Literature DB >> 29972306

Ribonucleotide discrimination by translesion synthesis DNA polymerases.

Alexandra Vaisman1, Roger Woodgate1.   

Abstract

The well-being of all living organisms relies on the accurate duplication of their genomes. This is usually achieved by highly elaborate replicase complexes which ensure that this task is accomplished timely and efficiently. However, cells often must resort to the help of various additional "specialized" DNA polymerases that gain access to genomic DNA when replication fork progression is hindered. One such specialized polymerase family consists of the so-called "translesion synthesis" (TLS) polymerases; enzymes that have evolved to replicate damaged DNA. To fulfill their main cellular mission, TLS polymerases often must sacrifice precision when selecting nucleotide substrates. Low base-substitution fidelity is a well-documented inherent property of these enzymes. However, incorrect nucleotide substrates are not only those which do not comply with Watson-Crick base complementarity, but also those whose sugar moiety is incorrect. Does relaxed base-selectivity automatically mean that the TLS polymerases are unable to efficiently discriminate between ribonucleoside triphosphates and deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates that differ by only a single atom? Which strategies do TLS polymerases employ to select suitable nucleotide substrates? In this review, we will collate and summarize data accumulated over the past decade from biochemical and structural studies, which aim to answer these questions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA polymerase; mutant polymerases; replicative bypass; ribonucleotide incorporation; steric gate; translesion DNA synthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29972306      PMCID: PMC6261451          DOI: 10.1080/10409238.2018.1483889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 1040-9238            Impact factor:   8.250


  133 in total

1.  Differential correction of lagging-strand replication errors made by DNA polymerases {alpha} and {delta}.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Grace E Kissling; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular insights into DNA polymerase deterrents for ribonucleotide insertion.

Authors:  Nisha A Cavanaugh; William A Beard; Vinod K Batra; Lalith Perera; Lee G Pedersen; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V.

Authors:  M Tang; X Shen; E G Frank; M O'Donnell; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structural mechanism of ribonucleotide discrimination by a Y-family DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Kevin N Kirouac; Zucai Suo; Hong Ling
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Escherichia coli UmuC active site mutants: effects on translesion DNA synthesis, mutagenesis and cell survival.

Authors:  Wojciech Kuban; Alexandra Vaisman; John P McDonald; Kiyonobu Karata; Wei Yang; Myron F Goodman; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-07-10

Review 6.  Structural diversity of the Y-family DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Janice D Pata
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2010-02-01

7.  8-oxo-guanine bypass by human DNA polymerases in the presence of auxiliary proteins.

Authors:  Giovanni Maga; Giuseppe Villani; Emmanuele Crespan; Ursula Wimmer; Elena Ferrari; Barbara Bertocci; Ulrich Hübscher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Impact of ribonucleotide incorporation by DNA polymerases β and λ on oxidative base excision repair.

Authors:  Emmanuele Crespan; Antonia Furrer; Marcel Rösinger; Federica Bertoletti; Elisa Mentegari; Giulia Chiapparini; Ralph Imhof; Nathalie Ziegler; Shana J Sturla; Ulrich Hübscher; Barbara van Loon; Giovanni Maga
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  PrimPol-A new polymerase on the block.

Authors:  Sean G Rudd; Julie Bianchi; Aidan J Doherty
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29

10.  RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA.

Authors:  Federico Lazzaro; Daniele Novarina; Flavio Amara; Danielle L Watt; Jana E Stone; Vincenzo Costanzo; Peter M Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  17 in total

1.  RNase HIII Is Important for Okazaki Fragment Processing in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Taylor M Nye; Katherine J Wozniak; Justin R Randall; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Mitochondrial DNA Damage: Prevalence, Biological Consequence, and Emerging Pathways.

Authors:  Linlin Zhao; Philip Sumberaz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Rotational and translational positions determine the structural and dynamic impact of a single ribonucleotide incorporated in the nucleosome.

Authors:  Iwen Fu; Duncan J Smith; Suse Broyde
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-11-29

Review 4.  Ribonucleotide incorporation into DNA during DNA replication and its consequences.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiong Zhou; Jessica S Williams; Scott A Lujan; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 5.  The Impact of RNA-DNA Hybrids on Genome Integrity in Bacteria.

Authors:  Emma K McLean; Taylor M Nye; Frances C Lowder; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 16.232

Review 6.  Ribonucleotide Incorporation by Eukaryotic B-Family Replicases and Its Implications for Genome Stability.

Authors:  Jessica S Williams; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 27.258

7.  A polar filter in DNA polymerases prevents ribonucleotide incorporation.

Authors:  Mary K Johnson; Jithesh Kottur; Deepak T Nair
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Role of RNase H enzymes in maintaining genome stability in Escherichia coli expressing a steric-gate mutant of pol VICE391.

Authors:  Erin Walsh; Sarah S Henrikus; Alexandra Vaisman; Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska; Thomas J Armstrong; Krystian Łazowski; John P McDonald; Myron F Goodman; Antoine M van Oijen; Piotr Jonczyk; Iwona J Fijalkowska; Andrew Robinson; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-08-10

9.  Impact of 1,N 6-ethenoadenosine, a damaged ribonucleotide in DNA, on translesion synthesis and repair.

Authors:  Pratibha P Ghodke; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Current perspectives on mechanisms of ribonucleotide incorporation and processing in mammalian DNA.

Authors:  Akira Sassa; Manabu Yasui; Masamitsu Honma
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2019-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.