Literature DB >> 30009274

Optimizing the Magnetic Dipole-Field Source for Magnetically Guided Cochlear-Implant Electrode-Array Insertions.

Lisandro Leon1,2, Frank M Warren3, Jake J Abbott1.   

Abstract

Magnetic guidance of cochlear-implant electrode arrays during insertion has been demonstrated in vitro to reduce insertion forces, which is believed to be correlated to a reduction in trauma. In those prior studies, the magnetic dipole-field source (MDS) was configured to travel on a path that would be coincident with the cochlea's modiolar axis, which was an unnecessary constraint that was useful to demonstrate feasibility. In this paper, we determine the optimal configuration (size and location) of a spherical-permanent-magnet MDS needed to accomplish guided insertions with a 100 mT field strength required at the cochlea, and we provide a methodology to perform such an optimization more generally. Based on computed-tomography scans of 30 human subjects, the MDS should be lateral-to and slightly anterior-to the cochlea with an approximate radius (mean and standard deviation across subjects) of 64 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively. We compare these results to the modiolar configuration and find that the volume of the MDS can be reduced by a factor of five with a 43% reduction in its radius by moving it to the optimal location. We conservatively estimate that the magnetic forces generated by the optimal configuration are two orders of magnitude below the threshold needed to puncture the basilar membrane. Although subject-specific optimal configurations are computed in this paper, a one-size-fits-all version with a radius of approximately 75 mm is more robust to registration error and likely more practical. Finally, we explain how to translate the results obtained to an electromagnetic MDS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; magnetics; optimization; robot-assisted surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 30009274      PMCID: PMC6044464          DOI: 10.1142/S2424905X18500046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Robot Res


  12 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear implantation: current and future device options.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Sean O McMenomey
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.

Authors:  Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Stephen J Rebscher; J Thomas Roland; William Luxford; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Percutaneous cochlear access using bone-mounted, customized drill guides: demonstration of concept in vitro.

Authors:  Frank M Warren; Ramya Balachandran; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Matthew L Carlson; René H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; David S Haynes; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Characterization of intracochlear rupture forces in fresh human cadaveric cochleae.

Authors:  Daniel Schuster; Louis B Kratchman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

9.  In vitro accuracy evaluation of image-guided robot system for direct cochlear access.

Authors:  Brett Bell; Nicolas Gerber; Tom Williamson; Kate Gavaghan; Wilhelm Wimmer; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Lisandro Leon; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sensorless Estimation of the Planar Distal Shape of a Tip-Actuated Endoscope.

Authors:  Piotr R Slawinski; Nabil Simaan; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2019-07-04

2.  Thermal Model of an Omnimagnet for Performance Assessment and Temperature Control.

Authors:  Fateme Esmailie; Matthew S Cavilla; Jake J Abbott; Tim A Ameel
Journal:  J Therm Sci Eng Appl       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.470

3.  Magnetic Steering of Robotically Inserted Lateral-wall Cochlear-implant Electrode Arrays Reduces Forces on the Basilar Membrane In Vitro.

Authors:  Cameron M Hendricks; Matt S Cavilla; David E Usevitch; Trevor L Bruns; Katherine E Riojas; Lisandro Leon; Robert J Webster; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 4.  Magnetic Soft Materials and Robots.

Authors:  Yoonho Kim; Xuanhe Zhao
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 72.087

5.  Estimating the Pose of a Guinea-pig Cochlea Without Medical Imaging.

Authors:  David E Usevitch; Albert H Park; Verena Scheper; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.619

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.