Literature DB >> 26068200

Stapes Vibration in the Chinchilla Middle Ear: Relation to Behavioral and Auditory-Nerve Thresholds.

Luis Robles1, Andrei N Temchin, Yun-Hui Fan, Mario A Ruggero.   

Abstract

The vibratory responses to tones of the stapes and incus were measured in the middle ears of deeply anesthetized chinchillas using a wide-band acoustic-stimulus system and a laser velocimeter coupled to a microscope. With the laser beam at an angle of about 40 ° relative to the axis of stapes piston-like motion, the sensitivity-vs.-frequency curves of vibrations at the head of the stapes and the incus lenticular process were very similar to each other but larger, in the range 15-30 kHz, than the vibrations of the incus just peripheral to the pedicle. With the laser beam aligned with the axis of piston-like stapes motion, vibrations of the incus just peripheral to its pedicle were very similar to the vibrations of the lenticular process or the stapes head measured at the 40 ° angle. Thus, the pedicle prevents transmission to the stapes of components of incus vibration not aligned with the axis of stapes piston-like motion. The mean magnitude curve of stapes velocities is fairly flat over a wide frequency range, with a mean value of about 0.19 mm(.)(s Pa(-1)), has a high-frequency cutoff of 25 kHz (measured at -3 dB re the mean value), and decreases with a slope of about -60 dB/octave at higher frequencies. According to our measurements, the chinchilla middle ear transmits acoustic signals into the cochlea at frequencies exceeding both the bandwidth of responses of auditory-nerve fibers and the upper cutoff of hearing. The phase lags of stapes velocity relative to ear-canal pressure increase approximately linearly, with slopes equivalent to pure delays of about 57-76 μs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26068200      PMCID: PMC4488169          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0524-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  34 in total

1.  The discordant eardrum.

Authors:  Jonathan P Fay; Sunil Puria; Charles R Steele
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Scala vestibuli pressure and three-dimensional stapes velocity measured in direct succession in gerbil.

Authors:  W F Decraemer; O de La Rochefoucauld; W Dong; S M Khanna; J J J Dirckx; E S Olson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Gerbil middle-ear sound transmission from 100 Hz to 60 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Nigel P Cooper; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. II. Dependence on spontaneous activity and relation to cochlear nonlinearity.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; N Julian Holland; J Eric Lupo; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Simultaneous measurements of ossicular velocity and intracochlear pressure leading to the cochlear input impedance in gerbil.

Authors:  O de la Rochefoucauld; W F Decraemer; S M Khanna; E S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-06

8.  Phase-locked responses to tones of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers: implications for apical cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-17

9.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Middle ear function and cochlear input impedance in chinchilla.

Authors:  Michaël C C Slama; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mapping the phase and amplitude of ossicular chain motion using sound-synchronous optical coherence vibrography.

Authors:  Antoine Ramier; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Seok-Hyun Yun
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Spectral Ripples in Round-Window Cochlear Microphonics: Evidence for Multiple Generation Mechanisms.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-16

3.  Frequency sensitivity in mammalian hearing from a fundamental nonlinear physics model of the inner ear.

Authors:  Karlis Kanders; Tom Lorimer; Florian Gomez; Ruedi Stoop
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.