Literature DB >> 22115692

Cochlear implantation: current and future device options.

Matthew L Carlson1, Colin L W Driscoll, René H Gifford, Sean O McMenomey.   

Abstract

Today most cochlear implant users achieve above 80% on standard speech recognition in quiet testing, and enjoy excellent device reliability. Despite such success, conventional designs often fail to provide the frequency resolution required for complex listening tasks. Furthermore, performance variability remains a vexing problem, with a select group of patients performing poorly despite using the most recent technologies and processing strategies. This article provides a brief history of the development of cochlear implant technologies, reviews current implant systems from all 3 major manufacturers, examines recently devised strategies aimed at improving device performance, and discusses potential future developments.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22115692     DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-6665            Impact factor:   3.346


  20 in total

1.  Durability of Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation with Conventional-Length Electrodes and Scala Tympani Insertion.

Authors:  Alex D Sweeney; Jacob B Hunter; Matthew L Carlson; Alejandro Rivas; Marc L Bennett; Rene H Gifford; Jack H Noble; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Human audiometric thresholds do not predict specific cellular damage in the inner ear.

Authors:  Lukas D Landegger; Demetri Psaltis; Konstantina M Stankovic
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Frequency change detection and speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Gabrielle Underwood; Kelli McGuire; Chun Liang; David R Moore; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Optimizing the Magnetic Dipole-Field Source for Magnetically Guided Cochlear-Implant Electrode-Array Insertions.

Authors:  Lisandro Leon; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  J Med Robot Res       Date:  2018-01-22

Review 5.  On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.

Authors:  Joseph P Roche; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  Measures of Comparative Behavior in Hearing Loss Patients with Cochlear Implant: Caretaker Assessment.

Authors:  Jarinratn Sirirattawan; Kitsarawut Khuancharee
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-04

7.  Persistent Language Delay Versus Late Language Emergence in Children With Early Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Johanna Nicholas; Emily Tobey; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  An In-Vitro Insertion-Force Study of Magnetically Guided Lateral-Wall Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Lisandro Leon; Frank M Warren; Jake J Abbott
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Neural Substrate Expansion for the Restoration of Brain Function.

Authors:  H Isaac Chen; Dennis Jgamadze; Mijail D Serruya; D Kacy Cullen; John A Wolf; Douglas H Smith
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-25

10.  Biohybrid cochlear implants in human neurosensory restoration.

Authors:  Ariane Roemer; Ulrike Köhl; Omid Majdani; Stephan Klöß; Christine Falk; Sabine Haumann; Thomas Lenarz; Andrej Kral; Athanasia Warnecke
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.