Literature DB >> 32916312

Some thermodynamic effects of varying nonpolar surfaces in protein-ligand interactions.

David L Cramer1, Bo Cheng1, Jianhua Tian1, John H Clements1, Rachel M Wypych1, Stephen F Martin2.   

Abstract

Understanding how making structural changes in small molecules affects their binding affinities for targeted proteins is central to improving strategies for rational drug design. To assess the effects of varying the nature of nonpolar groups upon binding entropies and enthalpies, we designed and prepared a set of Grb2-SH2 domain ligands, Ac-pTyr-Ac6c-Asn-(CH2)n-R, in which the size and electrostatic nature of R groups at the pTyr+3 site were varied. The complexes of these ligands with the Grb2-SH2 domain were evaluated in a series of studies in which the binding thermodynamics were determined using isothermal titration calorimetry, and binding interactions were examined in crystallographic studies of two different complexes. Notably, adding nonpolar groups to the pTyr+3 site leads to higher binding affinities, but the magnitude and energetic origins of these effects vary with the nature of the R substituent. For example, enhancements to binding affinities using aliphatic R groups are driven by more favorable changes in binding entropies, whereas aryl R groups improve binding free energies through a combination of more favorable changes in binding enthalpies and entropies. However, enthalpy/entropy compensation plays a significant role in these associations and mitigates against any significant variation in binding free energies, which vary by only 0.8 kcal•mol-1, with changes in the electrostatic nature and size of the R group. Crystallographic studies show that differences in ΔG° or ΔH° correlate with buried nonpolar surface area, but they do not correlate with the total number of polar or van der Waals contacts. The relative number of ordered water molecules and relative order in the side chains at pTyr+3 correlate with differences in -TΔS°. Overall, these studies show that burial of nonpolar surface can lead to enhanced binding affinities arising from dominating entropy- or enthalpy-driven hydrophobic effects, depending upon the electrostatic nature of the apolar R group.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grb2 SH2 domain; Hydrophobic effects; Protein-ligand interactions; Thermodynamics; isothermal titration calorimetry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32916312      PMCID: PMC7680455          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Chem        ISSN: 0223-5234            Impact factor:   6.514


  50 in total

1.  Heat capacity changes upon burial of polar and nonpolar groups in proteins.

Authors:  V V Loladze; D N Ermolenko; G I Makhatadze
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Molecular recognition by SH2 domains.

Authors:  J Michael Bradshaw; Gabriel Waksman
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  2002

3.  Hydrophobic tendencies of polar groups as a major force in molecular recognition.

Authors:  Tigran V Chalikian
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  Strong solute-solute dispersive interactions in a protein-ligand complex.

Authors:  Richard Malham; Sarah Johnstone; Richard J Bingham; Elizabeth Barratt; Simon E V Phillips; Charles A Laughton; Steve W Homans
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Thermodynamic inhibition profile of a cyclopentyl and a cyclohexyl derivative towards thrombin: the same but for different reasons.

Authors:  Christof Gerlach; Michael Smolinski; Holger Steuber; Christoph A Sotriffer; Andreas Heine; David G Hangauer; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Lowering the entropic barrier for binding conformationally flexible inhibitors to enzymes.

Authors:  A R Khan; J C Parrish; M E Fraser; W W Smith; P A Bartlett; M N James
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode.

Authors:  Z Otwinowski; W Minor
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Interplay between Conformational Entropy and Solvation Entropy in Protein-Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Verteramo; Olof Stenström; Majda Misini Ignjatović; Octav Caldararu; Martin A Olsson; Francesco Manzoni; Hakon Leffler; Esko Oksanen; Derek T Logan; Ulf J Nilsson; Ulf Ryde; Mikael Akke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Strategies for Late-Stage Optimization: Profiling Thermodynamics by Preorganization and Salt Bridge Shielding.

Authors:  Anna Sandner; Tobias Hüfner-Wulsdorf; Andreas Heine; Torsten Steinmetzer; Gerhard Klebe
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  The binding cavity of mouse major urinary protein is optimised for a variety of ligand binding modes.

Authors:  Thelma A Pertinhez; Elena Ferrari; Emanuela Casali; Jital A Patel; Alberto Spisni; Lorna J Smith
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.575

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discovery of Rift Valley fever virus natural pan-inhibitors by targeting its multiple key proteins through computational approaches.

Authors:  Israr Fatima; Sajjad Ahmad; Mubarak A Alamri; Muhammad Usman Mirza; Muhammad Tahir Ul Qamar; Abdur Rehman; Farah Shahid; Eid A Alatawi; Faris F Aba Alkhayl; Wafa Abdullah Al-Megrin; Ahmad Almatroudi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Effect of Tetraphenylborate on Physicochemical Properties of Bovine Serum Albumin.

Authors:  Ola Grabowska; Małgorzata M Kogut; Krzysztof Żamojć; Sergey A Samsonov; Joanna Makowska; Aleksandra Tesmar; Katarzyna Chmur; Dariusz Wyrzykowski; Lech Chmurzyński
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.