Literature DB >> 32242467

Auditory-perceptual acuity in rhotic misarticulation: baseline characteristics and treatment response.

Laine Cialdella1, Heather Kabakoff1, Jonathan Preston2,3, Sarah Dugan4, Caroline Spencer4, Suzanne Boyce3,4, Mark Tiede3, D Whalen5,6, Tara McAllister1.   

Abstract

The rhotic sound /r/ is one of the latest-emerging sounds in English, and many children receive treatment for residual errors affecting /r/ that persist past the age of 9. Auditory-perceptual abilities of children with residual speech errors are thought to be different from their typically developing peers. This study examined auditory-perceptual acuity in children with residual speech errors affecting /r/ and the relation of these skills to production accuracy, both before and after a period of treatment incorporating visual biofeedback. Identification of items along an /r/-/w/ continuum was assessed prior to treatment. Production accuracy for /r/ was acoustically measured from standard/r/stimulability probes elicited before and after treatment. Fifty-nine children aged 9-15 with residual speech errors (RSE) affecting /r/ completed treatment, and forty-eight age-matched controls who completed the same auditory-perceptual task served as a comparison group. It was hypothesized that children with RSE would show lower auditory-perceptual acuity than typically developing speakers and that higher auditory-perceptual acuity would be associated with more accurate production before treatment. It was also hypothesized that auditory-perceptual acuity would serve as a mediator of treatment response. Results indicated that typically developing children have more acute perception of the /r/-/w/ contrast than children with RSE. Contrary to hypothesis, baseline auditory-perceptual acuity for /r/ did not predict baseline production severity. For baseline auditory-perceptual acuity in relation to biofeedback efficacy, there was an interaction between auditory-perceptual acuity and gender, such that higher auditory-perceptual acuity was associated with greater treatment response in female, but not male, participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perception; personalized learning; residual speech errors; rhotic misarticulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32242467      PMCID: PMC7541403          DOI: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1739749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  56 in total

1.  Phonological awareness and phonemic perception in 4-year-old children with delayed expressive phonology skills.

Authors:  Susan Rvachew; Alyssa Ohberg; Meghann Grawburg; Joan Heyding
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 2.  Emergence and Prevalence of Persistent and Residual Speech Errors.

Authors:  Peter Flipsen
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.761

3.  Ultrasound in speech therapy with adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Barbara Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi; Marcy Adler-Bock
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

4.  Acquisition, retention, and generalization of rhotics with and without ultrasound visual feedback.

Authors:  Greta M Sjolie; Megan C Leece; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS).

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Marios Fourakis; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Lohmeier; Jane L McSweeny; Nancy L Potter; Alison R Scheer-Cohen; Edythe A Strand; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Authors:  Michael J Hammer; Mallory A Krueger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The use of ultrasound in remediation of North American English /r/ in 2 adolescents.

Authors:  Marcy Adler-Bock; Barbara May Bernhardt; Bryan Gick; Penelope Bacsfalvi
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Speech disorders among college freshmen: a 13-year survey.

Authors:  G L Culton
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1986-02

9.  Variable Practice to Enhance Speech Learning in Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: A Single Case Experimental Study.

Authors:  Jonathan L Preston; Megan C Leece; Kerry McNamara; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Differential Effects of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Speech Errors.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Heather Campbell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Toward an index of oral somatosensory acuity: Comparison of three measures in adults.

Authors:  Olesia Gritsyk; Heather Kabakoff; Joanne Jingwen Li; Samantha Ayala; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2021-03-30

2.  Characterizing sensorimotor profiles in children with residual speech sound disorder: a pilot study.

Authors:  Heather Kabakoff; Olesia Gritsyk; Daphna Harel; Mark Tiede; Jonathan L Preston; D H Whalen; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization Design.

Authors:  Nina R Benway; Elaine R Hitchcock; Tara McAllister; Graham Tomkins Feeny; Jennifer Hill; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Examining the Relationship Between Speech Perception, Production Distinctness, and Production Variability.

Authors:  Hung-Shao Cheng; Caroline A Niziolek; Adam Buchwald; Tara McAllister
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.