Literature DB >> 20813862

Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants.

Brandon L Pierce1, Habibul Ahsan, Tyler J Vanderweele.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mendelian Randomization (MR) studies assess the causality of an exposure-disease association using genetic determinants [i.e. instrumental variables (IVs)] of the exposure. Power and IV strength requirements for MR studies using multiple genetic variants have not been explored.
METHODS: We simulated cohort data sets consisting of a normally distributed disease trait, a normally distributed exposure, which affects this trait and a biallelic genetic variant that affects the exposure. We estimated power to detect an effect of exposure on disease for varying allele frequencies, effect sizes and samples sizes (using two-stage least squares regression on 10,000 data sets-Stage 1 is a regression of exposure on the variant. Stage 2 is a regression of disease on the fitted exposure). Similar analyses were conducted using multiple genetic variants (5, 10, 20) as independent or combined IVs. We assessed IV strength using the first-stage F statistic.
RESULTS: Simulations of realistic scenarios indicate that MR studies will require large (n > 1000), often very large (n > 10,000), sample sizes. In many cases, so-called 'weak IV' problems arise when using multiple variants as independent IVs (even with as few as five), resulting in biased effect estimates. Combining genetic factors into fewer IVs results in modest power decreases, but alleviates weak IV problems. Ideal methods for combining genetic factors depend upon knowledge of the genetic architecture underlying the exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of well-powered, unbiased MR studies will depend upon the amount of variance in the exposure that can be explained by known genetic factors and the 'strength' of the IV set derived from these genetic factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20813862      PMCID: PMC3147064          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyq151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  46 in total

1.  Estimation based on case-control designs with known prevalence probability.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  'Mendelian randomization' equals instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments.

Authors:  George L Wehby; Robert L Ohsfeldt; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Accounting for ancestry: population substructure and genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Chao Tian; Peter K Gregersen; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.

Authors:  Tom M Palmer; John R Thompson; Martin D Tobin; Nuala A Sheehan; Paul R Burton
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  Revealing the architecture of gene regulation: the promise of eQTL studies.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Scott A Rifkin; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Common variants of FUT2 are associated with plasma vitamin B12 levels.

Authors:  Aditi Hazra; Peter Kraft; Jacob Selhub; Edward L Giovannucci; Gilles Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Population-based genome-wide association studies reveal six loci influencing plasma levels of liver enzymes.

Authors:  Xin Yuan; Dawn Waterworth; John R B Perry; Noha Lim; Kijoung Song; John C Chambers; Weihua Zhang; Peter Vollenweider; Heide Stirnadel; Toby Johnson; Sven Bergmann; Noam D Beckmann; Yun Li; Luigi Ferrucci; David Melzer; Dena Hernandez; Andrew Singleton; James Scott; Paul Elliott; Gerard Waeber; Lon Cardon; Timothy M Frayling; Jaspal S Kooner; Vincent Mooser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Inflammation, insulin resistance, and diabetes--Mendelian randomization using CRP haplotypes points upstream.

Authors:  Eric J Brunner; Mika Kivimäki; Daniel R Witte; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith; Jackie A Cooper; Michelle Miller; Gordon D O Lowe; Ann Rumley; Juan P Casas; Tina Shah; Steve E Humphries; Aroon D Hingorani; Michael G Marmot; Nicholas J Timpson; Meena Kumari
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  A genome-wide association study identifies protein quantitative trait loci (pQTLs).

Authors:  David Melzer; John R B Perry; Dena Hernandez; Anna-Maria Corsi; Kara Stevens; Ian Rafferty; Fulvio Lauretani; Anna Murray; J Raphael Gibbs; Giuseppe Paolisso; Sajjad Rafiq; Javier Simon-Sanchez; Hana Lango; Sonja Scholz; Michael N Weedon; Sampath Arepalli; Neil Rice; Nicole Washecka; Alison Hurst; Angela Britton; William Henley; Joyce van de Leemput; Rongling Li; Anne B Newman; Greg Tranah; Tamara Harris; Vijay Panicker; Colin Dayan; Amanda Bennett; Mark I McCarthy; Aimo Ruokonen; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Jack Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew Singleton; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Variations in the G6PC2/ABCB11 genomic region are associated with fasting glucose levels.

Authors:  Wei-Min Chen; Michael R Erdos; Anne U Jackson; Richa Saxena; Serena Sanna; Kristi D Silver; Nicholas J Timpson; Torben Hansen; Marco Orrù; Maria Grazia Piras; Lori L Bonnycastle; Cristen J Willer; Valeriya Lyssenko; Haiqing Shen; Johanna Kuusisto; Shah Ebrahim; Natascia Sestu; William L Duren; Maria Cristina Spada; Heather M Stringham; Laura J Scott; Nazario Olla; Amy J Swift; Samer Najjar; Braxton D Mitchell; Debbie A Lawlor; George Davey Smith; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Gitte Andersen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Torben Jørgensen; Jouko Saramies; Timo T Valle; Thomas A Buchanan; Alan R Shuldiner; Edward Lakatta; Richard N Bergman; Manuela Uda; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Oluf Pedersen; Antonio Cao; Leif Groop; Karen L Mohlke; Markku Laakso; David Schlessinger; Francis S Collins; David Altshuler; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Michael Boehnke; Angelo Scuteri; Richard M Watanabe
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  190 in total

1.  Multiple genetic variants explain measurable variance in type 2 diabetes-related traits in Pakistanis.

Authors:  M Islam; T H Jafar; A R Wood; N M G De Silva; M Caulfield; N Chaturvedi; T M Frayling
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Methodological challenges in mendelian randomization.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Marilyn Cornelis; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Association of Myopia and Intraocular Pressure With Retinal Detachment in European Descent Participants of the UK Biobank Cohort: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Xikun Han; Jue-Sheng Ong; Jiyuan An; Jamie E Craig; Puya Gharahkhani; Alex W Hewitt; Stuart MacGregor
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Mendelian randomization: loosening the Gordian knot of testosterone and male ageing.

Authors:  David J Handelsman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Investigating the causal effect of vitamin D on serum adiponectin using a Mendelian randomization approach.

Authors:  L L N Husemoen; T Skaaby; T Martinussen; T Jørgensen; B H Thuesen; C Kistorp; J Jeppesen; J P Thyssen; M Meldgaard; P B Szecsi; M Fenger; A Linneberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies.

Authors:  Marie-Jo A Brion; Konstantin Shakhbazov; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.

Authors:  Camelia C Minică; Conor V Dolan; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco de Geus; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Genetics: Genetic risk scores--new promises for drug evaluation.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Stella Trompet
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 32.419

9.  Mendelian randomization analysis associates increased serum urate, due to genetic variation in uric acid transporters, with improved renal function.

Authors:  Kim Hughes; Tanya Flynn; Janak de Zoysa; Nicola Dalbeth; Tony R Merriman
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Associations between an obesity related genetic variant (FTO rs9939609) and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Sarah J Lewis; Ali Murad; Lina Chen; George Davey Smith; Jenny Donovan; Tom Palmer; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; J Athene Lane; Michael Davis; Angela Cox; Richard M Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.