Literature DB >> 30026646

Intraocular pressure measurements in cattle, sheep, and goats with 2 different types of tonometers.

Nina Peche1, Johanna Corinna Eule1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate normal intraocular pressure (IOP) values of cattle, sheep, and goats with a rebound tonometer [TonoVet (TV)] and an applanation tonometer [Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA)] and to determine correction functions for the 2 devices. A total of 60 healthy cattle, sheep, and goats (20 of each) underwent slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Intraocular pressure (IOP) readings were taken from both eyes with the 2 different tonometers and statistically analyzed. For calibration purposes, the IOP was preset on each instrument at 5 to 60 mmHg using 5 mmHg increments in 10 bovine, 8 ovine, and 6 caprine freshly enucleated eyes. Readings were taken with both tonometers at each interval and compared to the manometrically controlled IOP (Mann-Whitney U-test, P ≤ 0.05; Bland-Altman plot, and regression analysis). The median IOP measurements (min to max) obtained with the TV were 23 mmHg (12 to 40 mmHg), 11 mmHg (7 to 20 mmHg), and 23 mmHg (9 to 37 mmHg) for cattle, sheep, and goats, respectively. Using the TPA, the median IOP measurements were 16 mmHg (8 to 27 mmHg), 10 mmHg (5 to 18 mmHg), and 13 mmHg (4 to 25 mmHg) for cattle, sheep, and goats, respectively. There were statistically significant differences between the readings taken with the TV and the TPA in all species (Wilcoxon-test, P ≤ 0.05). All measurements obtained with the TV and the TPA during the calibration procedure differed statistically significantly from the manometrically controlled IOP measurements (Mann-Whitney U-test, P ≤ 0.05). For both instruments, regression formulas were calculated to correct the measurements. Both tonometers can be used effectively to assess intraocular pressure in ruminants, using the specific regression formulas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30026646      PMCID: PMC6040018     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  25 in total

1.  [Further contribution to applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  [Applanation tonometry].

Authors:  H GOLDMANN; T SCHMIDT
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1957-10       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Tono-Pen XL calibration curves for cats, cows and sheep.

Authors:  Christopher L Passaglia; Xiaoli Guo; Jie Chen; John B Troy
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.644

4.  Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs.

Authors:  D R Priehs; G G Gum; R D Whitley; L E Moore
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Comparison of simultaneous readings of intraocular pressure in rabbits using Perkins handheld, Tono-Pen XL, and TonoVet tonometers.

Authors:  Giedrius Kalesnykas; Hannu Uusitalo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Effects of different mydriatics on intraocular pressure, pupil diameter, and ruminal and intestinal motility in healthy sheep.

Authors:  Alexandre P Ribeiro; Roberta M Crivelaro; Pedro Paulo M Teixeira; Dunia Y Trujillo; Patrícia J Guimarães; Wilter Ricardo R Vicente; Bianca da C Martins; José Luiz Laus
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 1.644

7.  Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Silvia Franco Andrade; Tatiana Cremonezi; Cristiane Aparecida Miranda Zachi; Caroline Ferreira Lonchiati; Juliana Dalarrosa Amatuzzi; Keila Priscilla Sakamoto; Paulo Augusto de Arruda Mello
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.644

8.  Intraocular pressure in normal dairy cattle.

Authors:  G.G. Gum; K.N. Gelatt; D.N. Miller; E.O. MacKay
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.644

9.  Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.

Authors:  M Leiva; C Naranjo; M T Peña
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.644

10.  Validation of the TonoVet® rebound tonometer in normal and glaucomatous cats.

Authors:  Gillian J McLellan; Jeremy P Kemmerling; Julie A Kiland
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 1.644

View more
  5 in total

1.  Whole-exome sequencing analysis in a case of primary congenital glaucoma due to the partial uniparental isodisomy.

Authors:  Parisima Ghaffarian Zavarzadeh; Morteza Bonyadi; Zahra Abedi
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2022-09-30

2.  Comparison of two rebound tonometers in healthy horses.

Authors:  Minna P Mustikka; Elina M Pietilä; Anna K Mykkänen; Thomas S C Grönthal
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 1.644

Review 3.  Technological advances in ocular trabecular meshwork in vitro models for glaucoma research.

Authors:  Maria Bikuna-Izagirre; Javier Aldazabal; Leire Extramiana; Javier Moreno-Montañés; Elena Carnero; Jacobo Paredes
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.395

4.  Intraocular pressure measurements using the TONOVET® rebound tonometer: Influence of the probe-cornea distance.

Authors:  Blanche D Rodrigues; Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira; Mariza Bortolini; André T Somma; András M Komáromy; Peterson Triches Dornbusch
Journal:  Vet Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 1.644

5.  A comparative study on intraocular pressure under various anesthetics in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  Hong-Soo Lee; Han Na Suh; Da-Hee Kim; Sung-Hwan Kim; Min-Sung Kang
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2021-06-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.