| Literature DB >> 29996514 |
Thomas Blankers1, Kevin P Oh2, Kerry L Shaw3.
Abstract
Mating behavior divergence can make significant contributions to reproductive isolation and speciation in various biogeographic contexts. However, whether the genetic architecture underlying mating behavior divergence is related to the biogeographic history and the tempo and mode of speciation remains poorly understood. Here, we use quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping to infer the number, distribution, and effect size of mating song rhythm variations in the crickets Laupala eukolea and Laupala cerasina, which occur on different islands (Maui and Hawaii). We then compare these results with a similar study of an independently evolving species pair that diverged within the same island. Finally, we annotate the L. cerasina transcriptome and test whether the QTL fall in functionally enriched genomic regions. We document a polygenic architecture behind the song rhythm divergence in the inter-island species pair that is remarkably similar to that previously found for an intra-island species pair in the same genus. Importantly, the QTL regions were significantly enriched for potential homologs of the genes involved in pathways that may be modulating the cricket song rhythm. These clusters of loci could constrain the spatial genomic distribution of the genetic variation underlying the cricket song variation and harbor several candidate genes that merit further study.Entities:
Keywords: Laupala; quantitative genetics; sexual isolation; speciation; transcriptome
Year: 2018 PMID: 29996514 PMCID: PMC6070818 DOI: 10.3390/genes9070346
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Phenotypic distributions for the parental lines and first- and second-generation hybrid offspring. The data from the F1 hybrids in the top panel are from Oh et al., 2012 [43], and are shown to illustrate the F1 distributions as well as the maternal bias in the pulse rate inheritance. The F2 data are split by cross type (HC1 and HC2).
Phenotypic distributions. The mean and standard deviation of the pulse rate (pulses per second) and the sample size are shown for the parental species and the F2 generation (both cross types, HC1 and HC2).
| Mean (pps) | sd |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.33 | 0.07 | 24 |
|
| 3.99 | 0.12 | 16 |
| Environmental variance * | 0.02 | 0.13 | |
| F2 HC1 | 3.11 | 0.20 | 94 |
| F2 HC2 | 3.16 | 0.23 | 136 |
| F2 mean | 3.14 | 0.22 | 230 |
* Environmental variance was calculate following the work of Fishman et al. [97]; ‘mean’ in this context refers to the environmental variance, while ‘sd’ is the square root of that variance.
Figure 2Quantitative trait locus (QTL) scan. Results from composite interval mapping (black lines) and multiple QTL models (grey lines, only for linkage groups with significant QTL). The vertical solid and dotted lines show the experiment-wide 5% significance threshold for the composite interval mapping (CIM) for autosomes and the X-chromosome, respectively. Between HC1 and HC2, the horizontal dotted lines connect the homologous markers associated with the QTL peaks (within the CIM windows) to indicate the overlap between the QTL scans in the different mapping families (see Figure S1 for more detail). The panels on the far right show the effect size of each of the QTL as the pulse rate mean ± standard error for each of the genotype categories AA (left), AB (center), and BB (right).
Quantitative trait locus (QTL) results from HC1 and HC2. The QTL were mapped using the maps for the 94 HC1 and 136 HC2 F2 individuals. LOD—log-of-odds. The A and B alleles denote L. cerasina and L. eukolea alleles, respectively. All of the QTL effects (in pulses per second) are significantly different from zero. ESD—environmental standard deviation.
| Phenotypic Value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Group | Location (cM) | LOD | Nearest Scaffold | Marker Location | AA | AB | BB | Effect (pps) | % Parental Difference | #ESDs | % F2 Variance |
|
| |||||||||||
| 1 | 119 | 17.81 | S004794 | 119.4 | 2.88 | 3.14 | 3.31 | 0.220 | 13.23 | 1.75 | 50.60 |
| 3 | 72.0 | 7.04 | S001552 | 71.3 | 2.95 | 3.13 | 3.16 | 0.116 | 6.95 | 0.92 | 14.96 |
|
| |||||||||||
| 1 | 56.9 | 23.27 | S002490 | 56.9 | 2.90 | 3.18 | 3.31 | 0.217 | 13.04 | 1.72 | 38.67 |
| 3 | 65.0 | 13.92 | S000355 | 67.1 | 3.03 | 3.17 | 3.28 | 0.148 | 8.90 | 1.08 | 19.42 |
| 5 | 38.4 | 5.55 | S002808 | 38.4 | 3.04 | 3.17 | 3.25 | 0.074 | 4.45 | 0.60 | 6.67 |
| X | 32.0 | 3.42 | S000108 | 29.7 | 3.13 | - a | 3.19 | 0.049 | 2.95 | 0.39 | 3.96 |
a Cricket males are hemizygous.
QTL results from the combined map. The QTL were mapped using the consensus map for the 230 F2 individuals. LOD—log-of-odds. The A and B alleles denote the L. cerasina and L. eukolea alleles, respectively. All of the QTL effects are significantly different from zero. ESD—environmental standard deviation.
| Phenotypic Value | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linkage Group | Location (cM) | LOD | Nearest Scaffold | Marker Location | AA | AB | BB | Effect (pps) | % Parental Difference | #ESDs | % F2 Variance |
| 1 | 59.0 | 40.73 | S001131 | 58.8 | 2.89 | 3.17 | 3.31 | 0.203 | 12.22 | 1.61 | 36.39 |
| 2 | 71.0 | 4.78 | S001921 | 69.1 | 3.05 | 3.15 | 3.18 | 0.055 | 3.30 | 0.44 | 2.90 |
| 3 | 79.9 | 21.28 | S000385 | 79.9 | 3.02 | 3.14 | 3.23 | 0.123 | 7.40 | 0.98 | 15.34 |
| 4 | 59.8 | 3.97 | S016452 | 59.0 | 3.10 | 3.12 | 3.23 | 0.053 | 3.19 | 0.42 | 2.39 |
| 5 | 36.9 | 8.32 | S002445 | 36.9 | 3.05 | 3.16 | 3.19 | 0.068 | 4.08 | 0.54 | 5.23 |
| 7 | 5.0 | 3.51 | S007011 | 9.8 | 3.08 | 3.14 | 3.20 | 0.045 | 2.68 | 0.35 | 2.10 |
| X | 38.0 | 5.46 | S003132 | 37.2 | 3.10 | - | 3.17 | 0.041 | 2.46 | 0.32 | 3.34 |
| cross | - | 2.24 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.092 | 5.53 | 0.44 | 1.33 |
Figure 3Treemap of enriched genetic oncology (GO) categories. The GO terms were subset, removing all of the redundant GO terms in REVIGO [98] at the medium-similarity criterion (0.7). The GO terms are grouped based on the taxonomic relations among them. The colors connect the GO terms belonging to the same cluster. The size of the panels scales with the negative 10-logarithm of the p-value for the enrichment test.
Comparison of the QTL effects for intra-island versus inter-island divergence. The QTL effects (in pulses per second and as a percentage of the parental difference) are shown for the Shaw et al. (2007) [58] study (the intra-island comparison, results from Table 2b in that study) and for the results of the present study (the inter-island comparison).
| LG | Intra-Island (Shaw et al. 2007 [ | Inter-Island (This Study) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pps | % Parental Difference | pps | % Parental Difference | |
| 1 | 0.281 * | 9.3 * | 0.203 | 12.2 |
| 2 | 0.098 | 3.3 | 0.055 | 3.3 |
| 3 | 0.152 * | 5.1 * | 0.123 | 7.4 |
| 4 | 0.143 | 4.8 | 0.053 | 3.2 |
| 5 | 0.297 | 9.9 | 0.068 | 4.1 |
| 7 | … | … | 0.045 | 2.7 |
| X | 0.231 | 7.7 | 0.041 | 2.5 |
* On LG1 and LG3, two peaks were detected in the intra-island comparison. Here, only the major peak is shown.