| Literature DB >> 30103784 |
Yazhou He1,2,3, Maria Timofeeva1, Susan M Farrington1, Peter Vaughan-Shaw1, Victoria Svinti1, Marion Walker1, Lina Zgaga1,4, Xiangrui Meng3, Xue Li3, Athina Spiliopoulou3, Xia Jiang5,6, Elina Hyppönen7,8, Peter Kraft5, Douglas P Kiel9,10,11, Caroline Hayward12, Archie Campbell13, David Porteous13, Katarina Vucic14, Iva Kirac15, Masa Filipovic16, Sarah E Harris17,18, Ian J Deary17,19, Richard Houlston20, Ian P Tomlinson21, Harry Campbell1,3, Evropi Theodoratou22,23, Malcolm G Dunlop24.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whilst observational studies establish that lower plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) levels are associated with higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), establishing causality has proven challenging. Since vitamin D is modifiable, these observations have substantial clinical and public health implications. Indeed, many health agencies already recommend supplemental vitamin D. Here, we explore causality in a large Mendelian randomisation (MR) study using an improved genetic instrument for circulating 25-OHD.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Mendelian randomisation; Vitamin D
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30103784 PMCID: PMC6090711 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1119-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Fig. 1a Conceptional framework of Mendelian randomisation (MR). The instrumental variable is based on genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms from independent studies of the association between the exposure of interest (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations) and the outcome (colorectal cancer (CRC)). The effect of an instrumental variable should be independent from the confounding factors and should affect CRC risk only through exposure. In the presence of a causal relationship, the association between instrumental variable and CRC would be expected to be proportionate to its association with the serum 25-OHD concentrations, given the relationship between the serum 25-OHD concentrations and CRC risk. Figure adapted from Timpson et al. [65]. b Basic design of our MR on the causal effect of 25-OHD on CRC risk. The blue text of outer contour showed individual level MR analysis. β1 is the regression coefficient of instrumental variable (IV) on exposure (25-OHD level) using controls from the Scotland Colorectal Cancer Study (SOCCS); β2 is the regression coefficient of IV on outcome (CRC) using SOCCS series, Croatia and UK biobank case control studies. Causal effect is estimated by the ratio of β2 and β1. The red text of inner contour showed summary statistics MR analysis. Effect sizes of IVs on 25-OHD and CRC are extracted from two GWAS meta-analyses and causal estimate is derived from an inverse variance-weighted MR analysis
Two-stage regression coefficients for Mendelian randomisation analysis using genetic risk score in individual level data
| GRS-25OHD coefficient (95% CI)b | GRS-CRC coefficient (95% CI)c | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOCCS controls | Scotland 1 | SOCCS/GS | Croatia | SOCCS/LBC | UK biobank | |
| Univariable model | ||||||
| Weighted score | 0.055 (0.039 to 0.071) | 0.036 (−0.055 to 0.128) | − 0.009 (− 0.045 to 0.026) | 0.072 (− 0.048 to 0.191) | − 0.029 (− 0.133 to 0.076) | − 0.022 (− 0.061 to 0.017) |
| Unweighted score | 0.046 (0.031 to 0.062) | 0.037 (−0.055 to 0.128) | − 0.005 (− 0.041 to 0.030) | 0.110 (− 0.010 to 0.230) | 0.001 (− 0.104 to 0.106) | − 0.008 (− 0.047 to 0.031) |
| Multivariable modela | ||||||
| Weighted score | 0.057 (0.040 to 0.073) | 0.109 (−0.011 to 0.230) | − 0.026 (− 0.081 to 0.029) | 0.074 (− 0.047 to 0.194) | − 0.031 (− 0.136 to 0.074) | − 0.024 (− 0.047 to 0.031) |
| Unweighted score | 0.051 (0035 to 0.068) | 0.080 (−0.038 to 0.197) | − 0.022 (− 0.077 to 0.032) | 0.114 (− 0.007 to 0.235) | − 0.003 (− 0.108 to 0.102) | − 0.011 (− 0.050 to 0.029) |
aMultivariable regression model adjusted by age, sex and BMI for Scotland 1, SOCCS/GS and UK biobank, age and sex for Croatia, sex for LBC.MD
bChange in log-transformed 25-OHD (nmol/L) per unit increase in GRS
cChange in logit CRC risk per unit increase in GRS
25-OHD 25-hydroxyvitamin D, CI confidence interval, CRC colorectal cancer, GRS genetic risk score, LBC Lothian Birth Cohort, SOCCS Scotland Colorectal Cancer Study
Main results of Mendelian randomisation analysis using individual level data
| Cases/controls | Causal estimate (odds ratio)b (95% CI) | Overall estimatec |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotland 1 | SOCCS/GS | Croatia | SOCCS/LBC | UK biobank | ||||
| 932/942 | 4551/8804 | 689/441 | 461/1444 | 3301/11382 | ||||
| Univariable model | ||||||||
| Weighted score | 1.92 (0.36–10.27) | 0.84 (0.44–1.62) | 3.69 (0.41–33.34) | 0.59 (0.09–3.99) | 0.67 (0.33–1.38) | 0.85 (0.55–1.33) | 0.481 | 0.531 |
| Unweighted score | 2.20 (0.30–16.19) | 0.89 (0.41–1.93) | 10.71 (0.71–161.41) | 1.02 (0.11–9.84) | 0.85 (0.36–1.96) | 1.03 (0.61–1.73) | 0.920 | 0.440 |
| Multivariable modela | ||||||||
| Weighted score | 6.85 (0.77–60.81) | 0.63 (0.24–1.67) | 3.82 (0.41–35.23) | 0.57 (0.08–3.87) | 0.87 (0.44–1.73) | 1.03 (0.51–2.07) | 0.931 | 0.227 |
| Unweighted score | 4.70 (0.46–48.41) | 0.65 (0.22–1.88) | 11.21 (0.76–164.33) | 0.93 (0.10–8.66) | 0.81 (0.38–1.75) | 1.12 (0.51–2.45) | 0.785 | 0.222 |
aMultivariable regression model adjusted by age, sex and BMI for Scotland 1, SOCCS/GS and UK biobank, age and sex for Croatia, sex for LBC.MD
bChange in CRC risk per unit log-transformed 25-OHD (nmol/L)
cOverall estimates were obtained by meta-analyses under random-effect model
dPhet, P values of χ2 Q test for heterogeneity
25-OHD 25-hydroxyvitamin D, CI confidence interval, CRC colorectal cancer, GRS genetic risk score, LBC Lothian Birth Cohort, SOCCS Scotland Colorectal Cancer Study
Fig. 2Association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) affecting genetic variants with log transformed 25-OHD concentration and colorectal cancer risk. The slope of the red line is the causal estimate derived from inverse variance-weighted (IVW) Mendelian randomisation and slope of the blue dash line represents the 95% confidence interval of IVW estimate
Summary of genetic variants used as instrumental variables in summary statistics approach
| ID | Gene | Effect allele | Chromosome | Beta (25-OHD) | Se (25-OHD) | Beta (CRC) | Se (CRC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs10741657 | CYP2R1 | A | 11 | 0.0312 | 0.0022 | 0.0162 | 0.0135 |
| rs10745742 | AMDHD1 | T | 12 | 0.0167 | 0.0022 | −0.0049 | 0.0138 |
| rs12785878 | NADSYN1/ DHCR7 | T | 11 | 0.0361 | 0.0022 | −0.0097 | 0.016 |
| rs17216707 | CYP24A1 | T | 20 | 0.0262 | 0.0027 | 0.0138 | 0.0173 |
| rs3755967 | GC | C | 4 | 0.0893 | 0.0023 | −0.0154 | 0.0148 |
| rs8018720 | SEC23A | G | 14 | 0.0164 | 0.0029 | −0.0163 | 0.0176 |
Beta regression coefficients of GWAS meta-analysis, se standard error, CRC colorectal cancer
Main results of Mendelian randomisation analysis in 18,967 colorectal cancer cases and 48,168 controls using summary statistic approach
| Methods | Causal estimates (95% CI)a |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | 0.91 (0.69–1.19) | 0.475 | NA |
| Robust IVW | 0.90 (0.74–1.09) | 0.318 | NA |
| Penalised IVW | 0.91 (0.69–1.19) | 0.475 | NA |
| MR-Egger | 0.83 (0.51–1.34) | 0.452 | 0.657 |
| Robust MR-Egger | 0.83 (0.67–1.03) | 0.09 | 0.61 |
| Penalised MR-Egger | 0.83 (0.51–1.34) | 0.452 | 0.657 |
| Simple median | 0.80 (0.49–1.30) | 0.375 | NA |
| Weighted median | 0.84 (0.62–1.15) | 0.278 | NA |
| Penalised weighted median | 0.84 (0.62–1.15) | 0.278 | NA |
aChange in colorectal cancer risk per unit log-transformed 25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L)
CI confidence interval, IVW inverse variance weighted, MR Mendelian randomisation, NA not available, P P value of Egger regression test on the intercept