Literature DB >> 19404655

Mammotome versus ATEC: a comparison of two breast vacuum biopsy techniques under sonographic guidance.

Markus Hahn1, Karl Oliver Kagan, Katja Claudia Siegmann, Ute Krainick-Strobel, Bernhard Kraemer, Tanja Fehm, Eva Fischbach, Diethelm Wallwiener, Ines Gruber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study evaluates the differences between the Mammotome (MT) and ATEC (A) vacuum biopsy (VB) of the breast in terms of diagnostic reliability, biopsy duration and complications.
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, 62 ultrasound-guided VBs of the breast were performed. MT and A were compared using Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: The mean lesion size and the BI-RADS distribution were equal in both groups. Representative tissue was extracted in all 62 biopsies; thus no repeat biopsies were necessary. A sonographically guided complete excision was possible in 46 cases. More imaging-guided complete excisions were achieved with the MT than with A (87 vs. 63%). Technical complications occurred twice with A and once with MT. No medical complications occurred in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: Both systems are suitable for the diagnostic clarification of unclear breast lesions as well as complete excision of benign lesions under sonographic imaging. Sonographically guided complete resection was achieved more often with the MT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404655     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1101-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  2 in total

1.  Optimizing Design With Extensive Simulation Data: A Case Study of Designing a Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Tool.

Authors:  Chi-Lun Lin; Dane Coffey; Daniel Keefe; Arthur Erdman
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 0.582

2.  Ultrasound-guided diagnostic breast biopsy methodology: retrospective comparison of the 8-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy approach versus the spring-loaded 14-gauge core biopsy approach.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.754

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.