Literature DB >> 16872083

Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models.

Christine Tanner1, Julia A Schnabel, Derek L G Hill, David J Hawkes, Martin O Leach, D Rodney Hose.   

Abstract

Recently it has been suggested that finite element methods could be used to predict breast deformations in a number of applications, including comparison of multimodality images, validation of image registration and image guided interventions. Unfortunately knowledge of the mechanical properties of breast tissues is limited. This study evaluated the accuracy with which biomechanical breast models based on finite element methods can predict the displacements of tissue within the breast in the practical clinical situation where the boundaries of the organ might be known reasonably accurately but there is some uncertainty on the mechanical properties of the tissue. For two datasets, we investigate the influence of tissue elasticity values, Poisson's ratios, boundary conditions, finite element solvers and mesh resolutions. Magnetic resonance images were acquired before and after compressing each volunteer's breast by about 20%. Surface displacement boundary conditions were derived from a three-dimensional nonrigid image registration. Six linear and three nonlinear elastic material models with and without skin were tested. These were compared to hyperelastic models. The accuracy of the models was evaluated by assessing the ability of the model to predict the location of 12 corresponding anatomical landmarks. The accuracy was most sensitive to the Poisson's ratio and the boundary condition. Best results were achieved for accurate boundary conditions, appropriate Poisson's ratios and models where fibroglandular tissue was at most four times stiffer than fatty tissue. These configurations reduced the mean (maximum) distance of the landmarks from 6.6 mm (12.4 mm) to 2.1 mm (3.4 mm) averaged over all experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16872083     DOI: 10.1118/1.2198315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  21 in total

1.  An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.

Authors:  Christina M L Hsu; Mark L Palmeri; W Paul Segars; Alexander I Veress; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Population of 224 realistic human subject-based computational breast phantoms.

Authors:  David W Erickson; Jered R Wells; Gregory M Sturgeon; Ehsan Samei; James T Dobbins; W Paul Segars; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Methodology based on genetic heuristics for in-vivo characterizing the patient-specific biomechanical behavior of the breast tissues.

Authors:  M A Lago; M J Rúperez; F Martínez-Martínez; S Martínez-Sanchis; P R Bakic; C Monserrat
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 6.954

4.  Optimizing Design With Extensive Simulation Data: A Case Study of Designing a Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy Tool.

Authors:  Chi-Lun Lin; Dane Coffey; Daniel Keefe; Arthur Erdman
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 0.582

5.  Toward efficient biomechanical-based deformable image registration of lungs for image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Adil Al-Mayah; Joanne Moseley; Mike Velec; Kristy Brock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Finite-element modeling of compression and gravity on a population of breast phantoms for multimodality imaging simulation.

Authors:  Gregory M Sturgeon; Nooshin Kiarashi; Joseph Y Lo; E Samei; W P Segars
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Image similarity and tissue overlaps as surrogates for image registration accuracy: widely used but unreliable.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Simulation-based joint estimation of body deformation and elasticity parameters for medical image analysis.

Authors:  Huai-Ping Lee; Mark Foskey; Marc Niethammer; Pavel Krajcevski; Ming Lin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Simultaneous Estimation of Elasticity for Multiple Deformable Bodies.

Authors:  Shan Yang; Ming Lin
Journal:  Comput Animat Virtual Worlds       Date:  2015 May-Aug       Impact factor: 1.020

10.  The effect of intramuscular fat on skeletal muscle mechanics: implications for the elderly and obese.

Authors:  Hadi Rahemi; Nilima Nigam; James M Wakeling
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.