.

Authors:  John E Ladbury; Gerhard Klebe; Ernesto Freire
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Thermodynamic and structural effects of conformational constraints in protein-ligand interactions. Entropic paradoxy associated with ligand preorganization.

Authors:  John E DeLorbe; John H Clements; Martin G Teresk; Aaron P Benfield; Hilary R Plake; Laura E Millspaugh; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Robert Abel; Lingle Wang; Edward D Harder; B J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  The R.E.D. tools: advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building.

Authors:  François-Yves Dupradeau; Adrien Pigache; Thomas Zaffran; Corentin Savineau; Rodolphe Lelong; Nicolas Grivel; Dimitri Lelong; Wilfried Rosanski; Piotr Cieplak
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.676

7.  Thermodynamic and Structural Effects of Macrocyclization as a Constraining Method in Protein-Ligand Interactions.

Authors:  John E Delorbe; John H Clements; Benjamin B Whiddon; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.345

8.  Conformational constraint in protein ligand design and the inconsistency of binding entropy.

Authors:  D Gomika Udugamasooriya; Mark R Spaller
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery.

Authors:  David W Borhani; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  H++ 3.0: automating pK prediction and the preparation of biomolecular structures for atomistic molecular modeling and simulations.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Boris Aguilar; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Some thermodynamic effects of varying nonpolar surfaces in protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  David L Cramer; Bo Cheng; Jianhua Tian; John H Clements; Rachel M Wypych; Stephen F Martin
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 6.514

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.