Literature DB >> 30030710

Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

E Rocafort1,2, M Enciso3, A Leza4, J Sarasa3, J Aizpurua5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated if automated TLI selection may be a valuable strategy to identify those euploid embryos with the best chances of success.
METHODS: This is a unicentric and retrospective study involving 244 patients undergoing preimplantational genetic screening (PGS) cycles with autologous oocytes or oocyte donation (OD) with single euploid embryo transferred. We examined euploid embryos selected for transfer based on morphology evaluation alone (PGS-only; control group) or by assessment using an automated TLI system (Eeva™; PGS-TLI group).
RESULTS: In both, autologous oocytes and OD patients, significantly better implantation and clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were obtained in the PGS-TLI group when euploid embryos with high implantation potential as predicted by the automated TLI System (Eeva™) were transferred compared with the PGS-only group. This improvement was also observed when only transfers of good morphological quality embryos were compared. TLI categories showed significant differences on blastocyst formation and euploidy rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated TLI combined with PGS is a useful prognostic tool to identify euploid embryos with the highest potential for implantation and pregnancy. Further, these results provide evidence that a healthy pregnancy does not only depend upon normal chromosomal status.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated time-lapse imaging; In vitro fertilization; Oocyte donation; Pregnancy rates; Preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030710      PMCID: PMC6133820          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1265-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  66 in total

1.  Abnormal embryonic karyotype is the most frequent cause of recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  Mayumi Sugiura-Ogasawara; Yasuhiko Ozaki; Kinue Katano; Nobuhiro Suzumori; Tamao Kitaori; Eita Mizutani
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI: a sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Paul De Sutter; Jan Gerris; Marc Dhont
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Mohamad Irani; David Reichman; Alex Robles; Alexis Melnick; Owen Davis; Nikica Zaninovic; Kangpu Xu; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.

Authors:  Belén Aparicio-Ruiz; Natalia Basile; Sonia Pérez Albalá; Fernando Bronet; José Remohí; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Elias M Dahdouh; Jacques Balayla; Juan Antonio García-Velasco
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome--United States, 1999 to 2010.

Authors:  Marissa L Steinberg; Sheree Boulet; Dmitry Kissin; Lee Warner; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Increasing the probability of selecting chromosomally normal embryos by time-lapse morphokinetics analysis.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Maria del Carmen Nogales; Fernando Bronet; Mireia Florensa; Marissa Riqueiros; Lorena Rodrigo; Juan García-Velasco; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS.

Authors:  Alison Campbell; Simon Fishel; Natalie Bowman; Samantha Duffy; Mark Sedler; Simon Thornton
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Mitochondrial DNA content as a viability score in human euploid embryos: less is better.

Authors:  Antonio Diez-Juan; Carmen Rubio; Carlos Marin; Sebastian Martinez; Nasser Al-Asmar; Marcia Riboldi; Patricia Díaz-Gimeno; Diana Valbuena; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  3 in total

1.  Lack of evidence to support the superiority of TLI over conventional morphology to select among euploid embryos determined by PGT-A.

Authors:  Yi Guo; Henan Zhang; Shuaishuai Guo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The Clinical Efficacy of Personalized Embryo Transfer Guided by the Endometrial Receptivity Array/Analysis on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhenteng Liu; Xuemei Liu; Meimei Wang; Huishan Zhao; Shunzhi He; Shoucui Lai; Qinglan Qu; Xinrong Wang; Dongmei Zhao; Hongchu Bao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology.

Authors:  Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-03-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.