Literature DB >> 15978438

Ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia.

Ian Grady1, Heidi Gorsuch, Shelly Wilburn-Bailey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In October 2002, ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision was shown to facilitate the complete removal of benign breast lesions up to 3 cm in diameter. This study was performed to ascertain the overall accuracy of ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision as evidenced by the frequency of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) underestimation. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review was conducted of 542 consecutive ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsies performed between February 2000 and September 2004. Before July 2002, no attempt was made to completely remove all imaged lesion evidence. After July 2002, all patients underwent complete percutaneous excision of all imaged lesion evidence. Pathology review revealed 52 lesions that demonstrated ADH and no evidence of malignancy. Each patient with this diagnosis was offered surgical excision. Pathologic reports for each group were compared with the subsequent open surgical specimens.
RESULTS: Of 542 consecutively diagnosed lesions, 52 displayed ADH with no evidence of malignancy (10%). Five patients refused operation. Of the 47 patients who underwent open excision, 6 (13%) were found to have malignancies. The rate of ADH underestimation was 6 of 18 (33%) in incisional biopsies and 0 of 29 performed with complete imaged lesion evidence (p=0.002). The rate of ADH underestimation in women who underwent ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision was zero, a result equivalent to open surgical biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: ADH is a more common finding in sonographic lesions than has been previously reported. Complete ultrasound-guided, vacuum-assisted, percutaneous excision is more accurate than nonexcisional ultrasound-guided biopsy. Patients so diagnosed have very low underestimation rates and may not require open surgical reexcision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15978438     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  23 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of ultrasound-guided, large-core needle breast biopsy.

Authors:  G Schueller; C Schueller-Weidekamm; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Automated algorithm for breast tissue differentiation in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mircea Mujat; R Daniel Ferguson; Daniel X Hammer; Christopher Gittins; Nicusor Iftimia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Low coherence interferometry approach for aiding fine needle aspiration biopsies.

Authors:  Ernest W Chang; Joseph Gardecki; Martha Pitman; Eric J Wilsterman; Ankit Patel; Guillermo J Tearney; Nicusor Iftimia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Optimizing Design With Extensive Simulation Data: A Case Study of Designing a Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Tool.

Authors:  Chi-Lun Lin; Dane Coffey; Daniel Keefe; Arthur Erdman
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 0.582

5.  Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Use at the European Institute of Oncology in 2010.

Authors:  F Abbate; E Cassano; S Menna; G Viale
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2011-10-21

Review 6.  Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Lin Park; Jisun Hong
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-05

Review 7.  Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Satoko Nakano; Yoshimi Imawari; Akemi Mibu; Masahiko Otsuka; Toshinori Oinuma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  The current role of vacuum assisted breast biopsy system in breast disease.

Authors:  Hai-Lin Park; Lee Su Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  Vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy for isolated BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications: evaluation with histopathology and midterm follow-up results.

Authors:  Mehmet Mahir Atasoy; Nuri Tasali; Rahmi Çubuk; Burcu Narin; Uğur Deveci; Neşe Yener; Levent Çelik
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.630

10.  Effectiveness of the diagnostic pathway of BLES: could it be safely used as a therapeutic method in selected benign lesions?

Authors:  Tuğba İlkem Kurtoğlu Özçağlayan; Sibel Özkan Gürdal; Meltem Öznur; Ömer Özçağlayan; Mücahit Doğru; Birol Topçu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.