Literature DB >> 28069172

Morphologic grading of euploid blastocysts influences implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates.

Mohamad Irani1, David Reichman2, Alex Robles3, Alexis Melnick1, Owen Davis1, Nikica Zaninovic1, Kangpu Xu1, Zev Rosenwaks1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blastocyst grading can predict pregnancy outcomes in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) of euploid blastocysts.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Women who underwent FET of euploid embryo(s) between January 2013 and December 2015, with blastocysts were divided into four groups based on their morphologic grading before cryopreservation: excellent (≥3AA), good (3-6AB, 3-6BA, 1-2AA), average (3-6BB, 3-6AC, 3-6CA, 1-2AB, 1-2BA), and poor (1-6BC, 1-6CB, 1-6CC, 1-2BB). INTERVENTION(S): FET. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR). RESULT(S): A total of 417 FET cycles (477 embryos) were included. Excellent-quality embryos (n = 38) yielded a statistically significantly higher OPR than poor-quality embryos (n = 106) (84.2% vs. 35.8%; adjusted odds ratio 11.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.8-32.1) and average-quality embryos (n = 197) (84.2% vs. 55.8%; adjusted odds ratio 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-13.3). Good-quality embryos (n = 76) were associated with a statistically significantly higher OPR than poor-quality embryos (61.8% vs. 35.8%). These odds ratios were adjusted for patient's age, body mass index, number of transferred embryos, type of frozen cycle, peak endometrial thickness, day of trophectoderm biopsy (5 or 6), and total number of euploid embryos for each patient. An inner cell mass grade of A yielded a statistically significantly higher OPR than ICM grade C (76.2% vs. 13.5%) or grade B (76.2% vs. 53.6%) after controlling for all confounders. CONCLUSION(S): Contrary to prior published studies, the current data suggest that blastocyst morphologic grading and particularly inner cell mass grade is a useful predictor of OPR per euploid embryo. Morphologic grading should be used to help in the selection among euploid blastocysts.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst morphologic grading; IVF outcome; PGS; euploid embryo; inner cell mass; preimplantation genetic screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28069172     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  34 in total

1.  Do patient factors influence embryologists' decisions to freeze borderline blastocysts?

Authors:  T Burns; E R Hammond; L Cree; D E Morbeck; N S Consedine
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Hui Ji; Yuxi Zhou; Shanren Cao; Junqiang Zhang; Xiufeng Ling; Chun Zhao; Rong Shen
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.

Authors:  Ange Wang; Jonathan Kort; Barry Behr; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Natural frozen embryo transfer with hCG booster leads to improved cycle outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  David E Reichman; Claire R Stewart; Zev Rosenwaks
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Transfer the best and biopsy the rest? Blastocyst euploidy rates differ by morphology and day of biopsy.

Authors:  Katherine E McDaniel; Michael S Awadalla; Lynda K McGinnis; Ali Ahmady
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  The effect of maternal high-fat/high-sugar diet on offspring oocytes and early embryo development.

Authors:  E Andreas; M Reid; W Zhang; K H Moley
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers with blastocysts derived from different cell numbers on day 3: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Haibin Zhao; Hui Liu; Mei Li; Keliang Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  What Are the Live Birth and Multiple Pregnancy Rates When 1 Versus 2 Low-Quality Blastocysts Are Transferred in a Cryopreserved Cycle? a Retrospective Cohort Study, Stratified for Age, Embryo Quality, and Oocyte Donor Cycles.

Authors:  Suha Arab; Ahmad Badegiesh; Sarah Aldhaheri; Weon-Young Son; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.060

10.  Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

Authors:  Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.