Johannes Haubold1, Aydin Demircioglu2, Marcel Gratz3, Martin Glas4, Karsten Wrede5, Ulrich Sure5, Gerald Antoch6, Kathy Keyvani7, Mathias Nittka8, Stephan Kannengiesser8, Vikas Gulani9, Mark Griswold9, Ken Herrmann10, Michael Forsting2, Felix Nensa2, Lale Umutlu2. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. johannes.haubold@uk-essen.de. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. 3. Erwin L Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. 4. Division of Clinical Neurooncology, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 6. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany. 7. Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. 8. Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany. 9. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA. 10. Clinic of Nuclearmedicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The introduction of the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors has made the combined molecular and histopathological characterization of tumors a pivotal part of glioma patient management. Recent publications on radiogenomics-based prediction of the mutational status have demonstrated the predictive potential of imaging-based, non-invasive tissue characterization algorithms. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the potential of multiparametric 18F-FET PET-MRI including MR fingerprinting accelerated with machine learning and radiomic algorithms to predict tumor grading and mutational status of patients with cerebral gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 42 patients with suspected primary brain tumor without prior surgical or systemic treatment or biopsy underwent an 18F-FET PET-MRI examination. To differentiate the mutational status and the WHO grade of the cerebral tumors, support vector machine and random forest were trained with the radiomics signature of the multiparametric PET-MRI data including MR fingerprinting. Surgical sampling served as a gold standard for histopathological reference and assessment of mutational status. RESULTS: The 5-fold cross-validated area under the curve in predicting the ATRX mutation was 85.1%, MGMT mutation was 75.7%, IDH1 was 88.7%, and 1p19q was 97.8%. The area under the curve of differentiating low-grade glioma vs. high-grade glioma was 85.2%. CONCLUSION: 18F-FET PET-MRI and MR fingerprinting enable high-quality imaging-based tumor decoding and phenotyping for differentiation of low-grade vs. high-grade gliomas and for prediction of the mutational status of ATRX, IDH1, and 1p19q. These initial results underline the potential of 18F-FET PET-MRI to serve as an alternative to invasive tissue characterization.
OBJECTIVES: The introduction of the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors has made the combined molecular and histopathological characterization of tumors a pivotal part of gliomapatient management. Recent publications on radiogenomics-based prediction of the mutational status have demonstrated the predictive potential of imaging-based, non-invasive tissue characterization algorithms. Hence, the aim of this study was to assess the potential of multiparametric 18F-FET PET-MRI including MR fingerprinting accelerated with machine learning and radiomic algorithms to predict tumor grading and mutational status of patients with cerebral gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 42 patients with suspected primary brain tumor without prior surgical or systemic treatment or biopsy underwent an 18F-FET PET-MRI examination. To differentiate the mutational status and the WHO grade of the cerebral tumors, support vector machine and random forest were trained with the radiomics signature of the multiparametric PET-MRI data including MR fingerprinting. Surgical sampling served as a gold standard for histopathological reference and assessment of mutational status. RESULTS: The 5-fold cross-validated area under the curve in predicting the ATRX mutation was 85.1%, MGMT mutation was 75.7%, IDH1 was 88.7%, and 1p19q was 97.8%. The area under the curve of differentiating low-grade glioma vs. high-grade glioma was 85.2%. CONCLUSION: 18F-FET PET-MRI and MR fingerprinting enable high-quality imaging-based tumor decoding and phenotyping for differentiation of low-grade vs. high-grade gliomas and for prediction of the mutational status of ATRX, IDH1, and 1p19q. These initial results underline the potential of 18F-FET PET-MRI to serve as an alternative to invasive tissue characterization.
Authors: Ben Shofty; Moran Artzi; Dafna Ben Bashat; Gilad Liberman; Oz Haim; Alon Kashanian; Felix Bokstein; Deborah T Blumenthal; Zvi Ram; Tal Shahar Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Antoine Verger; Christian P Filss; Philipp Lohmann; Gabriele Stoffels; Michael Sabel; Hans J Wittsack; Elena Rota Kops; Norbert Galldiks; Gereon R Fink; Nadim J Shah; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-08-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Egesta Lopci; Marco Riva; Laura Olivari; Fabio Raneri; Riccardo Soffietti; Arnoldo Piccardo; Alberto Bizzi; Pierina Navarria; Anna Maria Ascolese; Roberta Rudà; Bethania Fernandes; Federico Pessina; Marco Grimaldi; Matteo Simonelli; Marco Rossi; Tommaso Alfieri; Paolo Andrea Zucali; Marta Scorsetti; Lorenzo Bello; Arturo Chiti Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Javier Arbizu; S Tejada; J M Marti-Climent; R Diez-Valle; E Prieto; G Quincoces; C Vigil; M A Idoate; J L Zubieta; I Peñuelas; J A Richter Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold Journal: Nature Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stephen P Jordan; Siyuan Hu; Ignacio Rozada; Debra F McGivney; Rasim Boyacioğlu; Darryl C Jacob; Sherry Huang; Michael Beverland; Helmut G Katzgraber; Matthias Troyer; Mark A Griswold; Dan Ma Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aydin Demircioglu; Johannes Grueneisen; Marc Ingenwerth; Oliver Hoffmann; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Elizabeth Morris; Johannes Haubold; Michael Forsting; Felix Nensa; Lale Umutlu Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240