Literature DB >> 24159078

Calculating statistical power in Mendelian randomization studies.

Marie-Jo A Brion1, Konstantin Shakhbazov, Peter M Visscher.   

Abstract

In Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, where genetic variants are used as proxy measures for an exposure trait of interest, obtaining adequate statistical power is frequently a concern due to the small amount of variation in a phenotypic trait that is typically explained by genetic variants. A range of power estimates based on simulations and specific parameters for two-stage least squares (2SLS) MR analyses based on continuous variables has previously been published. However there are presently no specific equations or software tools one can implement for calculating power of a given MR study. Using asymptotic theory, we show that in the case of continuous variables and a single instrument, for example a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) or multiple SNP predictor, statistical power for a fixed sample size is a function of two parameters: the proportion of variation in the exposure variable explained by the genetic predictor and the true causal association between the exposure and outcome variable. We demonstrate that power for 2SLS MR can be derived using the non-centrality parameter (NCP) of the statistical test that is employed to test whether the 2SLS regression coefficient is zero. We show that the previously published power estimates from simulations can be represented theoretically using this NCP-based approach, with similar estimates observed when the simulation-based estimates are compared with our NCP-based approach. General equations for calculating statistical power for 2SLS MR using the NCP are provided in this note, and we implement the calculations in a web-based application.

Keywords:  Mendelian randomization; Power; instrumental variable; non-centrality parameter

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24159078      PMCID: PMC3807619          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  5 in total

1.  'Mendelian randomization': can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease?

Authors:  George Davey Smith; Shah Ebrahim
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Five years of GWAS discovery.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Matthew A Brown; Mark I McCarthy; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants.

Authors:  Brandon L Pierce; Habibul Ahsan; Tyler J Vanderweele
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Mendelian randomization: the use of genes in instrumental variable analyses.

Authors:  Stephanie von Hinke Kessler Scholder; George Davey Smith; Debbie A Lawlor; Carol Propper; Frank Windmeijer
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Mendelian randomization: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology.

Authors:  Debbie A Lawlor; Roger M Harbord; Jonathan A C Sterne; Nic Timpson; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

  5 in total
  329 in total

1.  Extending Causality Tests with Genetic Instruments: An Integration of Mendelian Randomization with the Classical Twin Design.

Authors:  Camelia C Minică; Conor V Dolan; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco de Geus; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Genomics and metabolomics of muscular mass in a community-based sample of UK females.

Authors:  Michael Korostishevsky; Claire J Steves; Ida Malkin; Timothy Spector; Frances M K Williams; Gregory Livshits
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Educational attainment protects against type 2 diabetes independently of cognitive performance: a Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Jialin Liang; Huan Cai; Ganxiong Liang; Zhonghua Liu; Liang Fang; Baile Zhu; Baoying Liu; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  No clear support for a role for vitamin D in Parkinson's disease: A Mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Susanna C Larsson; Andrew B Singleton; Mike A Nalls; J Brent Richards
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 10.338

5.  Causal Associations of Adiposity and Body Fat Distribution With Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke Subtypes, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Authors:  Caroline E Dale; Ghazaleh Fatemifar; Tom M Palmer; Jon White; David Prieto-Merino; Delilah Zabaneh; Jorgen E L Engmann; Tina Shah; Andrew Wong; Helen R Warren; Stela McLachlan; Stella Trompet; Max Moldovan; Richard W Morris; Reecha Sofat; Meena Kumari; Elina Hyppönen; Barbara J Jefferis; Tom R Gaunt; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Ang Zhou; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Renée de Mutsert; Raymond Noordam; Mark J Caulfield; J Wouter Jukema; Bradford B Worrall; Patricia B Munroe; Usha Menon; Chris Power; Diana Kuh; Debbie A Lawlor; Steve E Humphries; Dennis O Mook-Kanamori; Naveed Sattar; Mika Kivimaki; Jacqueline F Price; George Davey Smith; Frank Dudbridge; Aroon D Hingorani; Michael V Holmes; Juan P Casas
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Molecular genetic approaches to understanding the comorbidity of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Ian R Gizer
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2016-11

7.  Systolic Blood Pressure and Risk of Valvular Heart Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Milad Nazarzadeh; Ana-Catarina Pinho-Gomes; Karl Smith Byrne; Dexter Canoy; Francesca Raimondi; Jose Roberto Ayala Solares; Catherine M Otto; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Integration of summary data from GWAS and eQTL studies predicts complex trait gene targets.

Authors:  Zhihong Zhu; Futao Zhang; Han Hu; Andrew Bakshi; Matthew R Robinson; Joseph E Powell; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Naomi R Wray; Peter M Visscher; Jian Yang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data.

Authors:  Peggy Sekula; Fabiola Del Greco M; Cristian Pattaro; Anna Köttgen
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Reassessing the Association between Circulating Vitamin D and IGFBP-3: Observational and Mendelian Randomization Estimates from Independent Sources.

Authors:  Vanessa Y Tan; Kalina M Biernacka; Tom Dudding; Carolina Bonilla; Rebecca Gilbert; Robert C Kaplan; Qi Qibin; Alexander Teumer; Richard M Martin; Claire M Perks; Nicholas J Timpson; Jeff M P Holly
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.