Megan L Rischall1, Arlene S Chung2, Ramin Tabatabai3, Christopher Doty4, Danielle Hart1. 1. Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis MN. 2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York NY. 3. Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles CA. 4. University of Kentucky Lexington KY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shift work can negatively impact an individual's health, wellness, and quality of work. Optimal schedule design can mitigate some of these effects. The American College of Emergency Physicians has published schedule design guidelines to increase wellness and longevity in the field, but these guidelines are difficult to apply to emergency medicine (EM) residents given their high shift burdens and other scheduling constraints. Little is known is known about EM resident scheduling preferences or ideal schedule design in the context of residency training. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine whether EM resident schedule design preferences are consistent with current scheduling guidelines for shift workers and to gather information on scheduling practices that are important to residents. METHODS: We surveyed residents at four allopathic EM residency programs and assessed residents' preferences on various schedule design features including shift length, circadian scheduling, night shift scheduling, and impact of schedule design on personal wellness. RESULTS: Of the 144 residents surveyed, 98% of residents felt that their shift schedule was a key factor in their overall wellness. Residents agreed with shift work guidelines regarding the importance of circadian scheduling (65% favorable), although rated the ability to request a day off and have a full weekend off as more important (84 and 78% favorable responses, respectively). Recommended guidelines promote shorter shifts, but only 24% of residents preferred 8-hour shifts compared to 57, 71, and 43% of residents preferring 9-, 10-, and 12-hour shifts, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of residents preferred their nights to be scheduled in one sequence per 4-week period, a night scheduling strategy most at odds with recommended guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine resident scheduling preferences are not universally consistent with shift work guidelines, likely due to the distinct circumstances of residency training. Residents identify schedule design as a significant factor in their overall wellness.
BACKGROUND: Shift work can negatively impact an individual's health, wellness, and quality of work. Optimal schedule design can mitigate some of these effects. The American College of Emergency Physicians has published schedule design guidelines to increase wellness and longevity in the field, but these guidelines are difficult to apply to emergency medicine (EM) residents given their high shift burdens and other scheduling constraints. Little is known is known about EM resident scheduling preferences or ideal schedule design in the context of residency training. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine whether EM resident schedule design preferences are consistent with current scheduling guidelines for shift workers and to gather information on scheduling practices that are important to residents. METHODS: We surveyed residents at four allopathic EM residency programs and assessed residents' preferences on various schedule design features including shift length, circadian scheduling, night shift scheduling, and impact of schedule design on personal wellness. RESULTS: Of the 144 residents surveyed, 98% of residents felt that their shift schedule was a key factor in their overall wellness. Residents agreed with shift work guidelines regarding the importance of circadian scheduling (65% favorable), although rated the ability to request a day off and have a full weekend off as more important (84 and 78% favorable responses, respectively). Recommended guidelines promote shorter shifts, but only 24% of residents preferred 8-hour shifts compared to 57, 71, and 43% of residents preferring 9-, 10-, and 12-hour shifts, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of residents preferred their nights to be scheduled in one sequence per 4-week period, a night scheduling strategy most at odds with recommended guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine resident scheduling preferences are not universally consistent with shift work guidelines, likely due to the distinct circumstances of residency training. Residents identify schedule design as a significant factor in their overall wellness.
Authors: Catherine A Marco; Lewis S Nelson; Jill M Baren; Michael S Beeson; Michael L Carius; Carl R Chudnofsky; Marianne Gausche-Hill; Deepi G Goyal; Samuel M Keim; Terry Kowalenko; Robert L Muelleman; Kevin B Joldersma Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Arlene S Chung; Matthew L Wong; Leon D Sanchez; Dave W Lu; Rita A Manfredi; Hannah Mishkin; Sheryl Heron; Andra L Blomkalns Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2018-11-27
Authors: Arlene Chung; Sarah Mott; Katie Rebillot; Simiao Li-Sauerwine; Sneha Shah; Wendy C Coates; Lalena M Yarris Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-12-19