Literature DB >> 30104426

The repeatability of cognitive performance: a meta-analysis.

M Cauchoix1,2, P K Y Chow3,4, J O van Horik3, C M Atance5, E J Barbeau6, G Barragan-Jason2, P Bize7, A Boussard8, S D Buechel8, A Cabirol9, L Cauchard10, N Claidière11, S Dalesman12, J M Devaud9, M Didic13, B Doligez14, J Fagot11, C Fichtel15,16,17, J Henke-von der Malsburg15,16,17, E Hermer16, L Huber17, F Huebner15,16,17, P M Kappeler15,16,17, S Klein9, J Langbein18, E J G Langley3, S E G Lea3, M Lihoreau9, H Lovlie19, L D Matzel20, S Nakagawa21, C Nawroth18, S Oesterwind22, B Sauce20, E A Smith23, E Sorato19, S Tebbich24, L J Wallis25,26, M A Whiteside3, A Wilkinson23, A S Chaine27,2, J Morand-Ferron28.   

Abstract

Behavioural and cognitive processes play important roles in mediating an individual's interactions with its environment. Yet, while there is a vast literature on repeatable individual differences in behaviour, relatively little is known about the repeatability of cognitive performance. To further our understanding of the evolution of cognition, we gathered 44 studies on individual performance of 25 species across six animal classes and used meta-analysis to assess whether cognitive performance is repeatable. We compared repeatability (R) in performance (1) on the same task presented at different times (temporal repeatability), and (2) on different tasks that measured the same putative cognitive ability (contextual repeatability). We also addressed whether R estimates were influenced by seven extrinsic factors (moderators): type of cognitive performance measurement, type of cognitive task, delay between tests, origin of the subjects, experimental context, taxonomic class and publication status. We found support for both temporal and contextual repeatability of cognitive performance, with mean R estimates ranging between 0.15 and 0.28. Repeatability estimates were mostly influenced by the type of cognitive performance measures and publication status. Our findings highlight the widespread occurrence of consistent inter-individual variation in cognition across a range of taxa which, like behaviour, may be associated with fitness outcomes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Causes and consequences of individual differences in cognitive abilities'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  attention; cognitive repeatability; evolutionary biology of cognition; individual differences; learning; memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30104426      PMCID: PMC6107569          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  53 in total

1.  Learning improves growth rate in grasshoppers.

Authors:  R Dukas; E A Bernays
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Brandon Tinklenberg; Josep Call; Amanda M Seed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Survival is linked with reaction time and spatial memory in African striped mice.

Authors:  Audrey Maille; Carsten Schradin
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Evolution of cognition.

Authors:  Jayden van Horik; Nathan J Emery
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-04-11

6.  The advantage of objects over images in discrimination and reversal learning by kea, Nestor notabilis.

Authors:  Mark O'Hara; Ludwig Huber; Gyula Kopanny Gajdon
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  How Can We Study the Evolution of Animal Minds?

Authors:  Maxime Cauchoix; Alexis S Chaine
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-15

8.  A behavioural syndrome, but less evidence for a relationship with cognitive traits in a spatial orientation context.

Authors:  Andrea C Schuster; Uwe Zimmermann; Carina Hauer; Katharina Foerster
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Touch screen assays of behavioural flexibility and error characteristics in Eastern grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis).

Authors:  Pizza Ka Yee Chow; Lisa A Leaver; Ming Wang; Stephen E G Lea
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  A problem with problem solving: motivational traits, but not cognition, predict success on novel operant foraging tasks.

Authors:  Jayden O van Horik; Joah R Madden
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.844

View more
  26 in total

1.  How general is cognitive ability in non-human animals? A meta-analytical and multi-level reanalysis approach.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Poirier; Dovid Y Kozlovsky; Julie Morand-Ferron; Vincent Careau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Brandon Tinklenberg; Josep Call; Amanda M Seed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Lauren M Guillette
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Repeated testing does not confound cognitive performance in the Western Australian magpie (Cracticus tibicen dorsalis).

Authors:  Joseph G Sollis; Benjamin J Ashton; Elizabeth M Speechley; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Measuring and understanding individual differences in cognition.

Authors:  Neeltje J Boogert; Joah R Madden; Julie Morand-Ferron; Alex Thornton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Enrico Sorato; Josefina Zidar; Laura Garnham; Alastair Wilson; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Linking cognition with fitness in a wild primate: fitness correlates of problem-solving performance and spatial learning ability.

Authors:  Franziska Huebner; Claudia Fichtel; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  A distributed brain network predicts general intelligence from resting-state human neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Julien Dubois; Paola Galdi; Lynn K Paul; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Great tits who remember more accurately have difficulty forgetting, but variation is not driven by environmental harshness.

Authors:  Ethan Hermer; Ben Murphy; Alexis S Chaine; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparative cognition in three understudied ungulate species: European bison, forest buffalos and giraffes.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Montserrat Colell; Alvaro Lopez Caicoya; Conrad Ensenyat
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.