Literature DB >> 30082508

Predicting data quality in biological X-ray solution scattering.

Chenzheng Wang1, Yuexia Lin2, Devin Bougie3, Richard E Gillilan4.   

Abstract

Biological small-angle X-ray solution scattering (BioSAXS) is now widely used to gain information on biomolecules in the solution state. Often, however, it is not obvious in advance whether a particular sample will scatter strongly enough to give useful data to draw conclusions under practically achievable solution conditions. Conformational changes that appear to be large may not always produce scattering curves that are distinguishable from each other at realistic concentrations and exposure times. Emerging technologies such as time-resolved SAXS (TR-SAXS) pose additional challenges owing to small beams and short sample path lengths. Beamline optics vary in brilliance and degree of background scatter, and major upgrades and improvements to sources promise to expand the reach of these methods. Computations are developed to estimate BioSAXS sample intensity at a more detailed level than previous approaches, taking into account flux, energy, sample thickness, window material, instrumental background, detector efficiency, solution conditions and other parameters. The results are validated with calibrated experiments using standard proteins on four different beamlines with various fluxes, energies and configurations. The ability of BioSAXS to statistically distinguish a variety of conformational movements under continuous-flow time-resolved conditions is then computed on a set of matched structure pairs drawn from the Database of Macromolecular Motions (http://molmovdb.org). The feasibility of experiments is ranked according to sample consumption, a quantity that varies by over two orders of magnitude for the set of structures. In addition to photon flux, the calculations suggest that window scattering and choice of wavelength are also important factors given the short sample path lengths common in such setups.

Keywords:  BioSAXS; CHESS-U; X-ray damage; microfluidics; noise; time-resolved

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30082508      PMCID: PMC6079628          DOI: 10.1107/S2059798318005004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol        ISSN: 2059-7983            Impact factor:   7.652


  17 in total

1.  Development of diamond-based X-ray detection for high-flux beamline diagnostics.

Authors:  Jen Bohon; Erik Muller; John Smedley
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.616

2.  Windows for small-angle X-ray scattering cryostats.

Authors:  Laurence Lurio; Norbert Mulders; Mark Paetkau; Pete R Jemian; Suresh Narayanan; Alec Sandy
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.616

3.  Upgrade of MacCHESS facility for X-ray scattering of biological macromolecules in solution.

Authors:  Alvin Samuel Acerbo; Michael J Cook; Richard Edward Gillilan
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.616

4.  Limiting radiation damage for high-brilliance biological solution scattering: practical experience at the EMBL P12 beamline PETRAIII.

Authors:  Cy M Jeffries; Melissa A Graewert; Dmitri I Svergun; Clément E Blanchet
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.616

5.  Breaking the radiation damage limit with Cryo-SAXS.

Authors:  Steve P Meisburger; Matthew Warkentin; Huimin Chen; Jesse B Hopkins; Richard E Gillilan; Lois Pollack; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  X-ray radiation damage to biological macromolecules: further insights.

Authors:  Elspeth F Garman; Martin Weik
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  FoXS: a web server for rapid computation and fitting of SAXS profiles.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Michal Hammel; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Sub-millisecond time-resolved SAXS using a continuous-flow mixer and X-ray microbeam.

Authors:  Rita Graceffa; R Paul Nobrega; Raul A Barrea; Sagar V Kathuria; Srinivas Chakravarthy; Osman Bilsel; Thomas C Irving
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.616

9.  ATSAS 2.8: a comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions.

Authors:  D Franke; M V Petoukhov; P V Konarev; A Panjkovich; A Tuukkanen; H D T Mertens; A G Kikhney; N R Hajizadeh; J M Franklin; C M Jeffries; D I Svergun
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.304

10.  Quantitative evaluation of statistical errors in small-angle X-ray scattering measurements.

Authors:  Steffen M Sedlak; Linda K Bruetzel; Jan Lipfert
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  1 in total

1.  High-pressure small-angle X-ray scattering cell for biological solutions and soft materials.

Authors:  Durgesh K Rai; Richard E Gillilan; Qingqiu Huang; Robert Miller; Edmund Ting; Alexander Lazarev; Mark W Tate; Sol M Gruner
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.304

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.