Literature DB >> 27353503

Multimodal MRI features predict isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype in high-grade gliomas.

Biqi Zhang1, Ken Chang1, Shakti Ramkissoon1, Shyam Tanguturi1, Wenya Linda Bi1, David A Reardon1, Keith L Ligon1, Brian M Alexander1, Patrick Y Wen1, Raymond Y Huang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas with mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene family confer longer overall survival relative to their IDH-wild-type counterparts. Accurate determination of the IDH genotype preoperatively may have both prognostic and diagnostic value. The current study used a machine-learning algorithm to generate a model predictive of IDH genotype in high-grade gliomas based on clinical variables and multimodal features extracted from conventional MRI.
METHODS: Preoperative MRIs were obtained for 120 patients with primary grades III (n = 35) and IV (n = 85) glioma in this retrospective study. IDH genotype was confirmed for grade III (32/35, 91%) and IV (22/85, 26%) tumors by immunohistochemistry, spectrometry-based mutation genotyping (OncoMap), or multiplex exome sequencing (OncoPanel). IDH1 and IDH2 mutations were mutually exclusive, and all mutated tumors were collapsed into one IDH-mutated cohort. Cases were randomly assigned to either the training (n = 90) or validation cohort (n = 30). A total of 2970 imaging features were extracted from pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and apparent diffusion coefficient map. Using a random forest algorithm, nonredundant features were integrated with clinical data to generate a model predictive of IDH genotype.
RESULTS: Our model achieved accuracies of 86% (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.8830) in the training cohort and 89% (AUC = 0.9231) in the validation cohort. Features with the highest predictive value included patient age as well as parametric intensity, texture, and shape features.
CONCLUSION: Using a machine-learning algorithm, we achieved accurate prediction of IDH genotype in high-grade gliomas with preoperative clinical and MRI features.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; high-grade glioma; isocitrate dehydrogenase; machine learning; prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27353503      PMCID: PMC5193019          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/now121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   13.029


  49 in total

1.  MR Imaging-Based Analysis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: Estimation of IDH1 Mutation Status.

Authors:  K Yamashita; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Kikuchi; R Hatae; K Yoshimoto; M Mizoguchi; S O Suzuki; T Yoshiura; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Radiogenomics and imaging phenotypes in glioblastoma: novel observations and correlation with molecular characteristics.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Imaging patterns predict patient survival and molecular subtype in glioblastoma via machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Luke Macyszyn; Hamed Akbari; Jared M Pisapia; Xiao Da; Mark Attiah; Vadim Pigrish; Yingtao Bi; Sharmistha Pal; Ramana V Davuluri; Laura Roccograndi; Nadia Dahmane; Maria Martinez-Lage; George Biros; Ronald L Wolf; Michel Bilello; Donald M O'Rourke; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Clinical implementation of integrated whole-genome copy number and mutation profiling for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Shakti H Ramkissoon; Wenya Linda Bi; Steven E Schumacher; Lori A Ramkissoon; Sam Haidar; David Knoff; Adrian Dubuc; Loreal Brown; Margot Burns; Jane B Cryan; Malak Abedalthagafi; Yun Jee Kang; Nikolaus Schultz; David A Reardon; Eudocia Q Lee; Mikael L Rinne; Andrew D Norden; Lakshmi Nayak; Sandra Ruland; Lisa M Doherty; Debra C LaFrankie; Margaret Horvath; Ayal A Aizer; Andrea Russo; Nils D Arvold; Elizabeth B Claus; Ossama Al-Mefty; Mark D Johnson; Alexandra J Golby; Ian F Dunn; E Antonio Chiocca; Lorenzo Trippa; Sandro Santagata; Rebecca D Folkerth; Philip Kantoff; Barrett J Rollins; Neal I Lindeman; Patrick Y Wen; Azra H Ligon; Rameen Beroukhim; Brian M Alexander; Keith L Ligon
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Probabilistic radiographic atlas of glioblastoma phenotypes.

Authors:  B M Ellingson; A Lai; R J Harris; J M Selfridge; W H Yong; K Das; W B Pope; P L Nghiemphu; H V Vinters; L M Liau; P S Mischel; T F Cloughesy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  IDH mutations in glioma and acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lenny Dang; Shengfang Jin; Shinsan M Su
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 11.951

7.  Vanishing contrast enhancement in malignant glioma after corticosteroid treatment.

Authors:  H S Zaki; M D Jenkinson; D G Du Plessis; T Smith; N G Rainov
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Relationship of pre-surgery metabolic and physiological MR imaging parameters to survival for patients with untreated GBM.

Authors:  Forrest W Crawford; Inas S Khayal; Colleen McGue; Suja Saraswathy; Andrea Pirzkall; Soonmee Cha; Kathleen R Lamborn; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  High throughput tools to access images from clinical archives for research.

Authors:  Shawn N Murphy; Christopher Herrick; Yanbing Wang; Taowei David Wang; Darren Sack; Katherine P Andriole; Jesse Wei; Nathaniel Reynolds; Wendy Plesniak; Bruce R Rosen; Steven Pieper; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 10.  Improving tumour heterogeneity MRI assessment with histograms.

Authors:  N Just
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  91 in total

1.  Predicting IDH mutation status in grade II gliomas using amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI.

Authors:  Shanshan Jiang; Tianyu Zou; Charles G Eberhart; Maria A V Villalobos; Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Yu Wang; Xianlong Wang; Hao Yu; Yongxing Du; Peter C M van Zijl; Zhibo Wen; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging.

Authors:  Tianwen Xie; Qiufeng Zhao; Caixia Fu; Qianming Bai; Xiaoyan Zhou; Lihua Li; Robert Grimm; Li Liu; Yajia Gu; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Machine learning studies on major brain diseases: 5-year trends of 2014-2018.

Authors:  Koji Sakai; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Extracellular Domain Mutations in Glioblastoma Present Opportunities for Clinical Imaging and Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Zev A Binder; Amy Haseley Thorne; Spyridon Bakas; E Paul Wileyto; Michel Bilello; Hamed Akbari; Saima Rathore; Sung Min Ha; Logan Zhang; Cole J Ferguson; Sonika Dahiya; Wenya Linda Bi; David A Reardon; Ahmed Idbaih; Joerg Felsberg; Bettina Hentschel; Michael Weller; Stephen J Bagley; Jennifer J D Morrissette; MacLean P Nasrallah; Jianhui Ma; Ciro Zanca; Andrew M Scott; Laura Orellana; Christos Davatzikos; Frank B Furnari; Donald M O'Rourke
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Radiomics-based machine learning methods for isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype prediction of diffuse gliomas.

Authors:  Shuang Wu; Jin Meng; Qi Yu; Ping Li; Shen Fu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  A radiomics nomogram may improve the prediction of IDH genotype for astrocytoma before surgery.

Authors:  Yan Tan; Shuai-Tong Zhang; Jing-Wei Wei; Di Dong; Xiao-Chun Wang; Guo-Qiang Yang; Jie Tian; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MRI features can predict EGFR expression in lower grade gliomas: A voxel-based radiomic analysis.

Authors:  Yiming Li; Xing Liu; Kaibin Xu; Zenghui Qian; Kai Wang; Xing Fan; Shaowu Li; Yinyan Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  MRI radiomics analysis of molecular alterations in low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Ben Shofty; Moran Artzi; Dafna Ben Bashat; Gilad Liberman; Oz Haim; Alon Kashanian; Felix Bokstein; Deborah T Blumenthal; Zvi Ram; Tal Shahar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 9.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

10.  Radiomic features predict Ki-67 expression level and survival in lower grade gliomas.

Authors:  Yiming Li; Zenghui Qian; Kaibin Xu; Kai Wang; Xing Fan; Shaowu Li; Xing Liu; Yinyan Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.