BACKGROUND: Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies assess the causality of an exposure-disease association using genetic determinants [i.e. instrumental variables (IVs)] of the exposure. Power and IV strength requirements for MR studies using multiple genetic variants have not been explored. METHODS: We simulated cohort data sets consisting of a normally distributed disease trait, a normally distributed exposure, which affects this trait and a biallelic genetic variant that affects the exposure. We estimated power to detect an effect of exposure on disease for varying allele frequencies, effect sizes and samples sizes (using two-stage least squares regression on 10,000 data sets-Stage 1 is a regression of exposure on the variant. Stage 2 is a regression of disease on the fitted exposure). Similar analyses were conducted using multiple genetic variants (5, 10, 20) as independent or combined IVs. We assessed IV strength using the first-stage F statistic. RESULTS: Simulations of realistic scenarios indicate that MR studies will require large (n > 1000), often very large (n > 10,000), sample sizes. In many cases, so-called 'weak IV' problems arise when using multiple variants as independent IVs (even with as few as five), resulting in biased effect estimates. Combining genetic factors into fewer IVs results in modest power decreases, but alleviates weak IV problems. Ideal methods for combining genetic factors depend upon knowledge of the genetic architecture underlying the exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of well-powered, unbiased MR studies will depend upon the amount of variance in the exposure that can be explained by known genetic factors and the 'strength' of the IV set derived from these genetic factors.
BACKGROUND: Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies assess the causality of an exposure-disease association using genetic determinants [i.e. instrumental variables (IVs)] of the exposure. Power and IV strength requirements for MR studies using multiple genetic variants have not been explored. METHODS: We simulated cohort data sets consisting of a normally distributed disease trait, a normally distributed exposure, which affects this trait and a biallelic genetic variant that affects the exposure. We estimated power to detect an effect of exposure on disease for varying allele frequencies, effect sizes and samples sizes (using two-stage least squares regression on 10,000 data sets-Stage 1 is a regression of exposure on the variant. Stage 2 is a regression of disease on the fitted exposure). Similar analyses were conducted using multiple genetic variants (5, 10, 20) as independent or combined IVs. We assessed IV strength using the first-stage F statistic. RESULTS: Simulations of realistic scenarios indicate that MR studies will require large (n > 1000), often very large (n > 10,000), sample sizes. In many cases, so-called 'weak IV' problems arise when using multiple variants as independent IVs (even with as few as five), resulting in biased effect estimates. Combining genetic factors into fewer IVs results in modest power decreases, but alleviates weak IV problems. Ideal methods for combining genetic factors depend upon knowledge of the genetic architecture underlying the exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of well-powered, unbiased MR studies will depend upon the amount of variance in the exposure that can be explained by known genetic factors and the 'strength' of the IV set derived from these genetic factors.
Authors: Aditi Hazra; Peter Kraft; Jacob Selhub; Edward L Giovannucci; Gilles Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-09-07 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Xin Yuan; Dawn Waterworth; John R B Perry; Noha Lim; Kijoung Song; John C Chambers; Weihua Zhang; Peter Vollenweider; Heide Stirnadel; Toby Johnson; Sven Bergmann; Noam D Beckmann; Yun Li; Luigi Ferrucci; David Melzer; Dena Hernandez; Andrew Singleton; James Scott; Paul Elliott; Gerard Waeber; Lon Cardon; Timothy M Frayling; Jaspal S Kooner; Vincent Mooser Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Eric J Brunner; Mika Kivimäki; Daniel R Witte; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith; Jackie A Cooper; Michelle Miller; Gordon D O Lowe; Ann Rumley; Juan P Casas; Tina Shah; Steve E Humphries; Aroon D Hingorani; Michael G Marmot; Nicholas J Timpson; Meena Kumari Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-08-12 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: David Melzer; John R B Perry; Dena Hernandez; Anna-Maria Corsi; Kara Stevens; Ian Rafferty; Fulvio Lauretani; Anna Murray; J Raphael Gibbs; Giuseppe Paolisso; Sajjad Rafiq; Javier Simon-Sanchez; Hana Lango; Sonja Scholz; Michael N Weedon; Sampath Arepalli; Neil Rice; Nicole Washecka; Alison Hurst; Angela Britton; William Henley; Joyce van de Leemput; Rongling Li; Anne B Newman; Greg Tranah; Tamara Harris; Vijay Panicker; Colin Dayan; Amanda Bennett; Mark I McCarthy; Aimo Ruokonen; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Jack Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew Singleton; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Wei-Min Chen; Michael R Erdos; Anne U Jackson; Richa Saxena; Serena Sanna; Kristi D Silver; Nicholas J Timpson; Torben Hansen; Marco Orrù; Maria Grazia Piras; Lori L Bonnycastle; Cristen J Willer; Valeriya Lyssenko; Haiqing Shen; Johanna Kuusisto; Shah Ebrahim; Natascia Sestu; William L Duren; Maria Cristina Spada; Heather M Stringham; Laura J Scott; Nazario Olla; Amy J Swift; Samer Najjar; Braxton D Mitchell; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Gitte Andersen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Torben Jørgensen; Jouko Saramies; Timo T Valle; Thomas A Buchanan; Alan R Shuldiner; Edward Lakatta; Richard N Bergman; Manuela Uda; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Oluf Pedersen; Antonio Cao; Leif Groop; Karen L Mohlke; Markku Laakso; David Schlessinger; Francis S Collins; David Altshuler; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Michael Boehnke; Angelo Scuteri; Richard M Watanabe Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M Islam; T H Jafar; A R Wood; N M G De Silva; M Caulfield; N Chaturvedi; T M Frayling Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-04-28 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: L L N Husemoen; T Skaaby; T Martinussen; T Jørgensen; B H Thuesen; C Kistorp; J Jeppesen; J P Thyssen; M Meldgaard; P B Szecsi; M Fenger; A Linneberg Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Sarah J Lewis; Ali Murad; Lina Chen; George Davey Smith; Jenny Donovan; Tom Palmer; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; J Athene Lane; Michael Davis; Angela Cox; Richard M Martin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 3.240