M T Steele1, O J Ma, W A Watson, H A Thomas. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Truman Medical Center, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, 64108, USA. steelemt@trumed1.trumanmed.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the shift lengths currently worked by emergency medicine (EM) residents and their shift length preferences, and to determine factors associated with EM residents' subjective tolerance of shiftwork. METHODS: A survey was sent to EM-2 through EM-4 allopathic EM residents in May 1996. This questionnaire assessed the residents' shift length worked, shift length preferences, night shift schedules, and self-reported ability to overcome drowsiness, sleep flexibility, and morningness-eveningness tendencies. When providing shift length preferences, the residents were asked to assume a constant total number of hours scheduled per month. RESULTS: Seventy-eight programs participated, and 62% of 1,554 eligible residents returned usable surveys. Current shift lengths worked were 8 hours (12%), 10 hours (13%), 12 hours (37%), combinations of 8-hour, 10-hour, or 12-hour (34%) shifts, and other combinations (4%). Seventy-three percent of the respondents indicated that they preferred to work 8-hour or 10-hour shifts, and only 21% preferred a 12-hour shift. Shiftwork tolerance was recorded as: not well at all (2%), not very well (14%), fairly well (70%), and very well (14%). The EM residents' eveningness preference, ability to overcome drowsiness, sleep flexibility, younger age, and having no children at home were all associated with greater shiftwork tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residents generally tolerate shiftwork well and prefer 8-hour or 10-hour shift lengths compared with 12-hour shift lengths. Emergency medicine residencies with 12-hour shifts should consider changing residents' shifts to shorter shifts.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the shift lengths currently worked by emergency medicine (EM) residents and their shift length preferences, and to determine factors associated with EM residents' subjective tolerance of shiftwork. METHODS: A survey was sent to EM-2 through EM-4 allopathic EM residents in May 1996. This questionnaire assessed the residents' shift length worked, shift length preferences, night shift schedules, and self-reported ability to overcome drowsiness, sleep flexibility, and morningness-eveningness tendencies. When providing shift length preferences, the residents were asked to assume a constant total number of hours scheduled per month. RESULTS: Seventy-eight programs participated, and 62% of 1,554 eligible residents returned usable surveys. Current shift lengths worked were 8 hours (12%), 10 hours (13%), 12 hours (37%), combinations of 8-hour, 10-hour, or 12-hour (34%) shifts, and other combinations (4%). Seventy-three percent of the respondents indicated that they preferred to work 8-hour or 10-hour shifts, and only 21% preferred a 12-hour shift. Shiftwork tolerance was recorded as: not well at all (2%), not very well (14%), fairly well (70%), and very well (14%). The EM residents' eveningness preference, ability to overcome drowsiness, sleep flexibility, younger age, and having no children at home were all associated with greater shiftwork tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residents generally tolerate shiftwork well and prefer 8-hour or 10-hour shift lengths compared with 12-hour shift lengths. Emergency medicine residencies with 12-hour shifts should consider changing residents' shifts to shorter shifts.