Literature DB >> 30083279

Optimizing Design With Extensive Simulation Data: A Case Study of Designing a Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Tool.

Chi-Lun Lin1, Dane Coffey2, Daniel Keefe3, Arthur Erdman4.   

Abstract

Design by Dragging (DBD) [1] is a virtual design tool, which displays three-dimensional (3D) visualizations of many simulation results obtained by sampling a large design space and ties this visual display together with a new user interface. The design space is explored through mouse-based interactions performed directly on top of the 3D data visualizations. Our previous study [1] introduced the realization of DBD with a simplistic example of biopsy needle design under a static bending force. This paper considers a realistic problem of designing a vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) needle that brings in more technical challenges to include dynamic tissue reaction forces, nonlinear tissue deformation, and progressive tissue damage in an integrated visualization with design suggestions. The emphasis is placed on the inverse design strategy in DBD, which involves clicking directly on a stress (or other output field parameter) contour and dragging it to a new (usually preferable) position on the contour. Subsequently, the software computes the best fit for the design variables for generating a new output stress field based on the user input. Three cases demonstrated how the inverse design can assist users in intuitively and interactively approaching desired design solutions. This paper illustrates how virtual prototyping may be used to replace (or reduce reliance on) purely experimental trial-and-error methods for achieving optimal designs.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30083279      PMCID: PMC6056196          DOI: 10.1115/1.4040043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Device        ISSN: 1932-6181            Impact factor:   0.582


  14 in total

1.  Stereotactic core biopsy: Comparison of 11 gauge with 8 gauge vacuum assisted breast biopsy.

Authors:  Shambhavi Venkataraman; Vandana Dialani; Hannah L Gilmore; Tejas S Mehta
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art.

Authors:  E A M O'Flynn; A R M Wilson; M J Michell
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  A method to measure the hyperelastic parameters of ex vivo breast tissue samples.

Authors:  Abbas Samani; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.

Authors:  Christine Tanner; Julia A Schnabel; Derek L G Hill; David J Hawkes; Martin O Leach; D Rodney Hose
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast.

Authors:  A Pérez del Palomar; B Calvo; J Herrero; J López; M Doblaré
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Mammotome versus ATEC: a comparison of two breast vacuum biopsy techniques under sonographic guidance.

Authors:  Markus Hahn; Karl Oliver Kagan; Katja Claudia Siegmann; Ute Krainick-Strobel; Bernhard Kraemer; Tanja Fehm; Eva Fischbach; Diethelm Wallwiener; Ines Gruber
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Slicing softly with shear.

Authors:  E Reyssat; T Tallinen; M Le Merrer; L Mahadevan
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 8.  Modeling breast biomechanics for multi-modal image analysis--successes and challenges.

Authors:  Vijay Rajagopal; Poul M F Nielsen; Martyn P Nash
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun

9.  Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ian Grady; Heidi Gorsuch; Shelly Wilburn-Bailey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Study of the effect of cannula rotation on tissue cutting for needle biopsy.

Authors:  Peidong Han; Kornel Ehmann
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.