Literature DB >> 25452087

The external-internal loop of interference: two types of attention and their influence on the learning abilities of mice.

Bruno Sauce1, Christopher Wass1, Andrew Smith1, Stephanie Kwan1, Louis D Matzel2.   

Abstract

Attention is a component of the working memory system, and is responsible for protecting task-relevant information from interference. Cognitive performance (particularly outside of the laboratory) is often plagued by interference, and the source of this interference, either external or internal, might influence the expression of individual differences in attentional ability. By definition, external attention (also described as "selective attention") protects working memory against sensorial distractors of all kinds, while internal attention (also called "inhibition") protects working memory against emotional impulses, irrelevant information from memory, and automatically-generated responses. At present, it is unclear if these two types of attention are expressed independently in non-human animals, and how they might differentially impact performance on other cognitive processes, such as learning. By using a diverse battery of four attention tests (with varying levels of internal and external sources of interference), here we aimed both to explore this issue, and to obtain a robust and general (less task-specific) measure of attention in mice. Exploratory factor analyses revealed two factors (external and internal attention) that in total, accounted for 73% of the variance in attentional performance. Confirmatory factor analyses found an excellent fit with the data of the model of attention that assumed an external and internal distinction (with a resulting correlation of 0.43). In contrast, a model of attention that assumed one source of variance (i.e., "general attention") exhibited a poor fit with the data. Regarding the relationship between attention and learning, higher resistance against external sources of interference promoted better new learning, but tended to impair performance when cognitive flexibility was required, such as during the reversal of a previously instantiated response. The present results suggest that there can be (at least) two types of attention that contribute to the common variance in attentional performance in mice, and that external and internal attentions might have opposing influences on the rate at which animals learn.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; External attention; Individual differences; Internal attention; Learning; Mice; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25452087      PMCID: PMC5000557          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2014.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  40 in total

1.  The role of perceptual load in negative priming.

Authors:  N Lavie; E Fox
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A meta-analysis of executive components of working memory.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; Joshua W Brown; Mary K Askren; Marc G Berman; Emre Demiralp; Adam Krawitz; John Jonides
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Ignoring irrelevant stimuli in latent inhibition and Stroop paradigms: the effects of schizotypy and gender.

Authors:  Oren Kaplan; Robert E Lubow
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  A gateway system in rostral PFC? Evidence from biasing attention to perceptual information and internal representations.

Authors:  Ilona Henseler; Sebastian Krüger; Peter Dechent; Oliver Gruber
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Attention function and dysfunction in autism.

Authors:  G Allen; E Courchesne
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2001-02-01

7.  A dopaminergic gene cluster in the prefrontal cortex predicts performance indicative of general intelligence in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Stefan Kolata; Kenneth Light; Christopher D Wass; Danielle Colas-Zelin; Debasri Roy; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development.

Authors:  Ryan Lister; Eran A Mukamel; Joseph R Nery; Mark Urich; Clare A Puddifoot; Nicholas D Johnson; Jacinta Lucero; Yun Huang; Andrew J Dwork; Matthew D Schultz; Miao Yu; Julian Tonti-Filippini; Holger Heyn; Shijun Hu; Joseph C Wu; Anjana Rao; Manel Esteller; Chuan He; Fatemeh G Haghighi; Terrence J Sejnowski; M Margarita Behrens; Joseph R Ecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Dopamine D1 sensitivity in the prefrontal cortex predicts general cognitive abilities and is modulated by working memory training.

Authors:  Christopher Wass; Alessandro Pizzo; Bruno Sauce; Yushi Kawasumi; Tudor Sturzoiu; Fred Ree; Tim Otto; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  A shared inhibitory circuit for both exogenous and endogenous control of stimulus selection.

Authors:  Shreesh P Mysore; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  5 in total

1.  Visual Selective Attention in Mice.

Authors:  Lupeng Wang; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Individual differences: Case studies of rodent and primate intelligence.

Authors:  Louis D Matzel; Bruno Sauce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  The impact of environmental interventions among mouse siblings on the heritability and malleability of general cognitive ability.

Authors:  Bruno Sauce; Sophie Bendrath; Margalit Herzfeld; Dan Siegel; Conner Style; Sayeeda Rab; Jonathan Korabelnikov; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Salience of Somatosensory Stimulus Modulating External-to-Internal Orienting Attention.

Authors:  Jiaxin Peng; Sam C C Chan; Bolton K H Chau; Qiuhua Yu; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Individual differences in proactive interference in rats (Rattus Norvegicus).

Authors:  Elias Tsakanikos; Phil Reed
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.