Literature DB >> 27530063

Automatic time-lapse instrument is superior to single-point morphology observation for selecting viable embryos: retrospective study in oocyte donation.

Belén Aparicio-Ruiz1, Natalia Basile2, Sonia Pérez Albalá1, Fernando Bronet2, José Remohí1, Marcos Meseguer3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the different categories provided by a commercial diagnostic test with blastocyst formation, quality, implantation potential, and ongoing pregnancy (OPR) for the purpose of validating the automatic annotations and the classification algorithm.
DESIGN: Observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort study.
SETTING: University-affiliated private IVF center. PATIENT(S): A total of 3,002 embryos, including 521 transferred embryos with known implantation, from 626 IVF cycles that were incubated in a conventional incubator and monitored with an automatic time-lapse test. INTERVENTIONS(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo selection was based on morphology and the classification provided by a commercial diagnostic test. Implantation was the primary end point, and OPR, blastocyst formation (BR), and embryo morphology were secondary end points. RESULT(S): BR and number of optimal blastocysts were related to the classification test. This correlation was also observed when analyzing implantation rates (day 3 transfer: high 38.2%, medium 31.7% and low 26.1%; day 5 transfer: high 66.7%, medium 50%, low 31%). Patients where no high embryos were transferred (n = 75) had an OPR of 46.70%, and those patients where at least one high embryo was transferred (n = 109) significantly increased OPR to 67%. A logistic regression analysis studying other confounding factors (day of transfer, number of oocytes obtained, and embryo morphology classification) was included. In that model, if at least one of the embryos was labeled as high, OPR was 2.567 times higher than a cycle where no high embryos were transferred. CONCLUSION(S): Our study presents, to our knowledge, the largest set of transferred embryos after time-lapse analysis with the use of an automatic time-lapse test. The provided classification was related to reproductive outcome. Our results suggest that the automated embryo diagnostic test provided extra information to the embryologist to select the best embryos, independently from clinical features of the patient or day of transfer.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo; automatic; implantation; morphokinetics; pregnancy; time lapse

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530063     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  National survey on use of time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories.

Authors:  Andrey V Dolinko; L V Farland; D J Kaser; S A Missmer; C Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Contraction behaviour reduces embryo competence in high-quality euploid blastocysts.

Authors:  Xavier Viñals Gonzalez; Rabi Odia; Suzanne Cawood; Matthew Gaunt; Wael Saab; Svidrya Seshadri; Paul Serhal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.

Authors:  Giovanni Coticchio; Barry Behr; Alison Campbell; Marcos Meseguer; Dean E Morbeck; Valerio Pisaturo; Carlos E Plancha; Denny Sakkas; Yanwen Xu; Thomas D'Hooghe; Evelyn Cottell; Kersti Lundin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Inter-laboratory agreement on embryo classification and clinical decision: Conventional morphological assessment vs. time lapse.

Authors:  Luis Martínez-Granados; María Serrano; Antonio González-Utor; Nereyda Ortíz; Vicente Badajoz; Enrique Olaya; Nicolás Prados; Montse Boada; Jose A Castilla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Towards Improving Embryo Prioritization: Parallel Next Generation Sequencing of DNA and RNA from a Single Trophectoderm Biopsy.

Authors:  Noga Fuchs Weizman; Brandon A Wyse; Ran Antes; Zenon Ibarrientos; Mugundhine Sangaralingam; Gelareh Motamedi; Valeriy Kuznyetsov; Svetlana Madjunkova; Clifford L Librach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Spontaneous blastocyst collapse as an embryo marker of low pregnancy outcome: A Time-Lapse study.

Authors:  Romualdo Sciorio; K J Thong; Susan J Pickering
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-01-30

9.  Clinical pregnancy is significantly associated with the blastocyst width and area: a time-lapse study.

Authors:  Romualdo Sciorio; D Thong; K J Thong; Susan J Pickering
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Transparent collaboration between industry and academia can serve unmet patient need and contribute to reproductive public health.

Authors:  Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.