Literature DB >> 28677954

Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.

Robert Abel1, Lingle Wang1, Edward D Harder1, B J Berne2, Richard A Friesner2.   

Abstract

A principal goal of drug discovery project is to design molecules that can tightly and selectively bind to the target protein receptor. Accurate prediction of protein-ligand binding free energies is therefore of central importance in computational chemistry and computer aided drug design. Multiple recent improvements in computing power, classical force field accuracy, enhanced sampling methods, and simulation setup have enabled accurate and reliable calculations of protein-ligands binding free energies, and position free energy calculations to play a guiding role in small molecule drug discovery. In this Account, we outline the relevant methodological advances, including the REST2 (Replica Exchange with Solute Temperting) enhanced sampling, the incorporation of REST2 sampling with convential FEP (Free Energy Perturbation) through FEP/REST, the OPLS3 force field, and the advanced simulation setup that constitute our FEP+ approach, followed by the presentation of extensive comparisons with experiment, demonstrating sufficient accuracy in potency prediction (better than 1 kcal/mol) to substantially impact lead optimization campaigns. The limitations of the current FEP+ implementation and best practices in drug discovery applications are also discussed followed by the future methodology development plans to address those limitations. We then report results from a recent drug discovery project, in which several thousand FEP+ calculations were successfully deployed to simultaneously optimize potency, selectivity, and solubility, illustrating the power of the approach to solve challenging drug design problems. The capabilities of free energy calculations to accurately predict potency and selectivity have led to the advance of ongoing drug discovery projects, in challenging situations where alternative approaches would have great difficulties. The ability to effectively carry out projects evaluating tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of proposed drug candidates, is potentially transformative in enabling hard to drug targets to be attacked, and in facilitating the development of superior compounds, in various dimensions, for a wide range of targets. More effective integration of FEP+ calculations into the drug discovery process will ensure that the results are deployed in an optimal fashion for yielding the best possible compounds entering the clinic; this is where the greatest payoff is in the exploitation of computer driven design capabilities. A key conclusion from the work described is the surprisingly robust and accurate results that are attainable within the conventional classical simulation, fixed charge paradigm. No doubt there are individual cases that would benefit from a more sophisticated energy model or dynamical treatment, and properties other than protein-ligand binding energies may be more sensitive to these approximations. We conclude that an inflection point in the ability of MD simulations to impact drug discovery has now been attained, due to the confluence of hardware and software development along with the formulation of "good enough" theoretical methods and models.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28677954     DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  45 in total

1.  Protein-ligand binding enthalpies from near-millisecond simulations: Analysis of a preorganization paradox.

Authors:  Amanda Li; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; David S Cerutti; Dan Mermelstein; Charles Lin; Scott LeGrand; Timothy J Giese; Adrian Roitberg; David A Case; Ross C Walker; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Boosting Free-Energy Perturbation Calculations with GPU-Accelerated NAMD.

Authors:  Haochuan Chen; Julio D C Maia; Brian K Radak; David J Hardy; Wensheng Cai; Christophe Chipot; Emad Tajkhorshid
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Steven Murkli; John N McNeill; Wei Yao; Matthew Sullivan; Michael K Gilson; Michael W Chiu; Lyle Isaacs; Bruce C Gibb; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Improving the Accuracy of Protein Thermostability Predictions for Single Point Mutations.

Authors:  Jianxin Duan; Dmitry Lupyan; Lingle Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Escaping Atom Types in Force Fields Using Direct Chemical Perception.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Caitlin C Bannan; Andrea Rizzi; Christopher I Bayly; John D Chodera; Victoria T Lim; Nathan M Lim; Kyle A Beauchamp; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael K Gilson; Peter K Eastman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Reduced Free Energy Perturbation/Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Method with Unbiased Alchemical Thermodynamic Axis.

Authors:  Wei Jiang; Jonathan Thirman; Sunhwan Jo; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Potent Antimalarials with Development Potential Identified by Structure-Guided Computational Optimization of a Pyrrole-Based Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor Series.

Authors:  Michael J Palmer; Xiaoyi Deng; Shawn Watts; Goran Krilov; Aleksey Gerasyuto; Sreekanth Kokkonda; Farah El Mazouni; John White; Karen L White; Josefine Striepen; Jade Bath; Kyra A Schindler; Tomas Yeo; David M Shackleford; Sachel Mok; Ioanna Deni; Aloysus Lawong; Ann Huang; Gong Chen; Wen Wang; Jaya Jayaseelan; Kasiram Katneni; Rahul Patil; Jessica Saunders; Shatrughan P Shahi; Rajesh Chittimalla; Iñigo Angulo-Barturen; María Belén Jiménez-Díaz; Sergio Wittlin; Patrick K Tumwebaze; Philip J Rosenthal; Roland A Cooper; Anna Caroline Campos Aguiar; Rafael V C Guido; Dhelio B Pereira; Nimisha Mittal; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Diana R Tomchick; Benoît Laleu; Jeremy N Burrows; Pradipsinh K Rathod; David A Fidock; Susan A Charman; Margaret A Phillips
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  AMOEBA binding free energies for the SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest challenge.

Authors:  Yuanjun Shi; Marie L Laury; Zhi Wang; Jay W Ponder
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.