Literature DB >> 20404144

Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes.

Fred Gould1, Marie Estock, N Kirk Hillier, Bekah Powell, Astrid T Groot, Catherine M Ward, Jennifer L Emerson, Coby Schal, Neil J Vickers.   

Abstract

Long distance sexual communication in moths has fascinated biologists because of the complex, precise female pheromone signals and the extreme sensitivity of males to specific pheromone molecules. Progress has been made in identifying some genes involved in female pheromone production and in male response. However, we have lacked information on the genetic changes involved in evolutionary diversification of these mate-finding mechanisms that is critical to understanding speciation in moths and other taxa. We used a combined quantitative trait locus (QTL) and candidate gene approach to determine the genetic architecture of sexual isolation in males of two congeneric moths, Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens. We report behavioral and neurophysiological evidence that differential male responses to three female-produced chemicals (Z9-14:Ald, Z9-16:Ald, Z11-16:OAc) that maintain sexual isolation of these species are all controlled by a single QTL containing at least four odorant receptor genes. It is not surprising that pheromone receptor differences could control H. subflexa and H. virescens responses to Z9-16:Ald and Z9-14:Ald, respectively. However, central rather than peripheral level control over the positive and negative responses of H. subflexa and H. virescens to Z11-16:OAc had been expected. Tight linkage of these receptor genes indicates that mutations altering male response to complex blends could be maintained in linkage disequilibrium and could affect the speciation process. Other candidate genes such as those coding for pheromone binding proteins did not map to this QTL, but there was some genetic evidence of a QTL for response to Z11-16:OH associated with a sensory neuron membrane protein gene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20404144      PMCID: PMC2889340          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910945107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  A divergent gene family encoding candidate olfactory receptors of the moth Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Jürgen Krieger; Klaus Raming; Youssef M E Dewer; Stefanie Bette; Sidonie Conzelmann; Heinz Breer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  The evolution of pheromone diversity.

Authors:  Matthew R E Symonds; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Introgressing pheromone QTL between species: towards an evolutionary understanding of differentiation in sexual communication.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Catherine Ward; Jing Wang; Amanda Pokrzywa; Jennifer O'Brien; Joy Bennett; Jennifer Kelly; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Identification of a gene associated with Bt resistance in Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  L J Gahan; F Gould; D G Heckel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Joseph B Roethele; Kenneth Filchak; Julie Niedbalski; Jeanne Romero-Severson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

7.  Nearest neural neighbors: moth sex pheromone receptors HR11 and HR13.

Authors:  Thomas C Baker
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  QTL analysis of sex pheromone blend differences between two closely related moths: Insights into divergence in biosynthetic pathways.

Authors:  Astrid T Groot; Marie L Estock; Joy L Horovitz; Jennifer Hamilton; Richard G Santangelo; Coby Schal; Fred Gould
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.714

9.  Candidate pheromone receptors provide the basis for the response of distinct antennal neurons to pheromonal compounds.

Authors:  Ewald Grosse-Wilde; Thomas Gohl; Elisabeth Bouché; Heinz Breer; Jürgen Krieger
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Defining a synthetic pheromone blend attractive to male Heliothis subflexa under wind tunnel conditions.

Authors:  Neil J Vickers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  39 in total

1.  On the scent of pleiotropy.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Smells like a new species: gene duplication at the periphery.

Authors:  David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex-linked transcription factor involved in a shift of sex-pheromone preference in the silkmoth Bombyx mori.

Authors:  Tsuguru Fujii; Takeshi Fujii; Shigehiro Namiki; Hiroaki Abe; Takeshi Sakurai; Akio Ohnuma; Ryohei Kanzaki; Susumu Katsuma; Yukio Ishikawa; Toru Shimada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Single mutation to a sex pheromone receptor provides adaptive specificity between closely related moth species.

Authors:  Greg P Leary; Jean E Allen; Peggy L Bunger; Jena B Luginbill; Charles E Linn; Irene E Macallister; Michael P Kavanaugh; Kevin W Wanner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Age and mating status do not affect transcript levels of odorant receptor genes in male antennae of Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa.

Authors:  Stephanie Soques; Gissella M Vásquez; Christina M Grozinger; Fred Gould
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Pheromone receptor evolution in the cryptic leafroller species, Ctenopseustis obliquana and C. herana.

Authors:  Bernd Steinwender; Amali H Thrimawithana; Ross N Crowhurst; Richard D Newcomb
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Hairpencil volatiles influence interspecific courtship and mating between two related moth species.

Authors:  Neil Kirk Hillier; Neil J Vickers
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  A rearrangement of the Z chromosome topology influences the sex-linked gene display in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis.

Authors:  Jeremy A Kroemer; Brad S Coates; Tyasning Nusawardani; S Dean Rider; Lisa M Fraser; Richard L Hellmich
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Specificity of the receptor for the major sex pheromone component in Heliothis virescens.

Authors:  Gissella M Vásquez; Zainulabeuddin Syed; Patricia A Estes; Walter S Leal; Fred Gould
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.857

10.  Genetic mapping of male pheromone response in the European corn borer identifies candidate genes regulating neurogenesis.

Authors:  Fotini A Koutroumpa; Astrid T Groot; Teun Dekker; David G Heckel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.