| Literature DB >> 30082856 |
Hideyuki Arita1,2,3,4, Manabu Kinoshita5,6, Atsushi Kawaguchi7, Masamichi Takahashi8, Yoshitaka Narita8, Yuzo Terakawa2,9, Naohiro Tsuyuguchi2,9,10, Yoshiko Okita2,11, Masahiro Nonaka2,11,12, Shusuke Moriuchi2,11,13, Masatoshi Takagaki2,14, Yasunori Fujimoto2,3, Junya Fukai2,15, Shuichi Izumoto2,10, Kenichi Ishibashi2,16, Yoshikazu Nakajima2,17, Tomoko Shofuda2,18, Daisuke Kanematsu2,19, Ema Yoshioka2,19, Yoshinori Kodama2,20,21, Masayuki Mano2,21, Kanji Mori2,22, Koichi Ichimura4, Yonehiro Kanemura2,19.
Abstract
Molecular biological characterization of tumors has become a pivotal procedure for glioma patient care. The aim of this study is to build conventional MRI-based radiomics model to predict genetic alterations within grade II/III gliomas attempting to implement lesion location information in the model to improve diagnostic accuracy. One-hundred and ninety-nine grade II/III gliomas patients were enrolled. Three molecular subtypes were identified: IDH1/2-mutant, IDH1/2-mutant with TERT promoter mutation, and IDH-wild type. A total of 109 radiomics features from 169 MRI datasets and location information from 199 datasets were extracted. Prediction modeling for genetic alteration was trained via LASSO regression for 111 datasets and validated by the remaining 58 datasets. IDH mutation was detected with an accuracy of 0.82 for the training set and 0.83 for the validation set without lesion location information. Diagnostic accuracy improved to 0.85 for the training set and 0.87 for the validation set when lesion location information was implemented. Diagnostic accuracy for predicting 3 molecular subtypes of grade II/III gliomas was 0.74 for the training set and 0.56 for the validation set with lesion location information implemented. Conventional MRI-based radiomics is one of the most promising strategies that may lead to a non-invasive diagnostic technique for molecular characterization of grade II/III gliomas.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30082856 PMCID: PMC6078954 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30273-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Overview of the analyzed cohort and image analyses (radiomics) with voxel-based lesion mapping. (A) Landscape of genetic and pathological lesions of the cohort is presented. Genetic status and central pathological reviews are shown by color as indicated. (B) Kaplan-Meier curves for the three types of tumors from the analyzed cohort are presented. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by considering the IDH, TERT co-mutated oligo. group as a reference. (C) Overview of radiomics is presented. Detailed methods for analysis are descried in Table S2. (D) Color-coded voxel-wise lesion mapping of the three different molecular subtypes of this cohort. Frequency of the locations of the brain affected by each molecular subtype are color coded as indicated. Detailed mapping is provided in Fig. S1–3. (E) Random permutation analysis shows locations that exhibited statistically significant differences in spatial distribution of the lesion among the three different molecular subtypes of the analyzed cohort. Detailed mapping is provided in Fig. S4.
Figure 2Radiomics measurements. (A) Overview of radiomics of the current grade II/III gliomas cohort is shown. Major components of the analysis are listed on the left side of the figure in rows. (B) Measurements with an extremely low p value (<0.001) with one-way ANOVA are presented. Each colored bar represents the different molecular subtype of the tumor as in (A). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. More details can be found in Tables S1 and 3.
Figure 3Correlation matrix heat map of radiomics. The correlation matrix of all radiomic parameters is visualized in a heat map. The magnitude of the correlation is indicated in the color bar.
Figure 4IDH mutation predictive modeling with and without lesion location information radiomics. (A) Overall diagnostic accuracy for the training set and the validation set is shown. Diagnostic accuracy without lesion location information was as high as 0.82 for the training set and 0.83 for the validation set. This accuracy further improved to 0.85 (p = 0.01) and 0.87 (p = 0.04) respectively by including lesion location info. Sensitivity and negative predictive value also improved significantly by implementing lesion location information in predictive modeling (*p < 0.05). (B) Radiomic components significant for predictive modeling is shown. Frontal lobe tumor involvement (MNI_str_loc.04) was one of the most significant features for being the tumor to be IDH mutated, while the magnitude of contrast enhancement (Gdzscore_ara.of.Gd.) was for IDH-wt. Averages and standard deviations of 5 repetitive analyses are shown for both (A) and (B). PPV stands for “positive predictive value” and NPP for “negative predictive value”.
Figure 5Radiomics predictive modeling for 3 genetic subtypes of grade II/III gliomas. (A~C) Significant radiomic components for predicting modeling enabling diagnosing 3 genetic subtypes of grade II/III gliomas are shown. (D) Overall diagnostic accuracies were 0.74 for the training set and 0.56 for the validation set. The confusion matrix is also shown to elucidate correctly and miss classified components. Averages and standard deviations of 5 repetitive analyses are shown for all the data.