Literature DB >> 30104430

Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Enrico Sorato1, Josefina Zidar2, Laura Garnham2, Alastair Wilson3, Hanne Løvlie2.   

Abstract

Natural selection can act on between-individual variation in cognitive abilities, yet evolutionary responses depend on the presence of underlying genetic variation. It is, therefore, crucial to determine the relative extent of genetic versus environmental control of these among-individual differences in cognitive traits to understand their causes and evolutionary potential. We investigated heritability of associative learning performance and of a cognitive judgement bias (optimism), as well as their covariation, in a captive pedigree-bred population of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus, n > 300 chicks over 5 years). We analysed performance in discriminative and reversal learning (two facets of associative learning), and cognitive judgement bias, by conducting animal models to disentangle genetic from environmental contributions. We demonstrate moderate heritability for reversal learning, and weak to no heritability for optimism and discriminative learning, respectively. The two facets of associative learning were weakly negatively correlated, consistent with hypothesized trade-offs underpinning individual cognitive styles. Reversal, but not discriminative learning performance, was associated with judgement bias; less optimistic individuals reversed a previously learnt association faster. Together these results indicate that genetic and environmental contributions differ among traits. While modular models of cognitive abilities predict a lack of common genetic control for different cognitive traits, further investigation is required to fully ascertain the degree of covariation between a broader range of cognitive traits and the extent of any shared genetic control.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  affective state; animal cognition; cognitive judgement bias; cognitive repeatability; heritability; learning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30104430      PMCID: PMC6107570          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  65 in total

1.  An ecologist's guide to the animal model.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Denis Réale; Michelle N Clements; Michael M Morrissey; Erik Postma; Craig A Walling; Loeske E B Kruuk; Daniel H Nussey
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Laboratory estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations in nature.

Authors:  B Riska; T Prout; M Turelli
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Where is the evidence for general intelligence in nonhuman animals?

Authors:  Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  Stereotyping starlings are more 'pessimistic'.

Authors:  Ben O Brilot; Lucy Asher; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Developmental and familial predictors of adult cognitive traits in the European starling.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle; Clare P Andrews; Pat Monaghan; Ben O Brilot; Thomas Bedford; Robert Gillespie; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 6.  How Can We Study the Evolution of Animal Minds?

Authors:  Maxime Cauchoix; Alexis S Chaine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-15

7.  Brain structure evolution in a basal vertebrate clade: evidence from phylogenetic comparative analysis of cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer; Svante Winberg; Niclas Kolm
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Opposite Effects of Early-Life Competition and Developmental Telomere Attrition on Cognitive Biases in Juvenile European Starlings.

Authors:  Melissa Bateson; Michael Emmerson; Gökçe Ergün; Pat Monaghan; Daniel Nettle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Elevated levels of the stress hormone, corticosterone, cause 'pessimistic' judgment bias in broiler chickens.

Authors:  Oluwaseun S Iyasere; Andrew P Beard; Jonathan H Guy; Melissa Bateson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild.

Authors:  Joah R Madden; Ellis J G Langley; Mark A Whiteside; Christine E Beardsworth; Jayden O van Horik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  16 in total

1.  How general is cognitive ability in non-human animals? A meta-analytical and multi-level reanalysis approach.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Poirier; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Julie Morand-Ferron; Vincent Careau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Cauchoix; P K Y Chow; J O van Horik; C M Atance; E J Barbeau; G Barragan-Jason; P Bize; A Boussard; S D Buechel; A Cabirol; L Cauchard; N Claidière; S Dalesman; J M Devaud; M Didic; B Doligez; J Fagot; C Fichtel; J Henke-von der Malsburg; E Hermer; L Huber; F Huebner; P M Kappeler; S Klein; J Langbein; E J G Langley; S E G Lea; M Lihoreau; H Lovlie; L D Matzel; S Nakagawa; C Nawroth; S Oesterwind; B Sauce; E A Smith; E Sorato; S Tebbich; L J Wallis; M A Whiteside; A Wilkinson; A S Chaine; J Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Pair-bonding influences affective state in a monogamous fish species.

Authors:  Chloé Laubu; Philippe Louâpre; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice.

Authors:  Marko Bračić; Lena Bohn; Viktoria Siewert; Vanessa T von Kortzfleisch; Holger Schielzeth; Sylvia Kaiser; Norbert Sachser; S Helene Richter
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.087

5.  Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Joah R Madden; Julie Morand-Ferron; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The impact of environmental interventions among mouse siblings on the heritability and malleability of general cognitive ability.

Authors:  Bruno Sauce; Sophie Bendrath; Margalit Herzfeld; Dan Siegel; Conner Style; Sayeeda Rab; Jonathan Korabelnikov; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Paola Galdi; Lynn K Paul; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Short telomeres drive pessimistic judgement bias in zebrafish.

Authors:  F Espigares; D Abad-Tortosa; S A M Varela; M G Ferreira; R F Oliveira
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Red Junglefowl Chicks Seek Contact With Humans During Foraging Task.

Authors:  Diana Rubene; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-23

10.  The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild.

Authors:  Joah R Madden; Ellis J G Langley; Mark A Whiteside; Christine E Beardsworth; Jayden O van Horik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.