Literature DB >> 30104434

The impact of environmental interventions among mouse siblings on the heritability and malleability of general cognitive ability.

Bruno Sauce1, Sophie Bendrath2, Margalit Herzfeld2, Dan Siegel2, Conner Style2, Sayeeda Rab2, Jonathan Korabelnikov2, Louis D Matzel3.   

Abstract

General cognitive ability can be highly heritable in some species, but at the same time, is very malleable. This apparent paradox could potentially be explained by gene-environment interactions and correlations that remain hidden due to experimental limitations on human research and blind spots in animal research. Here, we shed light on this issue by combining the design of a sibling study with an environmental intervention administered to laboratory mice. The analysis included 58 litters of four full-sibling genetically heterogeneous CD-1 male mice, for a total of 232 mice. We separated the mice into two subsets of siblings: a control group (maintained in standard laboratory conditions) and an environmental-enrichment group (which had access to continuous physical exercise and daily exposure to novel environments). We found that general cognitive ability in mice has substantial heritability (24% for all mice) and is also malleable. The mice that experienced the enriched environment had a mean intelligence score that was 0.44 standard deviations higher than their siblings in the control group (equivalent to gains of 6.6 IQ points in humans). We also found that the estimate of heritability changed between groups (55% in the control group compared with non-significant 15% in the enrichment group), analogous to findings in humans across socio-economic status. Unexpectedly, no evidence of gene-environment interaction was detected, and so the change in heritability might be best explained by higher environmental variance in the enrichment group. Our findings, as well as the 'sibling intervention procedure' for mice, may be valuable to future research on the heritability, mechanisms and evolution of cognition.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  environment intervention; heritability; individual differences; intelligence; malleability; mouse

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30104434      PMCID: PMC6107568          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  33 in total

Review 1.  Neural consequences of environmental enrichment.

Authors:  H van Praag; G Kempermann; F H Gage
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Individual differences in the expression of a "general" learning ability in mice.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Yu Ray Han; Henya Grossman; Meghana S Karnik; Dave Patel; Nicholas Scott; Steven M Specht; Chetan C Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The external-internal loop of interference: two types of attention and their influence on the learning abilities of mice.

Authors:  Bruno Sauce; Christopher Wass; Andrew Smith; Stephanie Kwan; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 5.  Use it or lose it: how neurogenesis keeps the brain fit for learning.

Authors:  T J Shors; M L Anderson; D M Curlik; M S Nokia
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Additive effects of physical exercise and environmental enrichment on adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Klaus Fabel; Susanne A Wolf; Dan Ehninger; Harish Babu; Perla Leal-Galicia; Gerd Kempermann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  A dopaminergic gene cluster in the prefrontal cortex predicts performance indicative of general intelligence in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Christopher D Wass; Danielle Colas-Zelin; Debasri Roy; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The evolution of general intelligence.

Authors:  Judith M Burkart; Michèle N Schubiger; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 9.  Individual differences: Case studies of rodent and primate intelligence.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Bruno Sauce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  Dopamine D1 sensitivity in the prefrontal cortex predicts general cognitive abilities and is modulated by working memory training.

Authors:  Christopher Wass; Alessandro Pizzo; Bruno Sauce; Yushi Kawasumi; Tudor Sturzoiu; Fred Ree; Tim Otto; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more
  8 in total

1.  How general is cognitive ability in non-human animals? A meta-analytical and multi-level reanalysis approach.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Poirier; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Julie Morand-Ferron; Vincent Careau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Cauchoix; P K Y Chow; J O van Horik; C M Atance; E J Barbeau; G Barragan-Jason; P Bize; A Boussard; S D Buechel; A Cabirol; L Cauchard; N Claidière; S Dalesman; J M Devaud; M Didic; B Doligez; J Fagot; C Fichtel; J Henke-von der Malsburg; E Hermer; L Huber; F Huebner; P M Kappeler; S Klein; J Langbein; E J G Langley; S E G Lea; M Lihoreau; H Lovlie; L D Matzel; S Nakagawa; C Nawroth; S Oesterwind; B Sauce; E A Smith; E Sorato; S Tebbich; L J Wallis; M A Whiteside; A Wilkinson; A S Chaine; J Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Questioning the developmental effects of group size on cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Connor T Lambert; Kendra B Sewall; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Among-individual differences in auditory and physical cognitive abilities in zebra finches.

Authors:  Connor T Lambert; Prateek K Sahu; Christopher B Sturdy; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.926

5.  Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Joah R Madden; Julie Morand-Ferron; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Enrico Sorato; Josefina Zidar; Laura Garnham; Alastair Wilson; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Paola Galdi; Lynn K Paul; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Stress hormones, social associations and song learning in zebra finches.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Robert F Lachlan; Karen A Spencer; Christopher N Templeton; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.